Made available in DSpace on 2015-04-14T13:30:31Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
454706.pdf: 713974 bytes, checksum: b4c4d030b32ac428abd2ac68d41fed1c (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2014-01-13 / The introduction of ceramics in dentistry occurred since the eighteenth century through the use in complete denture. Bilayered systems composed by metal and ceramic emerged from the 60s and the interest in ceramic systems composed by a ceramic infrastructure that provides resistance associated with an aesthetic cover ceramic becomes evident in the last decades of the past century. Thus, different types of ceramics were inserted in the dental commerce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the microtensile bond strength of three systems of all-ceramics: E- max Press, In-Ceram Zirconia and Mark II with its respectively veneering porcelain. Samples were prepared by using a conformer of ceramic samples and included in the center of a ring of polyvinyl chloride (PVC). Three samples of each system were cut into microbars of a square millimeter in cross section. Five specimens of each sample were randomly selected for the microtensile bon strength test (n = 14). An Universal Testing Machine with 0,5mm/min was used for the microtensile bond strength test. Data were statistically analyzed using the G * Power 3.1.7 software. The distribution of normality was analyzed using the Shapiro-Wilk test (E- max Press, p = 0,96; In-Ceram Zirconia, p = 0,25, Mark II, p = 0,56). There were no homogeneity between samples when was used Levene test (p = 0,01). For this reason, the data were submitted to analysis of variance test followed by multiple comparison Games-Howell test. There was statistically significant difference between groups (p = 0,01), and E-max Press (17,88a ? 5,92 MPa) showed higher resistance to the other groups, followed by Mark II (12,98b ? 4,21 MPa) and In-Ceram Zirconia (9.44c ? 2.25 MPa). Therefore, there is a significant difference between the union of infrastructure and coverage in the different systems, which may influence longevity of these restorations. / A introdu??o das cer?micas na odontologia ocorreu a partir do s?culo XVIII atrav?s da utiliza??o das mesmas em pr?tese total. Sistemas bilaminares compostos por metal e cer?mica surgiram a partir da d?cada de 60 e o interesse por sistemas cer?micos bilaminares compostos por uma cer?mica de infra-estrutura que proporciona resist?ncia associada a uma cer?mica de cobertura que oferece est?tica torna-se evidente nas ?ltimas d?cadas do s?culo passado. Assim, diversos tipos de cer?micas foram introduzidas no mercado odontol?gico. O objetivo deste estudo foi avaliar a resist?ncia ? microtra??o de tr?s sistemas de cer?micas puras: E-max Press, In-Ceram Zirc?nia e Mark II com as respectivas cer?micas de cobertura de cada sistema. As amostras foram confeccionadas atrav?s da utiliza??o de um conformador de amostras de cer?micas e inclu?das no centro de um anel de policloreto de vinila (PVC). Tr?s amostras de cada sistema foram cortadas em palitos de um mil?metro quadrado em sua sec??o transversal. Cinco corpos-de-prova de cada amostra foram selecionados aleatoriamente para o teste de microtra??o (n = 14). Para o ensaio de microtra??o foi utilizada uma M?quina de Ensaio Universal com velocidade de 0,5mm/min. Os dados obtidos foram analisados estatisticamente atrav?s do software G* Power 3.1.7. A distribui??o de normalidade foi verificada com o teste Shapiro-Wilk (E-max Press, p = 0,96; In-Ceram Zirc?nia, p = 0,25; Mark II, p = 0,56). N?o foi verificada homogeneidade entre as amostras atrav?s do teste de Levene (p = 0,01). Portanto, os dados foram submetidos ao teste de An?lise de Vari?ncia seguido de teste de Compara??es M?ltiplas Games-Howell. Foi registrada diferen?a estatisticamente significativa entre os grupos (p = 0,01), sendo que E-max Press (17,88a ? 5,92 MPa) apresentou resist?ncia a microtra??o superior aos demais grupos, seguido de Mark II (12,98b ? 4,21 MPa) e In-Ceram Zirc?nia (9,44c ? 2,25 MPa). Portanto, verifica-se uma diferen?a significativa entre a uni?o das cer?micas de infra-estrutura e cobertura nos diferentes sistemas, o que poder? influenciar na longevidade cl?nica destas restaura??es.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/1238 |
| Date | 13 January 2014 |
| Creators | Fracasso, Lisiane Martins |
| Contributors | Mota, Eduardo Gon?alves |
| Publisher | Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Odontologia, PUCRS, BR, Faculdade de Odontologia |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, instacron:PUC_RS |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | -8096554818733665164, 500, 600, 4673435736271820140 |
Page generated in 0.0024 seconds