Submitted by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br) on 2017-05-18T17:34:10Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
DIS_ANTONIO_GOYA_DE_ALMEIDA_MARTINS-COSTA_PARCIAL.pdf: 608697 bytes, checksum: 8c4b8e7aedd70bed44e62abaf5a3966f (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-05-18T17:34:10Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
DIS_ANTONIO_GOYA_DE_ALMEIDA_MARTINS-COSTA_PARCIAL.pdf: 608697 bytes, checksum: 8c4b8e7aedd70bed44e62abaf5a3966f (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2016-12-19 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior - CAPES / This dissertation aim to study a set of problems that derived from the equiparation of the
omission to the action in improper omissive crimes (Gleichstellungsproblematik) in
contemporary criminal law, all that from the theory of the position of guarantee (Theorie der
Garantenstellung). In other words, this research intends to investigate the merits and demerits
of some of the most important theories found in contemporary literature commonly used to
explain the aforementioned phenomenon. The methodology select by us to solve the questions
raised was the bibliographical review of several studies presented in order to elucidate the
problem at hand. The dissertation is divided into five chapters. The first one seeks to
demonstrates how this problem was posed by the criminal dogmatics and, consequently, aim to
discusses the reasons why a set of notorious proposals defend that the two forms of conduct
(omission of the impediment of a result and its production by an action) must receive the same
treatment under criminal law. The next three chapters analyze three different theories built
around the problem we seek to investigate (material-formal theories, Jakobs theory and
Sch?nemann's theory). In each chapter, after characterizing the aforementioned theories, we
intend to list the objections commonly made by de doctrine to them and, afterwards, present a
set of critical observations. The fifth chapter summarizes the main points discussed in the course
of this investigation, concluding that the Sch?nemann's approach is the theoretical perspective
that - if nuanced with a formal-material theory - offers us a more plausible and coherent solution
for the problems posed by the theory of the position of guarantee. This positioning surely
reduces the scope of guarantee of supervision and control of sources of danger only to
obligations of insurance in legal traffic (Verkehrssicherungspflichten), denying rescue duties
(Rettungspflichten) in the position of guarantee by interference. One of the main conclusions of
the research is that the starting point for the solution of the ?problem of equalization? must be
an argument based on the idea of similarity. That similarity must be found in the analytical
structure that justifies the imputation of the result to both the commission and the omission
conducts. / A disserta??o tem como objeto de estudo a problem?tica da equipara??o da omiss?o ?
a??o nos crimes omissivos impr?prios (Gleichstellungsproblematik) no direito penal
contempor?neo a partir da teoria da posi??o de garantia (Theorie der Garantenstellung). O
objetivo ? investigar o fundamento da posi??o de garantia analisando os m?ritos e dem?ritos de
algumas das teorias encontradas na literatura contempor?nea para explicar esse fen?meno. A
metodologia empregada foi a revis?o bibliogr?fica, com exposi??o e an?lise de diversas
propostas de solu??o da problem?tica da equipara??o. A disserta??o est? dividida em cinco
cap?tulos. O primeiro deles demonstra a forma como o referido problema se colocou para a
dogm?tica penal e discorre sobre as diversas propostas que a doutrina apresentou para tentar
justificar que duas formas diversas de conduta (omiss?o do impedimento de um resultado e a
sua produ??o por uma a??o) recebessem o mesmo tratamento pelo direito penal. Os tr?s
cap?tulos seguintes analisam tr?s propostas completamente diferentes de fundamenta??o te?rica
da posi??o de garantia que est?o presentes no direito penal contempor?neo (teorias materiaisformais,
teoria de Jakobs e teoria de Sch?nemann). Em cada um desses cap?tulos, ap?s a
exposi??o da teoria, apresentam-se as obje??es feitas a ela que foram encontradas na literatura,
tomando-se posi??o. O quinto cap?tulo faz uma recapitula??o e s?ntese dos principais pontos
tratados ao longo da investiga??o, chegando-se ? conclus?o de que a teoria de Sch?nemann,
matizada com uma teoria material-formal ? aquela que oferece uma solu??o mais plaus?vel e
coerente para a teoria da posi??o de garantia. Esse posicionamento acarreta a redu??o do ?mbito
da garantia de supervis?o e controle de fontes de perigo apenas a deveres de asseguramento no
tr?fego jur?dico (Verkehrssicherungspflichten), negando os deveres de salvamento
(Rettungspflichten) na posi??o de garantia por inger?ncia. Uma das principais conclus?es ? que
o ponto de partida para a resolu??o da problem?tica da equipara??o deve ser um argumento de
similitude, o qual h? de ser encontrado na estrutura que justifica a imputa??o do resultado tanto
? comiss?o quanto ? omiss?o.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/7282 |
| Date | 19 December 2016 |
| Creators | Martins-Costa, Ant?nio Goya de Almeida |
| Contributors | D'Avila, Fabio Roberto |
| Publisher | Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Ci?ncias Criminais, PUCRS, Brasil, Escola de Direito |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, instacron:PUC_RS |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | 3263773896050529173, 600, 600, 600, 600, 4512033976268881925, -7277407233034425144, 2075167498588264571 |
Page generated in 0.0139 seconds