This study will explore the dichotomy of culture and psychological landscape in Edith Wharton The Age of Innocence. To lay the foundation for this study, I first consider how Ms. Wharton often employed dichotomy in her own life: her role as socialite and author, woman of old New York and European maverick, and her life as spouse or beloved. Compartmentalizing her lifes roles prevented her from having to compromise the distinct qualities of each paradigm. Similarly, in The Age of Innocence, Ellen and May are completely opposite representations of life and culture in the 1870s who cannot happily coexist together. Wharton draws this contrast by painting their psychological landscapes, relying heavily on the motifs of water and fire, elements that if combined are mutually destructive. Ellen is unpredictable, uncensored, and exotic even Promethean; Wharton uses images of fire to convey this mindset.
Conversely, Mays character is often cold, controlled and pale; she is a sculpted product, not a creator. In rare moments, May is radiant, even warm, but she never approaches Ellens heat. Wharton emphasizes then that there is no true bridge between Ellens and Mays ways of living through Newland Archer who fails to cross from his world to Ellens even though his love for her is true and enduring. My writing will argue that Newland fails to consummate his love for Ellen because Wharton has drawn a character who lacks the ability to choose. Although he admires the fire he sees in Ellen, it is something he must do from afar, for he is a man ultimately made of water.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:USF/oai:scholarcommons.usf.edu:etd-3849 |
| Date | 01 June 2005 |
| Creators | DeBorde, Alisa Mariva |
| Publisher | Scholar Commons |
| Source Sets | University of South Flordia |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | text |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | Graduate Theses and Dissertations |
| Rights | default |
Page generated in 0.0024 seconds