Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-11-03T21:39:42Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
KeivertonRonesGurgelPaiva_DISSERT.pdf: 1038992 bytes, checksum: 838139b553fcb29873b38407992a06de (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-11-18T00:06:45Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
KeivertonRonesGurgelPaiva_DISSERT.pdf: 1038992 bytes, checksum: 838139b553fcb29873b38407992a06de (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-11-18T00:06:45Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
KeivertonRonesGurgelPaiva_DISSERT.pdf: 1038992 bytes, checksum: 838139b553fcb29873b38407992a06de (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2017-07-25 / Introdu??o: Os aspectos subjetivos e a opini?o do paciente devem ser considerados nas reabilita??es unit?rias sobre implante em ?rea est?tica. Proposi??o: Avaliar o efeito da reabilita??o unit?ria provis?ria implantossuportada sobre a satisfa??o e qualidade de vida dos indiv?duos. Metodologia: Estudo transversal que visa avaliar pacientes reabilitados com coroas unit?rias provis?rias sobre implantes em ?rea est?tica quanto ? qualidade de vida, atrav?s do uso de dois question?rios (OIDP e OHIP-14) e quanto ? satisfa??o, por meio de escala visual anal?gica. Ambas an?lises foram realizadas previamente e ap?s a reabilita??o com as coroas provis?rias. Bem como, determinar a partir da diferen?a m?nima a ser detectada de m?dias, igual a 2,00 para o OHIP-14 e para a Satisfa??o o tamanho amostral ideal para se encontrar uma diferen?a estatisticamente significante. Resultados: Obteve-se uma amostra de 10 pacientes para este estudo dos quais sete tinham a aus?ncia de um incisivo superior. O OIDP demonstrou que a qualidade de vida apresentou impacto positivo em todas as performances ap?s a reabilita??o, entretanto duas performances ainda permaneceram com impacto negativo (comer e limpeza da boca), por?m menores que anterior ? interven??o. O score m?dio do OHIP-14 demonstrou que houve melhora na qualidade de vida tendo uma redu??o no seu valor de 23,3%. Quanto ? satisfa??o houve uma melhora ap?s o procedimento em todos os aspectos. Realizando o c?lculo amostral com as diferen?as m?nimas a serem detectadas (igual a 2,00 para ambas as tem?ticas estudadas) encontrou-se uma amostra variando de 11 a 54, e de 16 a 62, para qualidade de vida e satisfa??o, respectivamente. Conclus?o: O tamanho amostral de 62 pacientes parece ser o ideal para se estabelecer uma diferen?a significativa ao longo do tempo, visando determinar o efeito da reabilita??o prot?tica provis?ria implantossuportada unit?ria sobre a qualidade de vida e satisfa??o dos pacientes. / Introduction: The subjective aspects and patient opinion should be considered in single-implant treatment in aesthetic area. Proposition: To evaluate the effect of provisional single-implant crowns on the satisfaction and quality of life of individuals. Methodology: a cross-sectional study aiming to evaluate patients who were rehabilitated with provisional single-implant crowns in the aesthetic area regarding quality of life, using two questionnaires (OHIP-14 and OIDP), and satisfaction, using a visual analog scale. The evaluation was performed before and after rehabilitation with the provisional crowns. As well as, to determine from the minimum difference to be detected of means, equal to 2.00 for the OHIP-14 and for Satisfaction the ideal sample size to find a statistically significant difference. Results: A sample of 10 patients was obtained for this study of which seven had the absence of a superior incisor. The OIDP shown that quality of life had a positive impact on all performances after rehabilitation, however two performances still remained with negative impact (eating and mouth cleaning), but smaller than before the intervention. The mean score of OHIP-14 showed that there was an improvement in quality of life having a reduction in its value of 23.3%. For the satisfaction there was an improvement after the procedure in all aspects. A sample ranging from 11 to 54 and from 16 to 62, for quality of life and satisfaction, respectively, was found to make the sample calculation with the minimum differences to be detected (equal to 2.00 for both subjects). Conclusion: The sample size of 62 patients seems to be the ideal to establish a significant difference over time, aiming to determine the effect of provisional implant-supported prosthetic rehabilitation on quality of life and patient satisfaction.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/24300 |
| Date | 25 July 2017 |
| Creators | Paiva, K?iverton Rones Gurgel |
| Contributors | 28790445880, Barbosa, Gustavo Augusto Seabra, 00794853404, Batista, Andr? Ulisses Dantas, 02411702493, Calderon, Patricia dos Santos |
| Publisher | PROGRAMA DE P?S-GRADUA??O EM SA?DE COLETIVA, UFRN, Brasil |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Source | reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN, instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, instacron:UFRN |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0022 seconds