Submitted by PPG Ci?ncias Criminais (ppgccrim@pucrs.br) on 2018-05-08T14:30:33Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
TESE - MARCELO ALMEIDA SANT ANNA - 2018.pdf: 2297983 bytes, checksum: e1d2f3ea90e44a6ed1626cb0bfdde1aa (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br) on 2018-05-14T13:17:08Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
TESE - MARCELO ALMEIDA SANT ANNA - 2018.pdf: 2297983 bytes, checksum: e1d2f3ea90e44a6ed1626cb0bfdde1aa (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-05-14T13:21:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
TESE - MARCELO ALMEIDA SANT ANNA - 2018.pdf: 2297983 bytes, checksum: e1d2f3ea90e44a6ed1626cb0bfdde1aa (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2018-03-23 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior - CAPES / Doctorate thesis in Criminal Sciences, developed in Concentration Area Criminal System and Violence and linked in Field of Research Contemporary Legal-Criminal Systems. The analysis of the criminal field allows us to evidence the existence of a constitutional deficit, especially in the preliminary phase of the criminal process. Investigation, as a space of power and as a procedure for the production of truths, is not properly connected to the procedural stage, which ends up by broadening excessively discretion, producing unilateral knowledge. Adversary proceeding and right to a fair hearing are constitutional principles applicable to both stages of criminal prosecution, albeit at different intensity. Therefore, there is a need for a procedural interim period prior to the criminal complaint, made in the form of a preliminary hearing. In the end, the a result of reaserch allowed device a bill. / Tese de doutorado em Ci?ncias Criminais realizada na ?rea de Concentra??o Sistema Penal e Viol?ncia e vinculada ? Linha de Pesquisa Sistemas Jur?dico-Penais Contempor?neos. A an?lise do campo penal permite afirmar a exist?ncia de um d?ficit constitucional, especialmente na fase preliminar do processo penal. A investiga??o, enquanto espa?o de poder e enquanto procedimento de produ??o de verdades, n?o est? devidamente conectada ? fase processual o que acaba por ampliar demasiadamente a discricionariedade, produzindo um saber unilateral. O contradit?rio e a ampla defesa, por sua vez, s?o preceitos constitucionais aplic?veis a ambas as etapas da persecu??o penal, ainda que em intensidade diferente. Dessa forma, verifica-se a necessidade de um momento de interregno procedimental anterior ? den?ncia criminal, realizado na forma de audi?ncia preliminar. Ao final, como resultado da pesquisa realizada, elabora-se um projeto de lei.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/8031 |
| Date | 23 March 2018 |
| Creators | Sant'Anna, Marcelo Almeida |
| Contributors | Pozzebon, Fabricio Dreyer Avila de |
| Publisher | Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Ci?ncias Criminais, PUCRS, Brasil, Escola de Direito |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, instacron:PUC_RS |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | 3263773896050529173, 500, 500, 500, 600, 4512033976268881925, -7277407233034425144, 2075167498588264571 |
Page generated in 0.1082 seconds