abstract: The profession known as industrial design is undergoing a transformation. Design thinking and strategy are replacing form giving and styling. Critics are calling for curricular reform to meet the changing needs of practice, yet surprisingly little knowledge is available about how and why design teachers do what they do. In an effort to frame the problem of (re)designing design education, this study provides a framework for understanding the pedagogical beliefs and preferences of design students and educators utilizing Bruner’s four folk pedagogies. This study also provides evidence that the practices of industrial design teachers exhibit what Cross (2006) has described as ‘designerly ways of knowing.’ / Dissertation/Thesis / Doctoral Dissertation Design 2020
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:asu.edu/item:57319 |
| Date | January 2020 |
| Contributors | Christensen, Tamara Fawn (Author), Nocek, Adam (Advisor), Brooks, Kenneth (Advisor), Heywood, William (Committee member), Henriksen, Danah (Committee member), Mishra, Punya (Committee member), Arizona State University (Publisher) |
| Source Sets | Arizona State University |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | Doctoral Dissertation |
| Format | 368 pages |
| Rights | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ |
Page generated in 0.002 seconds