Submitted by Setor de Tratamento da Informa??o - BC/PUCRS (tede2@pucrs.br) on 2016-06-10T16:37:24Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
DIS_FELIPE_WAQUIL_FERRARO_PARCIAL.pdf: 380164 bytes, checksum: c97ad494e35f29c3ff8674f723e68f81 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-06-10T16:37:24Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
DIS_FELIPE_WAQUIL_FERRARO_PARCIAL.pdf: 380164 bytes, checksum: c97ad494e35f29c3ff8674f723e68f81 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2016-02-29 / Television is a specific form of cultural expression of a particular people. In this sense, the influence of the television and American movies in the rest of the world is overwhelming, with a reference to the public and society in general. This influence can also be seen in the legal world. American cinemas are rich in films with courts in which lawyers masterfully dominate the causes, the evidence, the witnesses and the jury. It has also, throughout the North American legal culture shown on tv series, that are broadcast in several countries. Thus, it is huge the influence of television on the culture of a society, which has often clients leaving of an audience really disappointed because the lawyer didn?t won the case, not constrains the other party to give up the case or did not show all his oratory to the judge. Finally, at the end of an ordinary audience of Civil Law, still hears "It's that all, counselor?" In this regard, the appeal by the shock, characteristic of the Common Law system, deserves a detailed analysis. This analysis will be done from the testimonial evidence. Thus, this dissertation aims to verify the contrast between Brazilian Law (Civil Law) and the US Law (Common Law), as well, the elements which approach and contrast them, especially about the testimonial evidence, specifically in its rules exclusion and
valuation systems. Therefore, we?ll see, the systematic structure of the Law of the United States, starting from the Constitution (Bill of Rights), passing by federal rules (Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Federal Rules of Evidence) to the traditional issues such as exclusion rules and the civil jury. Then, we will analyze the problem of studying distinct systems as Civil Law and Common Law, knowing that it allows us a wide view of the elements that distinguish them. In this regard, we have the investigation of orality in the US Common Law system, in front of the jury figure and the form of inquiry and influence witnesses. Therefore, we?ll see the exclusion rules and the assessment of the evidence based on the US legal system, as also, see the absolute need for a proper understanding of evidentiary standards. At the end, you can not only see the influence of American law, but also understand their particularities, pros and cons, across the Brazilian law. / A televis?o ? uma forma de express?o cultural espec?fica de um determinado povo. E nesse sentido, a influ?ncia da televis?o e do cinema americano no resto do mundo ? avassaladora, sendo uma refer?ncia para o p?blico e a sociedade de um modo geral. Tal influ?ncia tamb?m se verifica no mundo jur?dico. O cinema estadunidense ? riqu?ssimo em filmes de tribunais em que advogados com maestria dominam ?s causas, as provas, os testemunhos e o j?ri. Tem-se tamb?m, toda a cultura jur?dica norte americana mostrada em seriados, os quais s?o transmitidos em diversos pa?ses do mundo. Dessa forma, tamanha ? a influ?ncia da televis?o sobre a cultura de uma sociedade, que n?o raras vezes clientes saem decepcionados de uma audi?ncia, pois seu advogado n?o ganhou a causa naquele momento, n?o constrangeu a outra parte a desistir do processo, n?o demonstrou todo sua orat?ria perante o juiz da causa. E ao final de uma ordin?ria audi?ncia de Civil Law, ainda se ouve ?Mas ? s? isso doutor??. Nesse aspecto, o encanto pelos embates pr?prios do sistema do Common Law, merece uma an?lise pormenorizada. An?lise, esta, feita a
partir da prova testemunhal. Assim, a presente disserta??o tem por objetivo verificar, diante da contraposi??o entre o Direito brasileiro (Civil Law) e o Direto estadunidense (Common Law), os elementos que lhes aproxima e os que lhes contrastam, no que cinge a prova testemunhal, especificamente nas suas regras de exclus?o e sistemas de valora??o. Visualiza-se, para tanto, a estrutura sistem?tica do Direito dos Estados Unidos da Am?rica, partindo de sua Constitui??o (Bill of Rights), perpassando pelas regras federais (Federal Rules of Civil Procedure e Federal Rules of Evidence) at? as quest?es tradicionais como as regras de exclus?o e da figura do j?ri c?vel. Verificar-se-?, assim, a problem?tica do estudo de distintos sistemas, como Civil Law e Common Law, mas que possibilitar? uma ampla vis?o dos elementos que lhes distinguem. Tem-se, nesse aspecto, a averigua??o da oralidade no sistema do Common Law estadunidense frente ? figura do j?ri e ? forma de inquiri??o e influ?ncia das testemunhas. Por conseguinte, examinar-se-?o
as regras de exclus?o, bem como a valora??o das provas com base no sistema legal estadunidense, al?m da imprescindibilidade de uma compreens?o adequada dos standards probat?rios. Ao final, ser? poss?vel verificar, n?o s? a influ?ncia do Direito estadunidense, mas entender suas particularidades, pontos positivos e negativos, frente ao Direito brasileiro.
Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/6762 |
Date | 29 February 2016 |
Creators | Ferraro, Felipe Waquil |
Contributors | Tesheiner, Jos? Maria Rosa |
Publisher | Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Direito, PUCRS, Brasil, Faculdade de Direito |
Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
Language | Portuguese |
Detected Language | English |
Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
Format | application/pdf |
Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, instacron:PUC_RS |
Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Relation | -1046629855937119302, 600, 600, 600, 2194221341323903125, -7277407233034425144 |
Page generated in 0.8843 seconds