Submitted by Leticia Alvarenga (leticiaalvarenga@fdv.br) on 2018-08-31T17:41:16Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
ANNA PAULA MASIERO RIGO NASS.pdf: 883951 bytes, checksum: 1b556e4f61387d57b1d9933e4667fe20 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Ana Paula Galdino (repositorio@fdv.br) on 2018-09-03T20:26:34Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
ANNA PAULA MASIERO RIGO NASS.pdf: 883951 bytes, checksum: 1b556e4f61387d57b1d9933e4667fe20 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-09-03T20:26:43Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
ANNA PAULA MASIERO RIGO NASS.pdf: 883951 bytes, checksum: 1b556e4f61387d57b1d9933e4667fe20 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2014-03-13 / Propõe-se uma análise da nova concepção proposta nos votos do
Ministro Relator Gilmar Mendes e do Ministro Eros Grau, os quais visam a equiparar os efeitos do controle difuso aos do controle concentrado de constitucionalidade, dispensando a participação do Senado Federal, a quem, nos termos do artigo 52, X1, da Constituição Federal, compete dar publicidade à suspensão da execução de lei declarada inconstitucional, incidentalmente,
por decisão definitiva do Supremo Tribunal Federal. Por outro lado, oportuno citar que os votos dos Ministros Sepúlveda Pertence (aposentado), Joaquim Barbosa e Ricardo Lewandowski se contrapõem ao argumento da equiparação dos efeitos, tendo os mesmos se posicionado pela manutenção literal do disposto no artigo 52, X, da Constituição Federal. Questiona-se, portanto, se seria possível atribuir efeitos erga omnes e vinculantes às decisões proferidas em controle difuso, emanadas do Supremo Tribunal Federal, por meio da mutação constitucional proposta na Reclamação n. 4335/AC, no contexto do Estado Democrático de Direito. / An analysis is proposed of the new concept proposed in the Minister Gilmar Mendes and Minister Eros Grau, which aim to equate the effects of diffuse control with the concentrated control of constitutionality, without the participation of the Federal Senate, who, under the terms of Article 52, X1, of the Federal Constitution, is responsible give publicity to the suspension of the execution of law declared unconstitutional, incidentally, by final decision of the Federal Supreme Court. On the other hand, it is worth mentioning that the votes of the Ministers Sepúlveda Pertence (retired), Joaquim Barbosa and Ricardo Lewandowski are opposed to the argument of the equalization of effects, having been positioned by the literal maintenance of the provisions of Article 52, X, of the Federal Constitution . It is therefore questioned whether it would be possible to attribute erga omnes and binding effects to the decisions handed down in diffuse control, emanating from the Federal Supreme Court, through the constitutional change proposed in Complaint no. 4335 / AC, in the context of the Democratic State of Law.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:191.252.194.60:fdv/231 |
| Date | 13 March 2014 |
| Creators | Nass, Anna Paula Masiero Rigo |
| Contributors | Brasil Júnior, Samuel Meira, Esteves, Carolina Bonadiman, Mendonça, Christine |
| Publisher | Faculdade de Direito de Vitoria, FDV, Brasil |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | Portuguese |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Source | reponame:Repositório da Faculdade de Direito de Vitória, instname:Faculdade de Direito de Vitória, instacron:FDV |
| Rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/, info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0037 seconds