Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2016-04-08T22:42:10Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
LeninCavalcantiBritoGuerra_TESE.pdf: 1844309 bytes, checksum: 807fa40f72dda5fadfd91c4fdb7e6bb4 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2016-04-11T22:14:07Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
LeninCavalcantiBritoGuerra_TESE.pdf: 1844309 bytes, checksum: 807fa40f72dda5fadfd91c4fdb7e6bb4 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-11T22:14:07Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
LeninCavalcantiBritoGuerra_TESE.pdf: 1844309 bytes, checksum: 807fa40f72dda5fadfd91c4fdb7e6bb4 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2015-06-05 / A presente tese teve como objetivo geral analisar de que forma a atua??o das coaliz?es afetou
o processo de formula??o do Programa Universidade para Todos (Prouni). Trata-se de um
Programa em que estudantes oriundos do ensino m?dio p?blico ou que foram bolsistas
integrais em escolas particulares recebem bolsas de estudo em Institui??es de Ensino Superior
(IES) privadas, que recebem incentivos fiscais em tributos federais. Como referencial de
an?lise, utilizou-se o Advocacy Coalition Framework (ACF), quadro de refer?ncia
desenvolvido por Sabatier e Jenkins-Smith (1993) que concebe o processo de formula??o das
pol?ticas p?blicas como sendo fruto da competi??o entre grupos de atores, chamados de
coaliz?es, que est?o envolvidos ou interessados em uma determinada quest?o de pol?tica
p?blica. Os atores se aglutinam em coaliz?es a partir de cren?as, valores, posturas t?cnicas e
posi??es sobre quest?es operacionais da pol?tica p?blica e agem coordenadamente para
defender seus interesses, interferindo no processo de formula??o daquelas pol?ticas. Em
rela??o aos aspectos metodol?gicos, trata-se de uma pesquisa qualitativa que utilizou:
estrutura narrativa para apresentar o desenvolvimento da educa??o superior brasileira e o
Prouni, a partir da an?lise de documentos oficiais, notas taquigr?ficas de audi?ncias p?blicas
no Congresso e entrevistas com servidores que atuaram no Minist?rio da Educa??o (MEC) ?
?poca da formula??o do programa (consultores legislativos da C?mara e do Senado, al?m do
ex-deputado relator do Projeto de Lei 3.582/2004, que deu origem ao Prouni). Como
resultados, foram identificadas duas coaliz?es: a estatista, que se posicionou contr?ria ao
programa; e a privatista, que defendia sua formula??o. Os embates, que ocorreram, sobretudo,
no Congresso Nacional, evidenciaram as estrat?gias para operacionalizar as cren?as. As duas
coaliz?es utilizaram fortemente as informa??es t?cnicas e a mobiliza??o por meio da
milit?ncia (mobilizate troops). Entretanto, a coaliz?o privatista atuou mais fortemente nesse
caso e foi capaz de transformar suas cren?as em estrat?gias de a??o mais eficazes. A
configura??o final do Prouni foi ben?fica para as IES privadas e evidenciou uma mudan?a nas
pol?ticas p?blicas ligadas ? educa??o superior, uma vez que o apoio governamental, por meio
de isen??es fiscais, antes concedidos somente a IES sem fins lucrativos, passou a ser
extensivo tamb?m ?s IES com finalidade lucrativas. / This thesis aims to analyze how the performance of the coalitions affected the formulation
process of the Programa Universidade para Todos ? Prouni. This is a program in which
students from public high school, or who have been integral stock in private colleges and
universities receive scholarships in private institutions, which receive tax incentives in federal
taxes. As analytical framework, was used the advocacy coalition framework (ACF)
framework developed by Sabatier and Jenkins-Smith (1993) that conceives the process of
formulation of policies as a result of competition between groups of actors called coalitions,
which are involved or interested in an issue of public policy. The actors coalesce into
coalitions from beliefs, values, technical postures and positions on operational matters of
public policy and act coordinately to defend their interests, interfering in the formulation of
policies. With regard to methodological aspects, it is a qualitative study that used a narrative
structure to present the development of Brazilian higher education and Prouni, analyzing
official documents, shorthand notes of public congressional hearings and interviews with
servers who worked in Ministry of Education (Brazil) time of program formulation,
legislative counsel of the brazilian congress, plus the former deputy rapporteur of the Bill
3.582 / 2004, which led to Prouni. Two coalitions were identified: statist, which stood
contrary to the program, and privatized, which defended its formulation. The clashes, which
occurred mainly in Congress, highlight the strategies to operationalize beliefs. The two
coalitions heavily used technical information and mobilization, through militancy (mobilizate
troops). However, privatizing coalition acted more strongly in this case and was able to turn
their beliefs into more effective action strategies. The final configuration of the Prouni was
beneficial for private institutions, and showed a change in public policies related to higher
education, since government support through tax breaks, before granted only to non-profit
IES, became extensive also the IES with lucrative purpose.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/20223 |
| Date | 05 June 2015 |
| Creators | Guerra, Lenin Cavalcanti Brito |
| Contributors | 50918125553, http://lattes.cnpq.br/6801465547614647, Sano, Hironobu, 21299461867, http://lattes.cnpq.br/6037766951080411, Anez, Miguel Eduardo Moreno, 36936561420, Coelho, Fernando de Souza, 25909119800, http://lattes.cnpq.br/2038805993153668, Ara?jo, Suely Mara Vaz Guimar?es de, 28109708153, http://lattes.cnpq.br/8757845751582248, Fernandes, Antonio S?rgio Ara?jo |
| Publisher | Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, PROGRAMA DE P?S-GRADUA??O EM ADMINISTRA??O, UFRN, Brasil |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
| Source | reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN, instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, instacron:UFRN |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0161 seconds