Return to search

Down-sizing and right-sizing: An analysis of the demobilisation process in the South African National Defence Force

Faculty of Humanities
School of Social Sciences
9003886p
mashikel@social.wits.ac.za / Using in-depth interviews with key informants, participant observation, an analysis of
documentary and archival sources, and a survey of a national sample of 395 former
APLA and MK soldiers, this study analyses the process of demobilisation in South
Africa between 1994 and 2004. The key questions are: why and how was the
demobilisation process conducted and what were its consequences? Demobilisation is
a shorthand term for the multi-staged process of converting a soldier to a civilian. This
encompasses the release of soldiers from a statutory force or guerrilla group and their
reintegration into civilian society. Reintegration is defined as “the process of
facilitating the ex-soldiers’ transition to civilian life” (Clark, 1995: 50). In South
Africa, demobilisation was envisaged as the last phase in the process of forming the
South African National Defence Force (SANDF). The Interim Constitution (Act No.
200 of 1993) made provision for three phases in the formation of the SANDF. First
was the integration of various armed forces. This was followed by a process of
consolidation, which included the completion of bridging training by former members
of the Azanian People’s Liberation Army (APLA) and uMKhonto we Sizwe (MK).
The final phase was the reduction of the size of the integrated SANDF, known as
rationalisation. However, the concept held the same meaning as demobilisation.
The thesis of this study is that the reduction of the size of the SANDF (known as
rationalisation) was necessary for two reasons. First was the perceived and real
improvement in the national and regional security environment. Second was the
perceived economic and development impact of the reduction of defence expenditure.
These were informed by the broadened concept of security, which was popularised by
non-governmental organisations such as the Military Research Group. However,
while rationalisation was postponed and anticipated as the final phase in the process
of forming the SANDF, the presence of military “misfits” among former APLA and
MK soldiers (the aged, the sick and those who lacked the necessary educational
qualifications) led to the introduction of a process of excluding these categories from
the process of integration. The process became known as demobilisation and was
introduced without adequate planning. It differed from the anticipated rationalisation
process which was meant to apply to all members of the integrated SANDF.
Various factors pointed to the lack of adequate planning. First, demobilisation was
introduced before the finalisation of the relevant legislation, and consequently the
process was halted in 1995. Second, the demobilisation of former APLA and MK
soldiers was not accompanied by effective reintegration programmes. The
reintegration programme that was assembled consisted of a once-off demobilisation
gratuity, a voluntary two-week counselling programme and an option to join the
Service Corps for an eighteen-month vocational training programme. Third, while the
Service Corps was part of the reintegration programme, it was not operational when
demobilisation began. When it became operational, it was ineffective as an institution
to provide for the re-skilling of demobilised former APLA and MK soldiers.
The lack of adequate planning for the demobilisation and reintegration of former
APLA and MK soldiers has hindered their full social and economic reintegration into
civilian society. Following an analysis of the socio-economic needs of a national
sample of 395 former APLA and MK soldiers, it is argued that they have not achieved
economic reintegration in the sense of achieving a productive livelihood.
Furthermore, it is argued that while respondents have achieved social reintegration
some of them continue to see themselves as a distinct group different from other
members of the society. Thus, demobilised soldiers may threaten the consolidation of
democracy in South Africa and destabilise the region. The proliferation of light
weapons throughout the region following the end of armed conflict and the lack of
effective disarmament in South Africa increases the potential not only for violent
crime but also for serious political and social disruptions.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:netd.ac.za/oai:union.ndltd.org:wits/oai:wiredspace.wits.ac.za:10539/1645
Date13 November 2006
CreatorsMashike, John Lephophotho
Source SetsSouth African National ETD Portal
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeThesis
Format310371 bytes, 104125 bytes, 216721 bytes, 343443 bytes, 630250 bytes, 600288 bytes, 56679 bytes, 24932 bytes, 13168 bytes, 716782 bytes, 477554 bytes, 29091 bytes, 514764 bytes, 371890 bytes, 24725 bytes, 53942 bytes, 149050 bytes, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf, application/pdf

Page generated in 0.0017 seconds