Return to search

Computational Delineation of Built-up Area at Urban Block Level from Topographic Maps: A Contribution to Retrospective Monitoring of Urban Dynamics

Among many others, one general goal of the UN sustainability strategies aims at reducing the anthropogenic land change due to land take for settlements and transport infrastructure. To monitor the success of this goal and to comprehensively study and better understand these urban dynamic processes – such as densification, growth and sprawl, or shrinkage –, quantitative measurements were introduced to assist the assessment. For the analysis of urban dynamics, the built-up area is an important measure that can be considered at different scales, one common scale being the aggregated level of urban blocks that represent a group of developed parcels bounded by topographic borders such as street lines. Regardless of the scale of quantitative analysis, however, digital spatio-temporal data are essential. While comprehensive databases exist for contemporary data, they usually lack a historic dimension.

To derive these historic data about the built-up area, potential surveying methods and sources may vary. Considering the long-term characteristic of urban land change, however, topographic maps often are the only source for small-scale, spatially explicit land cover information to build a comprehensive, spatio-temporal database of built-up area, which has been demonstrated by numerous studies. However, the manual constitution of historic geographic data based on historic maps – commonly referred to as map digitization or vectorization – is a time consuming and laborious process that limits the spatial and temporal scope and, therefore, opposes comprehensive studies. Therefore, this thesis proposes an approach to automatically extract information about the built-up area at urban block level from historic topographic maps.

For a number of reasons, this is a challenging task. First, topographic maps show a high degree of informational density and complexity due to their layer concept. These layers of geographic objects generally overlap leading to the (multi-)fragmentation or fusion of distinct geographic map objects. While this may not pose a challenge to a human interpreter, it does for the formalization of the computational object recognition. Second, material aging of the document as well as a poor scanning or image compression process may result in a reduced graphical quality. Third, object representations including the use of color, if present at all, show an immense diversity over space and time. To overcome these challenges in regard to cartographical image analysis, a modular process has been designed pursuing a two-step strategy: a decomposition of salient map layers is succeeded by a re-composition of the structuring map objects to delineate the built-up area at urban block level.

Several experiments prove this process to achieve acceptable results with correctness values ranging from 0.97 to 0.93 for three German study maps. Behind the background of a global trend to digitize knowledge that can also be observed with historic topographic maps, the designed process represents a promising approach to efficiently prepare these historic data for integration into a spatio-temporal database of built-up area with minimal user intervention.:Declaration of Authorship
Acknowledgements
Summary
Contents
List of Figures
List of Tables
List of Abbreviations

1 Introduction
1.1 Scope
1.2 Challenges
1.3 Research Questions
1.4 Structure

2 Principles of Image Analysis
2.1 Human Visual Perception
2.2 Methods of Image Analyis
2.2.1 Image Segmentation
2.2.1.1 Color Image Segmentation
2.2.1.2 Texture-based Segmentation
2.2.1.3 Morphology-based Segmentation
2.2.1.4 Further Segmentation Approaches
2.2.2 Object/Pattern Recognition
2.2.2.1 Strategies in Pattern Recognition
2.2.2.2 Approaches in Pattern Recognition
2.2.3 Object Reconstruction
2.2.3.1 Reconstruction of Contours
2.2.3.2 Raster-vector Conversion
2.3 Summary

3 Cartographic Image Analysis
3.1 Geoinformation from Cartographic Raster Maps
3.1.1 Raster Maps
3.1.2 Research History
3.1.3 Research – State of the Art
3.1.3.1 Separation of Raster Layers based on Color
3.1.3.2 Extraction and Recognition of Map Objects
3.1.3.3 Automated Georeferencing
3.1.4 Delineation of Built-up Area from Cartographic Raster Maps
3.2 Further Sources for the Delineation of Built-up Area
3.3 Summary and Interim Conclusions

4 Concept and Methodology
4.1 Concept - Preliminary Considerations
4.1.1 Defining the Subject of Delineatoin – the Urban Block
4.1.2 Data Characteristics
4.1.3 Cartographical Representation and Higher-Level Demarcation of Built-up Area
4.2 Methodological Design
4.2.1 Requirements to the Process and the Input Data
4.2.2 General Methodical Approach
4.2.3 Derivation of the General Delineation Process
4.2.4 Module Map Objects
4.2.4.1 Building Symbols
4.2.4.2 Residential Area Hatching
4.2.4.3 Railroads and Tramlines
4.2.5 Module Street Block Delineation
4.2.5.1 Street Network
4.2.5.2 Reconstruction of Street Block Objects
4.2.5.3 Evaluation of Street Block Objects
4.2.6 Delineation of Built-up Area
4.2.6.1 Module Building Grouping
4.2.6.2 Module Built-up Area
4.3 Implementation

5 Evaluation and Discussions
5.1 Evaluation Frameset
5.1.1 Study Maps
5.1.2 Reference Data
5.1.3 Methodology
5.2 Experiments and Results
5.2.1 Experiments
5.2.1.1 E.0 – Delineate Built-up Area Using the General Process
5.2.1.2 E.1 – Delineate Built-up Area Using a Deviation of the General Process
5.2.1.3 E.2 – Delineate Built-up Area Using Maps with Varying Spatial Resolution
5.2.2 Results
5.2.2.1 R.0 – Delineation Results of the General Process
5.2.2.2 R.1 – Delineation Results of the Deviated Process Variants
5.2.2.3 R.2 – Delineation Results of the Deviated Map Resolution Variants
5.3 Discussions
5.3.1 Strengths and Limitations
5.3.2 Comparision of Delineation Results to other Studies
5.3.3 Applications and Transferability to other Maps

6 Conclusion and Outlook
6.1 Revising the Research Questions
6.2 Scientific Contribution
6.3 Future Research Perspectives

References
Appendix
A.1 List of Process Parameters and their Application
A.2 Exemplary Delineation Results

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:DRESDEN/oai:qucosa:de:qucosa:34036
Date20 May 2019
CreatorsMuhs, Sebastian
ContributorsBurghardt, Dirk, Burghardt, Dirk, Thinh, Nguyen Xuan, Meinel, Gotthard, Technische Universität Dresden
Source SetsHochschulschriftenserver (HSSS) der SLUB Dresden
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typedoc-type:doctoralThesis, info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis, doc-type:Text
Rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Page generated in 0.0023 seconds