Made available in DSpace on 2015-07-22T20:49:36Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0
Previous issue date: 2010-08-25 / Com os avancos dos recursos da Word Wide Web, os beneficios obtidos sao incontestaveis tambem na area da educacao. Apesar de sua ampla disseminacao, podem apresentar falhas que os tornam inadequados. Uma das maneiras de se evitar os infortunios causados por websites mal estruturados seria a realizacao de avaliacoes de sua qualidade. Pesquisadores do Nucleo de Informatica em Enfermagem da Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo (UNIFESP) desenvolveram em parceria com o Departamento de Informatica em Saude da UNIFESP um website educacional em Primeiros Socorros. Considerando-se a relevancia do ensino e a necessidade de investir em ferramentas informativas de qualidade sobre o tema objetivou-se neste estudo: elaborar e validar instrumentos de avaliacao de website e avaliar o website em Primeiros Socorros. Tres instrumentos foram criados para avaliar a estrutura, o conteudo e a navegabilidade. Verificou-se que esses instrumentos foram adequados para o uso na avaliacao do website, por apresentarem niveis superiores ao Limite de Seguranca .0,70 estabelecido. Em relacao a qualidade do website, observou-se que o valor de Kappa foi de 0,047 e -0,062 na analise das respostas dos profissionais de informatica e da saude, respectivamente, indicando que nao houve concordancia nas respostas. No entanto, na analise da distribuicao das respostas dos avaliadores percebeu-se que, segundo os profissionais de informatica, a qualidade estrutural do website deveria ser revista e corrigida para torna-lo adequado. Ja em relacao a distribuicao dos escores assinalados pelos profissionais da area da saude observou-se que a qualidade de conteudo do website e boa e que deveriam ser feitas pequenas correcoes de alguns conteudos. A avaliacao da qualidade de navegabilidade do website, segundo a opiniao dos alunos e boa, conforme o escore obtido de 79,4%. Observou-se que tanto os profissionais da saude como os alunos referiram que a distribuicao dos links deveria ser melhorada, semelhante as recomendacoes dos profissionais de informatica. Concluiu-se que: os tres instrumentos elaborados foram considerados adequados para a utilizacao da avaliacao do website. A qualidade estrutural do website deve ser corrigida, para que o processo de navegacao seja adequado e embora a qualidade do conteudo seja boa, pequenas correcoes nas informacoes devem ser realizadas. / The advancement of the Word Wide Web has brought remarkable benefits to all areas of activity including education. Despite the broad spreading of websites, some flaws may exist, which could make them inadequate. A way of avoiding potencial problems caused by websites with poor structure is to regularly evaluate their quality. Researchers from the Nursing Informatics Center at Federal University of Sao Paulo (UNIFESP) developed in a partnership with the Health Informatics Department at UNIFESP an educational website First Aid. Considering the relevance of teaching and the need to invest in quality educational tools the objective of this study was to create and validate a website evaluation tool and use it to evaluate the First Aid website. Three instruments were created to evaluate the structure, the content and the accessibility. The instrument was applied to informaticists, health care professionals and students. It was found that these instruments were adequate for evaluating the website, as they presented levels above the established LS.0.70. Regarding the quality of the website, it was found that the Kappa value was 0.047 and -0.062 for the analyses of the responses from informaticists and healthcare professionals, respectively, indicating a lack of agreement in the responses. However, the analysis of the distribution of the informaticists responses found that the structure of the website should be reviewed and corrected to make it more adequate. As for the distribution of the scores analyzed by healthcare professionals it was observed that the quality of the content on the website was good and only a few corrections should be made in the content. According to the students, the website accessibility is good with a score of 79.35%. It was also observed that healthcare professionals as well as students referred that the links should be better distributed, which is in agreement with the recommendations of the informaticists. In conclusion, the three developed instruments were considered adequate for evaluating the website. The quality of the structure quality should be corrected so that accessibility would be more adequate. Although the quality was considered good, small correction should be made to improve the content. / TEDE / BV UNIFESP: Teses e dissertações
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.unifesp.br:11600/9099 |
| Date | 25 August 2010 |
| Creators | Mori, Satomi [UNIFESP] |
| Contributors | Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), Marin, Heimar de Fatima [UNIFESP] |
| Publisher | Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | 126 p. |
| Source | reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP, instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo, instacron:UNIFESP |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0028 seconds