Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T15:12:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
CatarinaR_DISSERT.pdf: 573602 bytes, checksum: 83caeaada44bac16fdb1463348983765 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2010-06-28 / This work posits a mutual implication between metaphysics and morality in the philosophy of Schopenhauer and seeks to clarify the many nuances that take place in this relation. Each chapter offers a perspective in which the relation between metaphysics and morality can be addressed. Thus, by exposing some important aspects of representation theory of Schopenhauer, we try, in the first chapter, explain the relationship between his idealism and his conception of morality; in the second chapter, the determinism present both in nature and in moral actions, determinism that establishes the relationship between morality and metaphysics through the very notion of a metaphysical nature; in the third chapter, relationship between metaphysics and morality that takes place through the notion of freedom as denial of the previous determinism, freedom possible to the genius, to the saint and to the ascetic. All of these perspectives, however, presuppose the distinction between phenomenon and thing-initself, figuring this distinction as crucial in building of this metaphysic that seeks to
protect the moral significance of the world while denying the existence of God / Este trabalho afirma uma m?tua implica??o entre metaf?sica e moralidade na filosofia de Schopenhauer e busca explicitar as diversas nuan?as na qual se d? essa rela??o. Cada cap?tulo apresenta uma perspectiva na qual a rela??o entre metaf?sica e moralidade pode ser abordada. Desse modo, atrav?s da exposi??o de alguns aspectos importantes da teoria da representa??o de Schopenhauer, tentamos, no primeiro cap?tulo, explicitar a rela??o entre seu idealismo e sua concep??o de moralidade; no segundo cap?tulo, o determinismo presente tanto na natureza quanto nas a??es morais estabelece a rela??o entre moralidade e metaf?sica atrav?s da pr?pria no??o de metaf?sica da natureza; no terceiro cap?tulo, a rela??o entre metaf?sica e moralidade se d? atrav?s da no??o de liberdade como nega??o do determinismo anterior, liberdade essa poss?vel ao g?nio, ao santo e ao asceta. Todas essas perspectivas, entretanto, pressup?em a distin??o entre fen?meno e coisa-em-si, figurando tal distin??o como indispens?vel na constru??o dessa metaf?sica que busca resguardar a significa??o moral do mundo ao mesmo tempo em
que nega a exist?ncia de Deus
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/16477 |
| Date | 28 June 2010 |
| Creators | Rochamonte, Catarina |
| Contributors | CPF:60948973900, http://lattes.cnpq.br/0947794412767249, Bulh?es, Fernanda Machado, CPF:03380749702, http://lattes.cnpq.br/1213107957524166, Santos, Deyve Redyson Melo dos, CPF:77154282304, http://lattes.cnpq.br/1784229392558094, Conte, Jaimir |
| Publisher | Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Filosofia, UFRN, BR, Metaf?sica |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN, instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, instacron:UFRN |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0052 seconds