Šiame darbe nagrinėjama Vidurio Europos visuomenių kultūrinė transformacija perėjimo į demokratiją procese. Remiantis skirtingais liberalų ir sociologų požiūriais į kultūros transformaciją, darbe siekiama empiriškai įvertinti kultūrinės, politinės ir ekonominės transformacijos sąveiką, išryškinant kultūrinę transformaciją įtakojančius veiksnius. Kultūros raidos specifika analizuojama pagal keturių skirčių schemą: nacionalizmas vs. kosmopolitizmas, sekuliarumas vs. religingumas, komunizmas vs. antikomunizmas ir liberalizmas vs. autoritarizmas. Darbe daroma išvada, kad politinių / ekonominių reformų radikalumas tik ribotai lemia kultūros transformaciją demokratijai palankia linkme. Tyrimas atskleidžia, kad kai kurie pamatiniai kultūriniai elementai praktiškai nereaguoja į politines ir ekonomines reformas, todėl, bent jau kultūrinės transformacijos prasme, demokratijos konsolidacijos perspektyvos Vidurio Europos šalyse artimiausiu metu yra ribotos. / The collapse of communist rule in Central Europe (CE) and the third wave of democratization gave a significant impulse for development of theory of political sciences. Though the democratization process in CE is analyzed from various perspectives, key attention is paid for procedural aspects of regime transformation: institutional reforms, the creation of market economy, consolidation of democracy, CE integration to the European Union are the most attractive topics for researches of political sciences. Still there is a lack of theoretical approach towards systemic transformation that includes not only political or economical, but also cultural factors. Therefore it is worth to complement this gap of theoretical literature by focusing on aspects of the cultural transformation in the postcommunist region. The main purpose of the master dissertation is to analyze the dynamics of cultural transformation in four CE countries: Poland, Hungary, Czech Republic and Slovakia. The results of research of cultural cleavages in CE countries shows that the cultural transformation in each country does not depend particulary on radical political and economical reforms. Culture developes according its own logic, and non of the theories is adequate to explain cultural transformation. Research shows that some cultural elements (trust, tolerance) are not in the phase of transformation at all: they are stagnant, not reactive to reforms. Therefore, the communist legacies have still strong roots in... [to full text]
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:LABT_ETD/oai:elaba.lt:LT-eLABa-0001:E.02~2008~D_20140623_181449-32096 |
| Date | 23 June 2014 |
| Creators | Gaidytė, Teodora |
| Contributors | Sirutavičius, Vladas, Vilnius University |
| Publisher | Lithuanian Academic Libraries Network (LABT), Vilnius University |
| Source Sets | Lithuanian ETD submission system |
| Language | Lithuanian |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Master thesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | http://vddb.library.lt/obj/LT-eLABa-0001:E.02~2008~D_20140623_181449-32096 |
| Rights | Unrestricted |
Page generated in 0.0029 seconds