Submitted by Caroline Xavier (caroline.xavier@pucrs.br) on 2017-07-04T18:10:09Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
TES_SAUL_ESTEVAM_FERNANDES_COMPLETO.pdf: 3375408 bytes, checksum: 27f32bc3a1409a358307936c83c75258 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-07-04T18:10:09Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
TES_SAUL_ESTEVAM_FERNANDES_COMPLETO.pdf: 3375408 bytes, checksum: 27f32bc3a1409a358307936c83c75258 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2017-03-23 / Conselho Nacional de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico - CNPq / The present study discusses how the mechanisms for resolving interstate boundary issues were metamorphosed during the First Republic through debates in various institutions, such as the National Congress, the Senate, the Federal Supreme Court (STF), among others. We have noticed that, in the beginning, thought from the subordinations of the state interests to a greater interest, the national, the resolution devices of the interstates boundaries issues have been dissolved throughout the politics. However, the gaps found in the elaboration of the constitution of 1891 were of fundamental importance for the judicialization of those devices. We also have noticed that the process of judicialization started at the STF ended up metamorphosed in other ways, because of the long legal proceedings of brazilian justice, giving subterfuges on recognizing and strenghtening of the arbitral tribunals, as well as in the importance attributed to the national executive through the intermediary of the President of the Republic or emissaries linked to it. / O presente estudo discute como os dispositivos de resolu??o das quest?es de limites interestaduais foram se metamorfoseando durante a Primeira Rep?blica atrav?s dos debates em diversas institui??es, como Congresso Nacional, Senado Federal, Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF), dentre outras. Perceberemos que, inicialmente, a partir da subordina??o dos interesses estaduais pelo interesse maior, o nacional, as resolu??es das quest?es de limites foram pensadas para serem dirimidas atrav?s da pol?tica. Contudo, as brechas dispostas na produ??o da Constitui??o de 1891 foram de fundamental import?ncia para que houvesse a judicializa??o dos dispositivos. Ainda perceberemos que o processo de judicializa??o iniciado no STF acabou se metamorfoseando em outro meio, pois os demorados tr?mites da justi?a brasileira acabaram dando subterf?gios no reconhecimento e fortalecimento dos Tribunais Arbitrais, assim como na import?ncia atribu?da ao Executivo Nacional por meio da intermedia??o do Presidente da Rep?blica ou de emiss?rios vinculados ao mesmo.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/7567 |
| Date | 23 March 2017 |
| Creators | Fernandes, Saul Estevam |
| Contributors | Maia, Tatyana de Amaral |
| Publisher | Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Hist?ria, PUCRS, Brasil, Escola de Humanidades |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, instacron:PUC_RS |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | 1740700517806534787, 600, 600, 600, 600, -6557531471218110192, -3840921936332040591, -2555911436985713659 |
Page generated in 0.0017 seconds