Submitted by Leticia Schettini (leticia@ufrrj.br) on 2016-09-19T13:26:00Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
2009 - Leonardo Mitrano Neves.pdf: 932793 bytes, checksum: 1e42ee61916afbed6020d0c2430fa7a4 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-09-19T13:26:00Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
2009 - Leonardo Mitrano Neves.pdf: 932793 bytes, checksum: 1e42ee61916afbed6020d0c2430fa7a4 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2009-03-05 / Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico - CNPQ / The estuarine systems influence fish assemblages, throughout their longitudinal gradients and
remarkable salinity changes. Such assemblages adapt to different habitat constraints and
change in spatial and temporal scales. The aim of this study was to assess the ichthyofauna
composition and structure in three zones of the Mambucaba estuary (CZ ? coastal zone; MZ ?
mixture zone and RZ ? river zone) and their relationship with environmental variables and
habitat characteristics. Systematic fish collections (2 months in each seasons) were performed
between October 2007 and August 2008, by using otter trawl at two sites in CZ (C1 e C2),
beach seine at three sites in MZ (M1, M2, M3) and mesh trays at two sites in RZ (R1 e R2).
At each fish sampling occasion, both surface and depth environmental variables of
temperature, salinity, conductivity, turbidity and dissolved oxygen were taken and depth was
measured. A total of 14,320 individuals, in 111 species (RZ ? 18; MZ ? 50, and CZ - 66) were
collected. Distinct fish assemblages were found for each zone, as indicated by low number of
common species (14 - MZ and CZ; 8 - MZ and RZ; and 2 - CZ and RZ), and only one
abundant species (> 1% of the total number of fish within the zone) being common in more
than one zone (Eucinostomus argenteus in CZ and MZ). Such pattern can be related to high
salinity variation in MZ and narrow (20 m) channel width connecting the estuary with the sea,
which can limit fish movement (into/out of the estuary). In CZ, the three more abundant
species were Paralonchurus brasiliensis, Ctenosciaena gracillicirrhus, Anchoa lyolepis,
Larimus breviceps and Stellifer brasiliensis, with large contribution of fish from the
Scieanidae family in this zone (18 species). Spatial changes inf fish species were not
consistent in CZ, probably due to lack of spatio-temporal estuarine plume influence on depth
environmental variables (ANOVA, p>0.05). Depth was the main factor to influence spatial
changes for Diapterus rhombeus (negative association) more abundant in C1 (average depth =
10 m; ANOVA, p<0.05) and Micropogonias furnieri, P. brasiliensis and Pellona harroweri
(positive association) more abundant in C2 (average depth = 17 m; ANOVA, p<0.00).
Diapterus rhombeus and Etropus crossotus occured mainly in Spring and Summer, and
Eucinosomus gula in Spring. The most abundant species in CZ, typical of high salinty
influence, is a indication that this zone have characteristics to inner continental shelf. In MZ,
most abundant species (Eugerres brasilianus, Eucinostomus melanopterus, Trinectes
paulistanus, Gobionellus shufeldti, G. oceanicus, Geophagus brasiliensis, Centropomus
parallelus and Citharichthys arenaceus) have higher number and weight of individuals in M1
(ANOVA, p<0.01), an adjacent lagoon connected to the main channel. In spite of the
significant negative correlation between this species and salinity (r-Spearman>0.32, p<0.01),
the more sheltered areas in M1 seem to be more important to determine this pattern than
salinity itself. The site M1 also have more number of individuals and species (ANOVA,
p<0.01), and larger number of fish of smaller size (CT median = 58mm) compared to M2 and
M3, located in the main channel (median = 106mm) according to Median and Kruskall-Wallis
tests (p<0.01; 2 = 1167.5), indicating the importance of this area for species recruitment.
Low average similarity (SIMPER) for sites M2 (38.7%) and M3 (17.8%) indicate larger
variability of assemblage in these sites, probably due to lesser habitat structure e higher
dynamism. In RZ, the fish assemblage have few species (5) with abundance higher than 1% of
the total number of fishes, being dominated by Dormitator maculatus, Astyanax sp and
ix
Microphis brachyurus lineatus, species typical of upper estuaries and lower river reaches.
Spatial variation was detected for D. maculatus only, more abundant at R2, a site with
abundant riparian vegetation, mainly grass. Dormitator maculatus was more abundant in
Summer and Autumn, M. brachyurus lineatus, in Spring, Autumn and Winter and Astyanax
sp was absent in Spring only. Patterns in fish assemblage structure were at large scale,
primarily species-specific responses to dominant environmental gradient, while at small scale,
results of association with the habitat. / Os sistemas estuarinos influenciam as assembl?ias de peixes, ao longo de seus gradientes
longitudinais e das marcadas varia??es da salinidade. Estas assembl?ias se adaptam ?s
diferentes condicionantes do habitat e variam em escalas espaciais e temporais. O objetivo do
presente estudo foi avaliar a composi??o e estrutura da ictiofauna em tr?s zonas do estu?rio do
rio Mambucaba (ZC ? zona costeira; ZM ? zona de mistura e ZR ? zona de rio) e suas
rela??es com as vari?veis ambientais e caracter?sticas do habitat destas zonas. Coletas
sistem?ticas de peixes (2 meses por esta??o do ano) foram realizadas entre outubro de 2007 e
agosto de 2008, com arrastos de fundo em dois locais da ZC (C1 e C2), arrasto de praia em 3
locais da ZM (M1, M2, M3) e peneira em 2 locais da ZR (R1 e R2). Em cada amostragem de
peixes, foram tomadas, para a superf?cie e fundo, as vari?veis ambientais de temperatura,
salinidade, condutividade, turbidez e oxig?nio dissolvido, bem como medida a profundidade.
Um total de 14320 indiv?duos, constitu?dos por 111 esp?cies (ZR ? 18; ZM ? 50 e ZC - 66)
foram coletados. Assembl?ias de peixes distintas foram identificadas para cada zona,
indicadas pelo baixo n?mero de esp?cies comuns (14 - ZM e ZC; 8 - ZM e ZR; e 2 - ZC e
ZR), e com apenas uma esp?cie abundante (> 1% do numero total de peixes na zona) comum
em mais de uma zona (Eucinostomus argenteus na ZC e ZM). Tal padr?o pode estar
relacionado ? maior variabilidade da salinidade existente na ZM e a estreita (20 m) largura do
canal de conex?o com o mar, fatores que podem ser limitantes aos movimentos
(entrada/sa?da) de peixes. Na ZC, as tr?s esp?cies mais abundantes foram Paralonchurus
brasiliensis, Ctenosciaena gracillicirrhus, Anchoa lyolepis, Larimus breviceps e Stellifer
brasiliensis, com a maior participa??o de peixes da fam?lia Sciaenidae nesta zona (18
esp?cies). As varia??es espaciais das esp?cies foram pouco consistentes na ZC,
provavelmente relacionado a influencia da pluma estuarina n?o ter provocado mudan?as
espa?o-temporais nas vari?veis ambientais de fundo (ANOVA, p>0,05). A profundidade foi o
principal fator respons?vel pela separa??o espacial encontrada para Diapterus rhombeus
(associa??es negativas) mais abundante em C1 (profundidade m?dia = 10 m; ANOVA,
p<0,05) e Micropogonias furnieri, P. brasiliensis e Pellona harroweri (associa??es positivas)
mais abundantes em C2 (profundidade m?dia = 17 m; ANOVA, p<0,00). Diapterus rhombeus
e Etropus crossotus ocorreram principalmente na primavera e ver?o, e Eucinosomus gula na
primavera. As esp?cies mais abundantes da ZC, t?picas de ?guas com maior influencia salina,
? um indicativo de que esta zona tem caracter?sticas mais associadas ? plataforma continental
interna. Na ZM, a maioria das esp?cies mais abundantes (Eugerres brasilianus, Eucinostomus
melanopterus, Trinectes paulistanus, Gobionellus shufeldti, G. oceanicus, Geophagus
brasiliensis, Centropomus parallelus e Citharichthys arenaceus) apresentou maior n?mero e
peso de indiv?duos em M1 (ANOVA, p<0,01), uma lagoa adjacente conectada ao canal
principal. Apesar das correla??es negativas significativas observadas entre estas esp?cies e a
salinidade (r-Spearman>0.32, p<0,01), as ?reas mais abrigadas em M1 parecem ser mais
determinantes neste padr?o do que a salinidade em si. O local M1 tamb?m apresentou o maior
n?mero de indiv?duos e de esp?cies (ANOVA, p<0,01), com maior n?mero de peixes de
menor tamanho (CT mediana = 58mm) do que dos locais M2 e M3, situados no canal
principal (mediana = 106mm) de acordo com o Teste das Medianas e Teste de Kruskallvii
Wallis (p<0,01;
2 = 1167,5), indicando a import?ncia desta ?rea para o recrutamento das
esp?cies. A baixa similaridade m?dia (SIMPER) para os locais M2 (38,7%) e M3 (17,8%)
indicam uma maior variabilidade na assembl?ia destes locais, possivelmente devido a menor
estrutura??o do habitat e maior dinamismo. Na ZR, a assembl?ia de peixes apresentou poucas
esp?cies (5) com abund?ncia maior que 1% do n?mero total de peixes, sendo dominada por
Dormitator maculatus, Astyanax sp e Microphis brachyurus lineatus, esp?cies t?picas de ?reas
lim?trofes entre a zona superior do estu?rio e a zona baixa de rio. Varia??es espaciais foram
detectadas apenas para D. maculatus, mais abundantes em R2, um local com abundante
vegeta??o marginal composta principalmente por gram?neas. D. maculatus foi mais abundante
no ver?o e outono, M. brachyurus lineatus, na primavera, outono e inverno e Astyanax sp foi
ausente somente na primavera. Os padr?es na estrutura da assembl?ia de peixes s?o, em maior
escala, primariamente resultado das respostas individuais das esp?cies ao gradiente ambiental
dominante, enquanto em menor escala, resultado das associa??es com o habitat.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:localhost:jspui/1207 |
| Date | 05 March 2009 |
| Creators | Neves, Leonardo Mitrano |
| Contributors | Ara?jo, Francisco Gerson, Monteiro Neto, Cassiano, Barletta, M?rio, Costa, Marcus Rodrigues da |
| Publisher | Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Biologia Animal, UFRRJ, Brasil, Instituto de Ci?ncias Biol?gicas |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ, instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, instacron:UFRRJ |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | 7- REFER?NCIAS BIBLIOGR?FICAS ARA?JO, F. G.; AZEVEDO, M. C. C.; M.; SILVA, M. A.; PESSANHA, A. L. M.; GOMES, I. D. & CRUZ-FILHO, A. G. 2002. Environmental Influences on the Demersal Fish Assemblages in the Sepetiba Bay, Brazil. Estuaries, 25, 441?450. ARA?JO, F. G.; CRUZ-FILHO, A. G.; AZEVEDO, M. C. C. & SANTOS, A. C. A. 1998. Structure of demersal fish community in the Sepetiba Bay, RJ. Revista Brasileira de Biologia, 58: 417-430. ARA?JO, F.G. 1992. Temporal and spatial changes in the fish community structure in the upper and middle Thames Estuary. Tese de doutorado. King?s College, 331 p. ARA?JO, F.G.; GUIMAR?ES, F.J.C. & COSTA, M.R. 2006. Environmental influences on distribution of four Sciaenidae species (Actynopterygii, Perciformes) in a tropical bay at Southeastern Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 23: 497-508. AZEVEDO, M. C. C.; ARA?JO, F. G.; CRUZ-FILHO, A. G.; PESSANHA, A. L. M.; SILVA, M. A. & GUEDES, A. P. P. 2007. Demersal fishes in a tropical bay in southeastern Brazil: Partitioning the spatial, temporal and environmental components of ecological variation. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 75: 468-480. BARLETTA, M.; AMARAL, C. S.; CORREA, M. F. M.; GUEBERT, F.; DANTAS, D.V.; LORENZI, L. & SAINT-PAUL, U. 2008. Factors affecting seasonal variations in demersal fish assemblages at an ecocline in a tropical?subtropical estuary. Journal of Fish Biology 73: 1314-1336. BARLETTA, M.; BARLETTA-BERGAN, A.; SAINT-PAUL, U. & HUBOLD, G. 2005. The role of salinity in structuring the fish assemblages in a tropical estuary. Journal of Fish Biology, 66: 45?72. BARLETTA-BERGAN, A.; BARLETTA, M. & SAINT-PAUL, U. 2002. Structure and seasonal dynamics of larval and juvenile fish in the mangrove-fringed estuary of the Rio Caet? in North Brazil. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 56: 193?206. BLABER, S. J. M. & BLABER, T. G. 1980. Factors affecting the distribution of juvenile estuarine and inshore fish. Journal of Fish Biology, 17: 143?162. BLABER, S. J. M. 2000. Tropical Estuarine Fishes: Ecology, Exploitation and Conservation. Oxford, Blackwell Science, 372 p. BLABER, S. J. M. 2002. ?Fish in hot water ?: the challenges facing fish and fisheries research in tropical estuaries. Journal of Fish Biology, 61 (Supplement A): 1?20. BLABER, S. J. M.; BREWER, D. T. & SALINI, J. P. 1995. Fish Communities and the Nursery Role of the Shallow Inshore Waters of a Tropical Bay in the Gulf of Carpentaria, Australia. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 40: 177-193. 101 BUIJSE, A. D.; COOPS, H; STARAS, M.; JANS, L. H; VAN GEEST, G. J; GRIFT, R. E.; IBELINGS, B. W.; OOSTERBERG, W. & ROOZEN, F. C. J. M. 2002. Restoration strategies for river floodplains along large lowland rivers in Europe. Freshwater Biology, 47: 889?907. CASTILLO-RIVERA, M.; MONTIEL, M.; A?ORVE, L. S. & Z?RATE, R. 2005. Spatial, seasonal and diel distribution patterns of two species of mojarras (Pisces: Gerreidae) in a Mexican tropical coastal lagoon. Journal of Applied Ichthyology, 21: 498?503. CHAPMAN, M. G. & UNDERWOOD, A. J. 1999. Ecological patterns in multivariate assemblages: information and interpretation of negative values in ANOSIM tests. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 80: 257-265. CLARKE, K. R. & WARWICK, R. W. 1994. Change in marine communities: an approach to statistical analysis and interpretation. Plymouth Marine Laboratory. 859 p. CONLAN, K.; HENDRY, K.; WHITE, K. N. & HAWKINS, S. J. 1998. Discused docks as habitats for estuarine fish: a case study of Preston dock. Journal of Fish Biology, 33 (Supplement A): 85-91. COSTA, M. R. & ARAUJO, F. G. 2003. Use of a tropical bay in southeastern Brazil by juvenile and subadult Micropogonias furnieri (Perciformes, Sciaenidae). Journal of Marine Science, 60: 268-277. COSTA, M. R.; ALBIERI, R. J.; ARAUJO, F. G. 2005. Size distribution of the jack Chloroscombrus chrysurus (Linnaeus) (Actinopterygii, Carangidae) in a tropical bay at Southeastern Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 22: 580-586. CYRUS D. P. 1988. Turbidity and other physical factors in Natal estuarine systems. Journal of the Limnological Society of Southern Africa, 14: 60?71. DAY JR., J. W.; HALL, C. A. S.; KEMP, W. M. & YA?ES-ARANCIBIA, A. 1989. Estuarine Ecology, Nova York, Jonh Wiley & Sons, 558p. DUFR?NE, M. & LEGENDRE, P. 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecological Monographs. 67:345-366. FARGO, J. & TYLER, A. V. 1991. Sustainability of flatfish-dominated fish assemblages in Hecate Strait, British Columbia, Canada. Netherlands Journal of Sea Research, 27: 237? 253. FERREIRA DA SILVA, L. C.; RESENDE, L. F.; RIBEIRO, B. C. & CAVALCANTI, A. S. B. 1996. Litoral Sul Fluminense: s?ntese do conhecimento das condi??es climatol?gicas e da din?mica costeira. Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Relat?rio T?cnico para Furnas Centrais El?tricas, 21 p. FIGUEIREDO, J. L. & MENEZES, N. A. 1978. Manual dos peixes marinhos do Sudeste do Brasil. II. Teleostei (1). S?o Paulo, Museu de Zoologia, USP, 110 p. 102 FIGUEIREDO, J. L. & MENEZES, N. A. 1980. Manual de peixes marinhos do Sudeste do Brasil. III. Teleostei (2). S?o Paulo, Museu de Zoologia USP, 90 p. FIGUEIREDO, J. L. & MENEZES, N. A. 2000. Manual de peixes marinhos do Sudeste do Brasil. VI. Teleostei (5). S?o Paulo, Museu de Zoologia USP, 116 p. FIGUEIREDO, J. L. 1977. Manual de peixes marinhos do Sudeste do Brasil.I. Introdu??o. Ca??es, Raias e Quimeras.S?o Paulo, Museu de Zoologia USP, 104p FRANCISCO, C. N. 2004. Subs?dios ? gest?o sustent?vel dos recursos h?dricos no ?mbito municipal: o caso de Angra dos Reis, RJ. Tese de doutorado. Universidade Federal Fluminense. 178 p. FRANCISCO, C.N. & CARVALHO, C. N. 2004. Disponibilidade H?drica: Da Vis?o Global ?s Pequenas Bacias Hidrogr?ficas: O Caso de Angra dos Reis. Revista de geoci?ncias, 3: 53-72. FROESE, R. & PAULY, D. 2006. Fish Base. Dispon?vel no site www.fishbase.org (acessado em outubro, 2008). GARCIA, A. M. & VIEIRA, J. P. 2001. O aumento da diversidade de peixes no estu?rio da Lagoa dos Patos durante o epis?dio El Ni?o 1997-1998. Atl?ntica Rio Grande, 23: 133- 152. GIANNINI, R. & PAIVA-FILHO A. M. 1990. Os Sciaenidae (Teleostei: Perciformes) da Ba?a de Santos, SP, Brasil. Boletim do Instituto Oceanogr?fico, 14: 3-12. GRIFT, R.E. 2001. How fish benefit from floodplain restoration along the lower River Rhine. Tese de doutorado. Wageningen University. 205 p. GUEDES, A. P. P. & ARA?JO, F. G. 2008. Trophic resource partitioning among five flatfish species (Actinopterygii, Pleuronectiformes) in a tropical bay in south-eastern Brazil. Journal of Fish Biology, 72: 1035?1054. HARRISON, T.D. & WHITFIELD, A.K. 2006. Temperature and salinity as primary determinants influencing the biogeography of fishes in South African estuaries. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 66: 335-345. HORNE, J. K. & CAMPANA, S. E. 1989. Environmental factors influencing the distribution of juvenile groundfish in nearshore habitats of Southwest Nova Scotia. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 46:1277?1284. IKEDA, Y.; GODOI, S. S. & CACCIARI, P. L. 1989. Um estudo de s?ries temporais de corrente na Ba?a de Ilha Grande, RJ. Relat?rio interno do Instituto Oceanogr?fico, Universidade de S?o Paulo, 28: 1-24. JAUREGUIZAR, A.J.; MENNI, R.; BREMEC, C.; MIANZAN, H. & LASTA, C. 2003. Fish assemblage and environmental patterns in the Rio de la Plata estuary. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 56: 921-933. 103 JOHNSTON, R. & SHEAVES, M. 2007. Small fish and crustaceans demonstrate a preference for particular small-scale habitats when mangrove forests are not accessible. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 353: 164?179. JOHNSTON, R.; SHEAVES, M. & MOLONY, B. 2007. Are distributions of fishes in tropical estuaries influenced by turbidity over small spatial scales? Journal of Fish Biology, 71: 657?671. J?NIOR, J. R. P.; CASTRO, A. C. L. & GOMES, L. N. 2005. Estrutura da comunidade de peixes do estu?rio do rio Anil, Ilha de S?o Luis, Maranh?o. Arquivos de Ci?ncias do Mar, 38: 29 ? 37. KEEFER, M. L.; PEERY, C. A.; WRIGHT, N.; et al. 2008. Evaluating the NOAA Coastal and Marine Ecological Classification Standard in estuarine systems: A Columbia River Estuary case study. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 78: 89-106. KJERFVE, B. 1987. Estuarine Geomorphology and Physical Oceanography. In. (Day Jr., J. W.; Hall, C. H. A. S.; Kemp, W. M. & Y??ez-Arancibia, A.; eds.). Estuarine Ecology. New York, Wiley, pp. 47-48. KNEIB, R.T. 1997. The role of tidal marshes in the ecology of estuarine nekton. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review, London, 34: 163-220. LAEDSGAARD, P & JOHNSON, C. 2001. Why do juvenile fish utilise mangrove habitats. Australia. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 257: 229-253. LAEGDSGAARD, P. & JOHNSON, C. R. 1995. Mangrove habitats as nurseries: unique assemblages of juvenile fish in subtropical mangroves in eastern Australia. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 126: 67?81. LAZZARI, M.A.; SHERMAN, S. & KANWIT, J.K. 2003. Nursery use of shallow habitats by epibenthic fishes in Maine nearshore waters. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 56: 73?84. MARSHALL, S. & ELLIOTT, M. 1998. Environmental influences on the fish assemblage of the Humber estuary, U.K. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Sciences, 46: 175?184. MARTINO, E. J. & ABLE, K. W. 2003. Fish assemblages across the marine to low salinity transition zone of a temperate estuary. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 56: 969? 987. MCCUNE, B & MEFFORD, M. J. 1997. Multivariate analysis of ecological data. MjM Software, Gleneden, Beach, Oregon, USA. MENEZES, N. A. & FIGUEIREDO, J. L. 1980. Manual de peixes marinhos do Sudeste do Brasil. VI. Teleostei (3). S?o Paulo, Museu de Zoologia USP, 96 p. MENEZES, N. A. & FIGUEIREDO, J. L. 1985. Manual de peixes marinhos do Sudeste do Brasil. VI. Teleostei (4). S?o Paulo, Museu de Zoologia USP, 105 p. 104 MILAGRE, R. R. 2004. Avalia??o da qualidade ambiental da Ba?a de Sepetiba atrav?s da estrutura tr?fica de esp?cies de peixes. Disserta??o de mestrado. Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro. 60 p. MIRANDA-MARURE, M. E.; MART?NEZ-P?REZ, J. A. & BROWN-PETERSON, N. J. 2004. Reproductive biology of the opossum pipefish, Microphis brachyurus lineatus, in Tecolutla Estuary, Veracruz, Mexico. Gulf and Caribbean Research, 16: 101?108. MUTO, E. Y.; SOARES, L. S. H. & ROSSI-WONGTSCHOWSKI, C. L. D. B. 2000. Demersal fish assemblages of S?o Sebasti?o, southeastern Brazil: structure and environmental conditioning factors (summer 1994). Revista Brasileira de Oceanografia, 48: 9-2. NEVES, L. M.; PEREIRA, H. H.; COSTA, M. R. & ARA?JO, F. G. 2006. Uso do manguezal de Guaratiba, Ba?a de Sepetiba, RJ pelo peixe-rei Atherinella brasiliensis (Quoy & Gaimard) (Atheriniformes, Atherinopsidae). Revista brasileira de Zoologia, 23: 420 ? 428. NORDLIE, F. G. & D. C. HANEY, 1993. Euryhaline adaptations in the fat sleeper, Dormitator maculatus. Journal of Fish Biology, 43: 433?439. PAIVA, A. C. G.; CHAVES, P. T. C. & ARA?JO, M. E. 2008. Estrutura e organiza??o tr?fica da ictiofauna de ?guas rasas em um estu?rio tropical. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia, 25: 647-661. PEASE, B. C. 1999. A spatially oriented analysis of estuaries and their associated commercial Fisheries in New South Wales, Australia. Fisheries Research, 42: 67-86 PEREIRA, L. E. 1994. Varia??o sazonal e diurnal dos peixes demersais na Barra do estu?rio da Lagoa dos Patos, RJ. Alt?ntica, Rio Grande, 16: 5-21. PESSANHA, A. L. M. & ARA?JO, F. G. 2003. Spatial, temporal and diel variations of fish assemblages at two sandy beaches in the Sepetiba Bay, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 57: 817?828. PESSANHA, A. L. M. 2006. Rela??es tr?ficas de tr?s esp?cies de peixes abundantes (Eucinostomus argenteus, Diapterus rhombeus e Micropogonias furnieri) na Ba?a de Sepetiba. Tese de doutorado. Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro. 161 p. RAY-GUZMAN, A. & HUIDOBRO, L. 2002. Fish communities in two environmentally different estuarine systems of M?xico. Journal of Fish Biology, 61: 182-195. REIS, R. E., KULLANDER, S. O.; FERRARIS, JR. C. J. 2003. Check list of the freshwater fishes of South and Central America. Porto Alegre: EDIPUC/RS, 742 p. ROBERTSON, A. I. & BLABER, S. J. M. 1992. Plankton, epibenthos and fish communities. In Tropical Mangrove Ecosystems (Robertson, A. I. & Alongi, D.M., eds). American Geophysical Union, Washington DC, pp. 173-224. 105 RODRIGUES, C.; LAVRADO, H. P.; FALC?O, A. P. C. & SILVA, S. H. G. 2007. Distribui??o da ictiofauna capturada em arrastos de fundo na Ba?a de Guanabara ? Rio de janeiro, Brasil. Arquivos do Museu Nacional, 65: 199-210. ROY, P. S.; WILLIAMS, R. J.; JONES, A. R.; YASSINI, I.; GIBBS, P. J.; B. COATES.; WEST, R. J.; SCANES, P. R.; HUDSON, J. P. & NICHOL, S. 2001. Structure and Function of South-east Australian Estuaries. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 53: 351?384. S?NCHEZ-GIL, P.; Y??EZ-ARANCIBIA, A.; TAPIA, M.; DAY, W. P.; WILSON, C. A. & COWAN JR, J. H. 2008. Ecological and biological strategies of Etropus crossotus and Citharichthys spilopterus (Pleuronectiformes: Paralichthyidae) related to the estuarine plume, Southern Gulf of Mexico. Journal of Sea Research, 59: 173?185. SELLESLAGH, J. & AMARA, R. 2008. Environmental factors structuring fish composition and assemblages in a small macrotidal estuary (eastern English Channel). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 79: 507?517. SIMERJ. 2009. Sistema de Metereologia do Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Governo do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Secretaria de Ci?ncias e Tecnologia. Dispon?vel no site www. www.simerj.com/defaut_rjclima.php (acessado em janeiro, 2009). SINDILARIU, P.; FREYHOF, J.; WOLTER, C. 2006. Habitat use of juvenile fish in the lower Danube and the Danube Delta: implications for ecotone connectivity. Hydrobiologia, 571: 51?61. TEIXEIRA, R. L. 1994. Abundance, reproductive period, and feeding habits of eleotrid fishes in estuarine habitats of north-east Brazil. Journal of Fish Biology, 45: 749?761. THIEL, R.; SEPULVEDA, A.; KAFERMAN, R. & NELLEN, W. 1995. Environmental factors as forces structuring the fish community of the Elbe estuary. Journal of Fish Biology, 46: 47-69. VALESINI, F. J.; POTTER, I. C.; PLATELL, M. E. & HYNDES, G. A. 1997. Ichthyofaunas of a temperate estuary and adjacent marine embayment. Implications regarding choice of nursery area and influence of environmental changes. Marine Biology, 128: 317-328. VAN DEN BRINK, F. W. B.; VAN DER VELDE, G.; BUIJSE, A. D. & KLINK, A. G. 1996. Biodiversity in the lower Rhine and Meuse river-floodplains: its significance for ecological river management. Netherlands Journal of Aquatic Ecology, 30: 129?149. VIEIRA, J. P. 1985. Distribui??o, abund?ncia e alimenta??o dos jovens de Mugilidae no estu?rio da Lagoa dos Patos e movimentos reprodutivos da Tainha (Mugil platanus G?nther, 1880) no litoral sul do Brasil. Disserta??o de Mestrado,Universidade do Rio Grande, 104 p. VON SPERLING, E. & BALTAZAR, O. F. 1983. Projeto carta geol?gica do estado do Rio de Janeiro. Folhas Mangaratiba, Ilha Grande, Cunhambebe, Angra dos Reis, rio Mambucaba/campos de Cunha, Parati, Cunha, Picinguaba e Juatinga. Relat?rio final, volume I, DRM-CPRM, Belo Horizonte, 122 p. 106 WHITFIELD A.K. 1983. Factors influencing the utilization of southern African estuaries by fishes. South African Journal of Science, 79: 362?365. WHITFIELD, A. K. & M. ELLIOTT. 2002. Fishes as indicators of environmental and ecological changes within estuaries: a review of progress and some suggestions for the future. Journal of Fish Biology, 61: 229-250. WHITFIELD, A. K. 1999. Ichthyofaunal assemblages in estuaries: A South African case study. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 9: 151?186. WHITFIELD, A. K.; TAYLOR, R. H.; FOX, C. & CYRUS, D. P. 2006. Fishes and salinities in the St Lucia estuarine system- a review. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 16:1?20. WINEMILLER, K. O. & PONWITH, B. J. 1998. Comparative ecology of eleotrid fishes in Central America coastal streams. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 53: 373-384. ZAR, J. H. 1996. Biostatistical Analysis. 3 rd edition. Prentice may, Englewoods Cliffs.662 p. |
Page generated in 0.005 seconds