Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2018-02-15T11:42:46Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
AbraaoLuizFilgueiraLopes_DISSERT.pdf: 1298278 bytes, checksum: cda5082119820f6c75ddbf07943759dc (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2018-02-16T13:12:08Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
AbraaoLuizFilgueiraLopes_DISSERT.pdf: 1298278 bytes, checksum: cda5082119820f6c75ddbf07943759dc (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-02-16T13:12:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
AbraaoLuizFilgueiraLopes_DISSERT.pdf: 1298278 bytes, checksum: cda5082119820f6c75ddbf07943759dc (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2017-11-10 / O presente trabalho analisa o significado da democracia e do direito fundamental de participa??o do povo na forma??o da vontade pol?tica, em especial sob o prisma das inelegibilidades infraconstitucionais absolutas reformuladas pela Lei da Ficha Limpa, propondo uma interpreta??o dessas inelegibilidades calcadas nos princ?pios constitucionais eleitorais. Num contexto em que a opini?o p?blica e a popula??o pressionam por uma aplica??o firme das normas de inelegibilidade, debate a necessidade de compatibilizar o direito fundamental ? cidadania passiva com o princ?pio da legitimidade das elei??es e da moralidade para o exerc?cio do mandato, em an?lise perpassada pelo princ?pio da estrita legalidade eleitoral. Para tanto, lan?a m?o do m?todo dedutivo, partindo de premissas alcan?adas segundo an?lise bibliogr?fica, sem deixar de fora, por?m, uma an?lise cr?tica da jurisprud?ncia do Tribunal Superior Eleitoral a partir da utiliza??o do m?todo dial?tico. Observa que a democracia pressup?e coexist?ncia n?o s? de ideias, mas tamb?m da maioria e das minorias, que h?o de participar com liberdade do governo estatal. A partir da?, identifica a candidatura como um direito fundamental, que n?o pode sofrer restri??es gratuitas e desatreladas de um valor maior que justifique a limita??o. Constatando que as inelegibilidades s?o limita??es negativas do direito ? candidatura, prop?e sejam as regras de inelegibilidade interpretadas segundo o princ?pio que lhes confere sentido e significado, o que passa pela observ?ncia de m?todos hermen?uticos, como a m?xima efetividade. Conclui interpretando as inelegibilidades decorrentes de condena??es por abuso de poder pol?tico e econ?mico, crimes, il?citos eleitorais que podem levar ? cassa??o, improbidade administrativa, al?m daquela resultante da desaprova??o de contas de gestores p?blicos. / This study analyzes the meaning of democracy and the fundamental right of people to participate in the formation of political will, especially under the prism of absolute infraconstitutional ineligibilities reformulated by the ?Lei da Ficha Limpa?, proposing an interpretation of these ineligibilities based on electoral constitutional principles. In a context in which public opinion and the population press for a firm application of the rules of ineligibility, it debates the need to reconcile the fundamental right to passive citizenship with the principle of the legitimacy of elections and morality for the exercise of the mandate, in analysis by the principle of strict electoral legality. In order to do so, it relies on the deductive method, based on assumptions reached according to bibliographical analysis, without, however, leaving aside a critical analysis of the jurisprudence of the Superior Electoral Court from the use of the dialectical method. It notes that democracy presupposes the coexistence not only of ideas, but also of the majority and of minorities, who will participate freely in the state government. From there, it identifies the candidacy as a fundamental right, which can not suffer free and unfettered restrictions of a greater value that justifies the limitation. Noting that the ineligibilities are negative limitations of the right to the candidacy, it proposes that the rules of ineligibilities are interpreted according to the principle that confers meaning, which passes through the observance of hermeneutical methods, as the maximum effectiveness. It concludes by interpreting the ineligibility resulting from convictions for abuse of political and economic power, crimes, electoral illicit acts capable of leading to the cassation, administrative improbity, besides that resulting from the disapproval of accounts of public managers.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/24735 |
| Date | 10 November 2017 |
| Creators | Lopes, Abra?o Luiz Filgueira |
| Contributors | 70410070491, Ros?rio, Jos? Orlando Ribeiro, 09610294553, Souza, Marcelo Alves Dias de, 66484944415, Pereira, Erick Wilson |
| Publisher | PROGRAMA DE P?S-GRADUA??O EM DIREITO, UFRN, Brasil |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Source | reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN, instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, instacron:UFRN |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0826 seconds