Submitted by Setor de Tratamento da Informa??o - BC/PUCRS (tede2@pucrs.br) on 2016-03-17T11:12:16Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
TES_JOAO_HENRIQUE_CASARA_BORGES_COMPLETO.pdf: 1515462 bytes, checksum: 5a856dacdda82fc1ee619ed76bae7a4d (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-03-17T11:12:16Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
TES_JOAO_HENRIQUE_CASARA_BORGES_COMPLETO.pdf: 1515462 bytes, checksum: 5a856dacdda82fc1ee619ed76bae7a4d (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2015-12-22 / The following paper intends to analyze the paradox, through the Theory of the Semantic Blocks, considering, mostly, the relations that occurs inside the four-sided figure that demonstrate how the meanings get along. In order to do that, will be studied the conceptions arising from the referred theory, as well as its conventional roots and theories from another theorists. Along the revision of the pertinent literature will be studies ideas from Ferdinand de Saussure, especially the ones about relation and linguistic values, because they are significant important to understand the linguistic meaning of any terms in the language. Another idea that will be developed at the following paper is the empty sign, studied by Benveniste, which will be explained and will be the object for new considerations, in order to study the presence of an emptiness inside every word. Also during the study of the literature, the ideas of meaning understood only by the linguistic relations among words will be object of thoughts. In order to do that, the ideas of Oswald Ducrot and Marion Carel will be very important, especially the linguistic orientation, linguistic relations, because they will demonstrate how the meaning is constructed. Other notions of those two theoretical authors are the idea of semantic block and argumentative four-sided figure. The paradox, according to the semantics, will be studied considering the ideas of Carel, Ducrot and Borges (2011), aiming its application in the argumentative figure. Specifically, the observation of the paradox in the figure can demonstrate how the normative and transgressive relations occurs. There were select a song and an advertisement to demonstrate those kind of relations, by using a methodology that focus in the particular cases. At the end, the results will be shown and the final considerations will be constructed, based on the premise of analyzing the paradox in the argumentative four-sized figure. / A presente tese estuda o paradoxo, do ponto de vista da Teoria dos Blocos Sem?nticos, observando, fundamentalmente, as rela??es que ocorrem no quadrado argumentativo. Para isso, estudam-se os conceitos da teoria mencionada, bem como seus fundamentos precursores e as ra?zes advindas de outros te?ricos. Ao longo da fundamenta??o te?rica s?o estudados os conceitos de Ferdinand de Saussure, principalmente a no??o de rela??o e valor lingu?stico, pois fundamentais para a constru??o do sentido. Ademais, o conceito de signo vazio de Benveniste ? explicitado e serve de base para novas reflex?es, que observam a ocorr?ncia de uma parte vazia nas palavras. Ainda, dentro dos pressupostos te?ricos, s?o estudadas as no??es iniciais de argumenta??o na l?ngua, atrav?s dos escritos de Oswald Ducrot, visando a obten??o do entendimento necess?rio para uma compreens?o adequada da Teoria dos Blocos Sem?nticos, atualmente desenvolvida por Marion Carel. Dentre os conceitos mais importantes para o estudo em pauta, est?o a orienta??o lingu?stica, as rela??es lingu?sticas, que demonstrar?o como o sentido ? constru?do, bem como a no??o de bloco sem?ntico e quadrado argumentativo. O paradoxo sem?ntico ? abordado com a utiliza??o dos estudos de Carel e Ducrot, e de Borges (2011), mirando sua aplica??o dentro do quadrado argumentativo, ou seja, observa-se o comportamento das rela??es de normatividade e transgressividade entre os encadeamentos do quadrado, derivado de um bloco sem?ntico. O objeto das an?lises consiste em uma can??o nacional e uma propaganda, ambas contendo sentidos paradoxais. A metodologia utilizada ? a an?lise de cada objeto de forma ?nica, com etapas pr?prias. Concluiu-se que o paradoxo constitui aspectos normativos paradoxais, mas n?o aspectos transpostos e conversos.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/6537 |
| Date | 22 December 2015 |
| Creators | Borges, Jo?o Henrique Casara |
| Contributors | Barbisan, Leci Borges |
| Publisher | Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Letras, PUCRS, Brasil, Faculdade de Letras |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, instacron:PUC_RS |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | 8447345070736321569, 600, 600, 600, -2856882280194242995, -5409419262886498088 |
Page generated in 0.0022 seconds