Submitted by Verena Bastos (verena@uefs.br) on 2015-08-04T00:42:15Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
Disserta??o Am?lia Ivine Costa Santana.pdf: 2199413 bytes, checksum: c8afd67767cc43a2e0a711b88cf742f4 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2015-08-04T00:42:15Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
Disserta??o Am?lia Ivine Costa Santana.pdf: 2199413 bytes, checksum: c8afd67767cc43a2e0a711b88cf742f4 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2015-03-02 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior - CAPES / The importance of work in people's lives has been consistently reported in the literature. However, the work may also contribute to changes in physical and mental health of the individuals. Mental disorders related to work, has reached a significant portion of the Brazilian population, in this context, it is highlight common mental disorders (CMD), which under the health work are configured as a highly relevant problem because imply commitment of care provided to the user. In the field of occupational health, psychosocial aspects of work have been the subject of numerous studies, showing that there is at work risk factors invisible capable of causing suffering and illness. Among the tools to evaluate the psychosocial aspects of work is the demand-control model (MDC) and the model of effort-reward imbalance (effort-reward imbalance model - ERI), both widely used in the literature and whose proposals are to show different work stressors and their relationship to outcomes on health. This study has the following objectives: evaluate the contribution of analysis models combined psychosocial work stress and its association with TMC and highlight the interaction between psychosocial aspects of work and the occurrence of TMC. This was a cross-sectional study conducted with a representative sample of primary care workers in five counties of the state of Bahia. The outcome variable was the TMC measured by SRQ-20 and exposure models were demand-control-support social and effort-reward imbalance. We evaluated the performance of partial and complete models and combination of partial models, the interaction was verified by the departure from additivity of effects for the factors studied by calculating the excess risk due to interaction, proportion of cases attributed to the interaction and synergy index. The adjusted prevalence ratios with 95% confidence limits were obtained by Poisson regression with robust variance method. The overall prevalence of CMDs was 21.0% and was associated with high strain and effort-reward imbalance high and showed greater magnitude in the combined exposure group. The results showed better performance than full effort-reward imbalance model and the combination of partial models to predict the event, showed still exist interaction between psychosocial aspects of work and TMC, directed to the synergy of effects. / A influ?ncia do trabalho na vida das pessoas tem sido consistentemente apontada na literatura. No entanto, o trabalho tamb?m pode contribuir para altera??es da sa?de f?sica e mental dos indiv?duos. Os transtornos mentais relacionados ao trabalho t?m atingido uma parcela significativa da popula??o trabalhadora brasileira, nesse contexto, cabe evidenciar os transtornos mentais comuns (TMC), que no ?mbito do trabalho em sa?de se configuram como um problema de grande relev?ncia, pois implicam em comprometimento do cuidado prestado ao usu?rio. No campo da sa?de ocupacional, os aspectos psicossociais do trabalho t?m sido objeto de estudos que demonstram haver no trabalho fatores de risco invis?veis capazes de gerar sofrimento e adoecimento. Dentre os instrumentos capazes de avaliar os aspectos psicossociais do trabalho est? o modelo demanda-controle (MDC) e o modelo de desequil?brio esfor?o-recompensa (effort-reward imbalance model - ERI), ambos largamente utilizados na literatura e cujas propostas consistem em evidenciar diferentes estressores laborais e sua rela??o com desfechos sobre a sa?de. OBJETIVOS: avaliar a contribui??o da an?lise de modelos combinados de estresse psicossocial no trabalho e sua associa??o com TMC e evidenciar a intera??o entre os aspectos psicossociais do trabalho e a ocorr?ncia de TMC. M?TODOS: Tratou-se de estudo transversal conduzido com amostra representativa de trabalhadores da aten??o b?sica de cinco munic?pios do estado da Bahia. A vari?vel desfecho foram os TMC mensurados pelo SRQ-20 e as de exposi??o foram os modelos demanda-controle-apoio social e desequil?brio esfor?o-recompensa. Foram avaliados os desempenhos dos modelos parciais e completos e a combina??o dos modelos parciais, a intera??o foi verificada atrav?s do afastamento da aditividade dos efeitos para os fatores estudados a partir do c?lculo do excesso de risco devido ? intera??o, propor??o de casos atribu?da ? intera??o e ?ndice de sinergia. As raz?es de preval?ncia ajustadas com 95% de confian?a foram obtidas pelo m?todo de regress?o de Poisson com vari?ncia robusta. RESULTADOS: A preval?ncia global de TMC foi de 21,0% e esteve associada ? alta exig?ncia e ao alto desequil?brio esfor?o-recompensa e apresentou maior magnitude no grupo de exposi??o combinada. CONCLUS?O: Os resultados demonstraram melhor desempenho do modelo de desequil?brio esfor?o-recompensa completo e da combina??o dos modelos parciais para predizer o evento. Evidenciaram ainda, existir intera??o entre os aspectos psicossociais do trabalho e TMC, com dire??o para a sinergia dos efeitos.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.uefs.br:8080:tede/155 |
| Date | 02 March 2015 |
| Creators | Santana, Am?lia Ivine Costa |
| Contributors | Almeida, Maura Maria Guimar?es de |
| Publisher | Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Mestrado Acad?mico em Sa?de Coletiva, UEFS, Brasil, DEPARTAMENTO DE SA?DE |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UEFS, instname:Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, instacron:UEFS |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | -121975901865722803, 600, 600, 600, 600, 8549511740116106200, -6173167103754495199, 2075167498588264571 |
Page generated in 0.003 seconds