Made available in DSpace on 2015-04-14T14:48:14Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
446422.pdf: 104787 bytes, checksum: c9193359ddfba2f7405987fd260a08e5 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2013-02-22 / This research has been focused on the individualization of punishment, understanding it as a symbolic exercise of violence coming from the legal field, staring from approaching penal theories produced by the Penal Dogmatic, which are, in fact, theories that aim to provide legitimacy to the state monopoly when punishing. The individualization of punishment, tributary from retributive and prevention theories, has taken place in the Brazilian criminal ordering as a fundamental right with constitutional entry. Although its basis has been saving the principle of penal proportionality, it has also constituted one more dispositive for the movement of penal rationalization, fixed on a complex quantification system, apparently turned to humanization. The solution found by the Brazilian legal and criminal ordering for the individualization of punishment, strongly deliberating the circumstances that not only meet the author s individual characteristics, but also tends to direct sentences in the pathway of Criminal Law by him, has maintained present, this way, the etiological pattern of legal and criminal positivism. Thereby, the analysis of a sample of first degree condemnation sentences on theft or simple stealing and drug traffic crimes practiced in Porto Alegre, selected from criminal appeals addressed to TJRS in 2009 and 2010, aim to demonstrate the hypothesis that, beyond reproducing law terms literally without justifying them, has indicated that criminal dosimetry was permeated by notions of common sense, what currently has signified a strong punitive tendency. It is not possible, however, to affirm that individualization criteria have been applied in most of the sentences.
Therefore, they have specially predominated on stealing and traffic cases, onerous punishments, and being executed in closed regime, regardless of dealing with criminality mostly unarmed, non-organized, disperse and with agents and victims from popular extraction, characterizing, thus, the selectivity of the criminal system. Such symbolic exercise of violence has been understood once it means imposing submission and exclusion, as if it were the scientific application of canonic texts - as revealing the strong presence of anti-guaranteed tendencies in the magistracy of the first degree. / A presente pesquisa foca-se na individualiza??o da pena, compreendendo-a como exerc?cio da viol?ncia simb?lica a partir do campo jur?dico. Parte-se da abordagem das teorias da pena que a Dogm?tica Penal produziu, que s?o de fato teorias que visam a dar legitimidade ao monop?lio estatal de punir. A individualiza??o da pena, tribut?ria das teorias retributivas e preventivas, tem lugar no ordenamento jur?dico brasileiro como um direito fundamental com assento constitucional. Embora tenha por fundamento resguardar o princ?pio da proporcionalidade das penas, constitui-se em mais um dispositivo do movimento de racionaliza??o da pena, assentado em um complexo sistema de quantifica??o, aparentemente voltado ? humaniza??o. A solu??o encontrada pelo ordenamento jur?dico-penal brasileiro para a individualiza??o da pena, com a forte pondera??o das circunst?ncias que dizem com as caracter?sticas individuais do autor, tende a direcionar as senten?as na senda do Direito Penal do autor. Mant?m assim presente a matriz etiol?gica do positivismo jur?dico-penal. A an?lise de uma amostra de senten?as condenat?rias de primeiro grau em crimes de furto e roubo simples e tr?fico de drogas praticados em Porto Alegre, selecionadas a partir de apela??es-crime dirigidas ao TJRS nos anos de 2009 e 2010, visa demonstrar a hip?tese de que, al?m de reproduzir de forma literal os termos da lei sem fundament?-los, a dosimetria da pena ? permeada de no??es de senso comum, o que na atualidade significa forte tend?ncia punitivista. N?o se pode, afirmar que na maioria das senten?as se aplicou crit?rios de individualiza??o.
De modo que, prevalecem especialmente em casos de roubo e tr?fico, penas gravosas e cumpridas em regime fechado, a despeito de se tratar de uma criminalidade majoritariamente desarmada, n?o organizada, dispersa e com agentes e v?timas de extra??o popular, caracterizando assim a seletividade do sistema penal. Entende-se que tal exerc?cio da viol?ncia simb?lica - pois se trata de impor a submiss?o e exclus?o, como se de aplica??o cient?fica de textos can?nicos se tratasse - revela a forte presen?a de tend?ncias antigarantistas na magistratura de primeiro grau.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/4909 |
| Date | 22 February 2013 |
| Creators | Schneider, Ingrid |
| Contributors | Saavedra, Giovani Agostini |
| Publisher | Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Ci?ncias Criminais, PUCRS, BR, Faculdade de Direito |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, instacron:PUC_RS |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | 3263773896050529173, 500, 600, 2194221341323903125 |
Page generated in 0.0022 seconds