During the Revolutionary War, many key Patriot leaders believed that militia were untrustworthy and useless in battle. After the American victory, many of the same men proclaimed their support for the militia as the foundation of the new nation's defense. The debate on the efficacy of Patriot militia continues into modern scholarship; some historians credit the militia with an important strategic role in the war, while others consider them a mere footnote in a conflict that was truly won by the Continental Army. This series of case studies examines four American expeditionary militia units to assess their level of military competence and professionalism. The results show that militia units were far from amateur, and many conducted their operations in a professional military manner. This supports a conclusion that militia both contributed to the American victory and remained a practical means of defense for the young nation.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:unt.edu/info:ark/67531/metadc2332619 |
| Date | 05 1900 |
| Creators | Avery, Arthur Jared |
| Contributors | Chet, Guy, Leggiere, Michael V., 1969-, Wawro, Geoffrey |
| Publisher | University of North Texas |
| Source Sets | University of North Texas |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Thesis or Dissertation |
| Format | Text |
| Rights | Public, Avery, Arthur Jared, Copyright, Copyright is held by the author, unless otherwise noted. All rights Reserved. |
Page generated in 0.0017 seconds