Return to search

Influ?ncia da desidrata??o epid?rmica sobre a efic?cia pulguicida do fipronil empregado por via t?pica em c?es / Influence of epidermal dehydration on pulguicida effectiveness of fipronil used topically in dogs

Submitted by Celso Magalhaes (celsomagalhaes@ufrrj.br) on 2017-10-31T16:02:37Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
2015 - Tiago Abrah?o Pereira Nunes.pdf: 1105331 bytes, checksum: 0181da3c6f09beb15f83949f7e054ee8 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-10-31T16:02:37Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
2015 - Tiago Abrah?o Pereira Nunes.pdf: 1105331 bytes, checksum: 0181da3c6f09beb15f83949f7e054ee8 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2015-02-26 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior - CAPES / The objective of the study was to evaluate the influence of epidermal dehydration on the parasiticide effective of fipronil 10% ?spot on? in dogs artificially infested with Ctenocephalides felis felis. For this, 24 Beagles were used, divided into four groups of six dogs each. The dogs on the control groups were not treated, while the dogs on the treated group I e II and III were treated with the formulation of 10% fipronil ??spot on??. The dogs on treated group I were submitted to weekly baths with neutral glycerin soap. The dogs on treated group II were submitted to 21 consecutive and daily baths with benzoyl peroxide 2,5% shampoo. Dogs treated group III were submitted to the same baths made in treated group II, however, undergo biweekly applications of lipid formulation (containing ceramides, cholesterol and fatty acids), until the end of the study. The dogs in the control group, treated group I, treated group II and treated group III were infested with 50 pairs of C. felis felis. Infestations were performed on days -2, +5, +12, +19, +26, +33, +40, +47, +54 and, on days +2, +7, +14, +21, +28, +35, +42, +49 and +56, fleas were mechanical removed and counted for evaluation. Pulicide efficacy for treated group I on days +2, +7, +14, +21, +28, +35, +42, +49 and +56, were respectively 100%; 100%; 100%; 100%; 100%; 100%; 100%; 76.25% and 72,47%. The pulicide efficacy for the treated group II, evaluated on the same days, were respectively 100%; 100%; 100%; 100%; 100%; 97.35%; 92.86%; 82.85% and 71.21%. The pulicide efficacy for the treated group III, evaluated on the same days, were respectively 100%; 100%; 100%; 100%; 100%; 100%; 99.49%; 28.23% and 27.53%. The comparative statistical analysis between the averages of live fleas, between the control and treated groups I and between the control group and treated II showed that there was a significant difference (p?0,05) for the challenges in all experimental days, after treatment. In the comparison between the control group and treated III, showed a significant difference (p?0,05) for the challenges until day 42. No more having significant difference (p?0,05) in the experimental day +49 and +56. Statistical analysis between the treated groups I and II and treated II and III showed that there was no significant difference (p?0,05) for the challenges in all experimental days. The analysis of the treaty I and III, determined that there was no significant difference (p?0,05) until day 49, a significant difference (p?0,05) on day +56. Fipronil was effective in eliminating fleas on dogs until the day + 56 with no more residual protective effect when the animals were reinfested. The induced of epidermal dehydration, does not determined changes on the efficacy or decreased the residual effect of fipronil when used in dogs subjected to exposure of populations of C. felis felis,, through weekly infestations. This fact was confirmed since the lipid formulation of applications, were not able, in turn, to determine more effective and prolonged residual effect of fipronil when used in dogs undergoing exposure populations of C. felis felis on weekly infestation. / O objetivo do trabalho foi avaliar a influ?ncia da desidrata??o epid?rmica sobre a efic?cia pulguicida do fipronil empregado por via t?pica em c?es. Foram utilizados 24 c?es da ra?a Beagle, compondo seis animais por grupo. Os c?es foram divididos em quatro grupos. Os c?es do grupo controle n?o receberam tratamento, enquanto que os c?es dos grupos tratados I, II e III receberam tratamento com formula??o de fipronil 10% ??spot on??. Os c?es do grupo tratado I foram submetidos a banhos semanais com sabonete de glicerina neutro. Os c?es do grupo tratado II foram submetidos a 21 dias de banhos consecutivos e di?rios com shampoo contendo per?xido de benzo?la 2,5%. Os c?es do grupo tratado III foram submetidos ao mesmo regime de banhos do grupo tratado II, por?m, nesses c?es, somou-se aos banhos, aplica??es quinzenais de formula??o lip?dica (contendo ceramidas, colesterol e ?cidos graxos), at? o t?rmino do estudo. Os c?es dos grupos controle, tratado I, tratado II e tratado III foram infestados com 50 casais de C. felis felis. As infesta??es foram realizadas nos dias, -2, +5, +12, +19, +26, +33, +40, +47 e +54 e, nos dias +2, +7, +14, +21, +28, +35, +42, +49 e +56, realizou-se a retirada mec?nica e contagem de pulgas para avalia??o. As efic?cias pulguicidas, para o grupo tratado I, nos dias +2, +7, +14, +21, +28, +35, +42, +49 e +56, foram, respectivamente: 100%; 100%; 100%; 100%; 100%; 100%, 100%; 76,25% e 72,47%. As efic?cias pulguicidas, para o grupo tratado II, avaliadas nos mesmos dias, foram respectivamente: 100%; 100%; 100%; 100%; 100%; 97,35%; 92,86%; 82,85% e 71,21%. As efic?cias pulguicidas para o grupo tratado III, avaliadas nos mesmos dias, foram respectivamente: 100%; 100%; 100%; 100%; 100%; 100%; 99,49% e 28,23% e 27,53%. A an?lise estat?stica comparativa entre as m?dias de pulgas vivas, entre os grupos controle e tratado I e entre o grupo controle e tratado II, demonstrou que ocorreu diferen?a significativa (p?0,05) para os desafios em todos os dias experimentais, ap?s o tratamento. J? na compara??o entre o grupo controle e tratado III, evidenciou-se diferen?a significativa (p?0,05) para os desafios at? o dia +42. N?o mais havendo diferen?a significativa (p?0,05) no dia experimental +49 e +56. A an?lise estat?stica entre os grupos tratados I e II e tratado II e III demonstrou que n?o ocorreu diferen?a significativa (p?0,05) para os desafios em todos os dias experimentais. J? a an?lise entre o tratado I e III, determinou que n?o houve diferen?a significativa (p?0,05) at? o dia +49, havendo diferen?a significativa (p?0,05) no dia +56. O estudo foi encerrado no dia +56 j? que a efic?cia do fipronil nos grupos tratados I, II e III n?o apresentou mais efeito residual de prote??o quando os animais foram reinfestados. A desidrata??o epid?rmica induzida n?o determinou altera??o na efic?cia ou diminui??o do efeito residual do fipronil quando empregados em c?es submetidos ? exposi??o de popula??es de C. felis felis,, atrav?s de infesta??es semanais. Fato esse corroborado uma vez que, as aplica??es de formula??o lip?dica, n?o foram capazes, por sua vez, de determinar maior efic?cia ou prolongamento do efeito residual do fipronil quando empregados em c?es submetidos ? exposi??o de popula??es de C. felis felis., atrav?s de infesta??es semanais

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:localhost:jspui/2142
Date26 February 2015
CreatorsNunes, Tiago Abrah?o Pereira
ContributorsScott, Fabio Barbour, Souza, Clarissa Pimentel de, Martins, Isabela Vilhena Freira, Fernandes, J?lio Israel, Azevedo, Tha?s Ribeiro Correia
PublisherUniversidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Ci?ncias Veterin?rias, UFRRJ, Brasil, Instituto de Veterin?ria
Source SetsIBICT Brazilian ETDs
LanguagePortuguese
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
Formatapplication/pdf
Sourcereponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ, instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, instacron:UFRRJ
Rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
RelationARIKAWA, J.; ISHIBASHI, M.; KAWASHIMA, M.; TAKAGI, Y.; ICHIKAWA, Y.; IMOKAWA, G. Decreased levels of sphingosine, a natural antimicrobial agente, may be associated with vulnerability of the stratum corneum from patients with atopic dermatites to colonization by Staphylococcus aureus. The Journal of Investigative Dermatology, v. 119, n. 2, p. 433-439, 2002. BATISTA, O. S. C. L.; VIEIRA, C. P. V.; CORREIA, R. T.; SANTOS, F. C. E.; FAZIO JR, I. P.; FLORENCIO. N. C.; CARNEIRO, B. M.; SCOTT, B. F.; COUMENDOUROS, K. Efic?cia in vitro de uma formula??o aerossol de piriproxifen e ciflutrina no controle de Ctenocephalides felis felis (Bouch?, 1835) (Siphonaptera: Pulicidae). Revista Brasileira de Medicina Veterin?ria, v. 34, n. 1, p. 41 - 45, 2012. BARNETT, S.; LUEMPERT, L.; SCHUELE, G.; QUEZADA, A.; STREHLAU, G.; DOHERTY, P. Efficacy of Pyriprole Topical Solution against the Cat Flea, Ctenocephalides felis, on Dogs. Veterinary Therapeutics, v. 9, n. 1, p. 04-14, 2008. BENSIGNOR, E.; MORGANT, D, M.; NUTTAL, T. Efficay of an essencial fatty acid-enriched diet in managing canine atopic dermatitis: a randomize, single-blinded croos-over study. Veterinary Dermatology, v. 19, n. 3, p. 156-162, 2008. BITAM, I.; DITTMAR, K.; PAROLA, P.; WHITING, M. F.; RAOULT, D. Fleas and flea-borne diseases. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, v. 14, n. 8, p. 667?676, 2010. BLAGBURN, B. L.; DRYDEN, M. W. Biology, treatment and control of flea and tick infestations. The Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, v. 39, n. 6, p. 1173-1200, 2009. BITTENCOURT, V. R. E. P.; MASCARENHAS, A. G.; FACCINI, L. H. Mecanismo de infec??o do fungo Metarhizium anisopliae no carrapato Boophilus microplus em condi??es experimentais. Cienc. Rural, v. 29, n. 02, p. 351-354, 1999. BONNEAU, S.; FOURIER, J. J.; ROUSSEAU, C.; CADIERGUES, M. C. Comparative efficacy of two fipronil spot-on formulations against experimental flea infestations (Ctenocephalides felis) in dogs. The International Journal of Applied Research in Veterinary Medicine, v. 8, n. 1, p. 16 - 20, 2010. BRESCIANI, K. D. S.; SANTOS, T. R.; MARTINELI, T. M.; VERONES, V. A.; PERRI, S. H. V. Efic?cia do fipronil e do imidacloprid ?top spot? contra pulgas (Ctenocephalides) em c?es naturalmente infestados. Ars Veterin?ria, v. 20, n. 1. p. 100-106, 2004. CARLOTTI, D.N.; JACOBS, D.E. Therapy, control and prevention of flea allergy dermatitis in dogs and cats. Veterinary Dermatology, v.11, n. 2, p.83-98, 2000. CHAMLIN, S. L.; KAO, J.; FRIEDEN, I, J.; SHEU, M. Y.; FOWLER, A. J.; FLUHR, J. W.; WILLIAMS, M. L.; ELIAS, P. M. Ceramide-dominant barrier repair lipids alleviate chilhood atopic dermatites: changes in barrier function provide a sensitive indicator of disease activity. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, v. 47, n. 2, p. 198-208, 2002. 46 CHANDLER, G. T.; CARY, T. L.; VOLZ, D. C.; WALSE, V. S. S.; FERRY, J. L.; KLOSTERHAUS, S. L. Fipronil effects on estuarine copepod (Amphiascus Tenuiremis) development, fertility, and reproduction: a rapid life-cycle assay in 96-well microplate format. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, v. 23, n. 1, p. 117-124, 2004. COLE, L. M.; NICHOLSON, R. A.; CASIDA, J. E. Action of phenylpyrazole insecticides at the GABA-gated chloride channel. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, v. 46, n. 1, p. 47?54, 1993. COOP, R. L.; TAYLOR, M. A.; JACOBS, D. E; JACKSON, F. Ectoparasites: recent advances in control. Trens in Parasitology, v. 18, n. 2, p. 55-56, 2002. CORREIA, T. R. Atividade do neonicotin?ide dinotefuran sobre Ctenocephalides. felis felis (Bouch?, 1806) (Siphonaptera: Pulicidade). 2007. 66 p. Tese (Doutorado). Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Serop?dica-RJ. 2007. CORREIA, T. R.; MELO, R. M. P. S.; FERNANDES, J. I.; FREITAS, I. F.; VIEIRA, V. P. C.; RIBEIRO, F. A. R.; VEROCAI, G. G.; SCOTT, F. B. Efic?cia de uma formula??o para aplica??o ambiental contendo o piretr?ide ciflutrina e o regulador de crescimento de insetos piriproxifen no controle de Ctenocephalides felis felis (Bouch?, 1835) (Siphonaptera: Pulicidae). Revista Brasileira de Medicina Veterin?ria, v. 32 (Supl. 1), p. 17-20, 2010. COUTINHO, C. F. B.; GALLI, A.; GARBELLINI, G. S.; TAKAAMA, M.; TANIMOTO, S. T.; AMARAL, R. B.; MAZO, L. H.; AVACA, L. A.; MACHADO, S. A. S. Pesticidas: Mecanismo de a??o, degrada??o e toxidez. Pesticidas (UFPR), v. 15, n. 1, p. 65-72, 2005. COX, C. Insecticide Factsheet - Fipronil. Journal of Pesticide Reform, v. 25, n 1, p. 10-15, 2005. CRUTHERS, L., SLONE, R.L., GUERRERO, J., ROBERTSON-PLOUGH, C. Evaluation of the speed of kill of fleas and ticks with Frontline Top Spot in dogs. Veterinary Therapeutics, v. 2, n. 2, p. 170-174, 2001. CUNNINGHAM, J. R.; RYAN, W. G. Compara??o entre Fipronil (Top Spot) e Imidacloriprid (Spot On) no controle de infesta??es por pulgas quando aplicados logo ap?s banho com xampu. A HoraVeterin?ria, v. 19, n. 109, p. 15-18, 1999. DEFRA. Evaluation on: fipronil use as a public hygiene insecticide. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, 1999. 116p. DRYDEN, M. W; NEAL, J. J.; BENNETT, G. W. Concepts of Flea Control. Companion Animal Practice. v. 19, n. 4-5, p. 11-20, 1989. DRYDEN, M. W.; RUST, M. K. The cat flea: biology, ecology and control. Veterinary Parasitology, v. 52, n. 1, p. 1-19, 1994. 47 DRYDEN, M. W.; DENENBERG, T. M.; BUNCH, S. Control of fleas on naturally infested dogs and cats and in private residences with topical spot applications of fipronil or imidacloprid. Veterinary Parasitology, v. 93, n. 1, p. 69-75, 2000. DRYDEN, M. W.; BROCE, A. B. El Control Integral de las Pulgas en el Siglo 21. Suplemento del Compendio Sobre Educaci?n Continua para el Veterinario em Pr?ctica, v. 24, n. 1, p. 1-7, 2003. DRYDEN, M. W.; PAYNE, P. SMITH, V. Efficacy of Selamectin and Fipronil-(S)-Methoprene Spot-On Formulations Applied to Cats against Adult Cat Fleas (Ctenocephalides felis), Flea Eggs, and Adult Flea Emergence. Veterinary Therapeutics, v. 8, n. 4, p. 255-262, 2007. DOBLER, G.; PFEFFER, M. Fleas as parasites of the family Canidae. Parasites & Vectors, v. 4, n. 139, p. 1-12, 2011. FARES, H. M.; CHATTERJEE, S.; HAYWARD, M. In vitro permeation and irritation of benzoyl peroxide-containing products. Internacional Journal of Pharmaceutics, v. 133 n. 1, p. 215-222(8), 1996. FOURIE, L. J.; KOK, D. J.; PETER, R. J. Control of immature stages of the flea Ctenocephalides felis (Bouch?) in carpets exposed to cats treated with imidacloprid. Journal of South African Veterinary Association, v. 71, n. 4, p. 219-221, 2000. FUJIMURA, M.; NAKATSUJI, Y.; FUJIWARA, S.; REME, C.; GATTO, H. Spot-on skin lipid complex as an adjunct therapy in dogs with atopic dermatitis: an open pilot study. Veterinary Medicine Internacional, v. 2011, n. 1, p. 1-5, 2011. HAINZL, D.; CASIDA, J. E. Fipronil insecticide: Novel photochemical desulfinylation with retention of neurotoxicity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, v. 93, n. 23, p. 12764-12767, 1996. HEATH, A.W.; ARFSTEN, A.; YAMANAKA, M.; DRYDEN, M.W.; DALE, B. Vaccination against the cat flea Ctenocephalides felis felis. Parasite Immunology, v. 16, n. 4, p. 187-191, 1994. HOGSETTE, J. A. Management of ectoparasites with biological control. International Journal for Parasitology, v. 29, n. 1, p. 147-151, 1999. HOSKING, B.; SMITH, B. K.; SCHUELE, G.; STREHLAU, G.; JUNQUERA, P. Efficacy of a 12.5% pyriprole spot-on solution against natural flea (Ctenocephalides felis) infestations on dogs. The International Journal of Applied Research in Veterinary Medicine, v. 7, n. 1, p. 32-35, 2009. HOVDA, L. R.; HOOSER, S. B. Toxicology of newer pesticides for use in dogs and cats. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, v. 32, n. 2, p. 455-467, 2002. 48 KWOCHKA, K. W.; KOWALSKI, J. J. Prophylactic efficacy of four antibacterial shampoos against Staphylococcus intermedius in dogs. American Journal of Veterinary Research, v. 52, n.1, p. 115-118, 1991. LINARDI, P. M.; GUIMAR?ES, L. R. Sifon?pteros do Brasil. S?o Paulo: Editora MZUSP/FAPESP, 1? edi??o, S?o Paulo, 2000. 291p. LINARDI, P. Checklist de Siphonaptera (Insecta) do Estado de S?o Paulo. Biota Neotropica, v. 11, n. 1, p. 607-617, 2011. LINARDI, P. M.; SANTOS, J. L. C. Ctenocephalides felis felis vs. Ctenocephalides canis (Siphonaptera: Pulicidae): some issues in correctly identify these species. Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterin?ria, v. 21, n. 4, p. 345-354, 2012. MARCHIONDO, A. A.; HOLDSWORTH, P. A.; FOURIE, L. J.; RUGG, D.; HELLMANN, K.; SNYDER, D. E.; DRYDEN, M, W. World Association for the Advancement of Veterinary Parasitology (W.A.A.V.P.) second edition: Guidelines for evaluating the efficacy of parasiticides for the treatment, prevention and control of flea and tick infestations on dogs and cats. Veterinary Parasitology, v. 194, n. 1, p. 84-97, 2013. MELO, I. S.; AZEVEDO, J. L. Controle Biol?gico. Jaguari?na, SP: EMBRAPA, v. 1, n. 262, p. 56-78, 1998 MELO, R. M. P. S.; VIEIRA, V. P. C.; TAVARES, P. V.; BATISTA, L. C. S. O.; CARNEIRO, M. B.; CORREIA, T. R.; CID, Y. P.; COUMENDOUROS, K.; SCOTT, F. B. Efic?cia do fipronil oral no controle de Ctenocephalides felis felis (Siphonaptera : Pulicidae) e Rhipicephalus sanguineus (Acari : Ixodidae) em c?es. Revista Brasileira de Medicina Veterin?ria, v. 34, p. 15-20, 2012. MILLER, H. W.; GRIFFIN, E. C.; CAMPBELL, L. K. Muller & Kirk?s Small Animal Dermatology. 7? ed. Elsevier. St. Louis, Missouri. 2013. 938 p. MUELLER, R. S.; BERGVALL, K.; BENSIGNOR, E.; BOND, R. A review of topical therapy for skin infections with bacteria and yeast. Veterinary Dermatology, v. 23, n. 4, p. 330-342, 2012. NARAHASHI, T.; ZHAO, X.; IKEDA, T.; SALGADO, V. L.; YEH, J. Z. Glutamate-activated chloride channels: unique fipronil targets present in insects but not in mammals. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology, v. 97, n. 2, p. 149-152, 2010. PAYNE, P. A.; DRYDEN, W. W.; SMITH, V.; RIDLEY, R. K. Effect of 0.29% w/w fipronil spray on adult flea mortality and egg production of three different cat flea, Ctenocephalides felis (Bouch?), strains infesting cats. Veterinary Parasitology, v. 102, n. 4, p. 331-340, 2001. PIEKUTOWSKA, A.; PIN, D.; REME, C. A.; GATTO, H.; HAFTEK, M. Effects of a topically applied preparation of epidermal lipids on the stratum corneum barrier of atopic dogs. Journal of Comparative Pathology. v. 138, n. 4, p. 197-203, 2008. 49 POPA, I.; PIN, D.; REMOUE, N.; OSTA, B.; CALLEJON, S.; VIDEMOUNT, E.; GATTO, H.; PORTOUKALIAN, J.; HAFTEK, M. Analysis of epidermal lipids in normal and atopic dogs, before and after administration of an oral omega-6/omega-3 fatty acid feed supplement. A pilot study. Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, v. 47, n. 2, p.198-208, 2011. POPP, K. F.; TANGHETTI, E. A. A current review of topical benzoyl peroxide: new perspectives on formulation and utilization. Dermatology Clinical, v. 27, n. 1, p. 17-24, 2009. POSTAL, J. M.; JEANNIN, P. C.; CONSAVI, P. J. Field efficacy of a mechanical pump spray formulation containing 0,25% fipronil in the treatment and control of flea infestation and associated dermalogical signs in dogs and cats. Veterinary Dermatology, v. 6, n. 3, p. 153-158, 1995. REITER, L. V.; TORRES, S. M. F.; WERTZ, P. W. Characterization and quantification of ceramides in the nonlesional skin of canine patients with atopic dermatitis compared with controls. Veterinary Dermatology, v. 20, n. 4, p. 260-266, 2009. RIBEIRO, F. A.; CORREIA, T. R.; FERNANDES, J. I.; MELO, R. M. P. S.; VIEIRA, V. P. C.; BEZERRA, L. L.; SCOTT, F. B. Atividade do extrato de nim sobre o desenvolvimento embrion?rio de Ctenocephalides felis felis (Bouch?, 1835) (Siphonaptera: Pulicidade). Revista Brasileira de Parasitologia Veterin?ria, v. 17, n. 1, p. 87-91, 2008. RUST, M. K.; DRYDEN, M. W. The Biology, Ecology, and Management of the Cat Flea. Annual Review of Entomology, v. 42, n. 1, p. 451-473, 1997. RUST, M. K. Advances in the control of Ctenocephalides felis felis (cat flea) on cats and dogs. Trends in Parasitology, v. 21, n. 5, p. 232-236, 2005. SCHUELE, G.; BARNETT, S.; BAPST, B.; CAVALIERO, T.; LUEMPERT, L.; STREHLAU, G.; YOUNG, D. R.; MORAN, C.; JUNQUERA, P. The effect of water and shampooing on the efficacy of a pyriprole 12.5% topical solution against brown dog tick (Rhipicephalus sanguineus) and cat flea (Ctenocephalides felis) infestations on dogs. Veterinary Parasitology, v. 151, n. 2-4, p. 300-311, 2008. SCHULZE, M. A.; STAHL, J.; BRODESSER, S.; ROHN, K.; NAIM, H.; TRAUTWEIN-HEWICKER, M.; KIETZMANN, M.; BAUMER, W.; MISCHKE, R. Comparison of three diferente sampling methods for canine skin lipids. Veterinary Dermatology, n. 24, n. 2, p. 233-243, 2013. SCOTT, D. W. Clinical assessment of topical benzoyl peroxide in treatment of canine skin diseases. Veterinary Medicine & Small Animal Clinician, v. 74, n. 1, p. 808-811, 1979. SCOTT, D. W.; MILLER, W. H.; CAYATTE, S. M. A clinical study on the effect of two commercial veterinary benzoyl peroxide shampoos in dogs. Canine Practice, v. 19, n. 2, p. 7-10, 1994. 50 SCOTT, F. B.; MARTINS, I. V. F.; SOUZA, C. P.; CORREIA, T. R. Aspectos gerais do controle da pulga Ctenocephalides felis felis em c?es. A HoraVeterin?ria, v. 21, n. 125, p. 13-18, 2002. SHANKS, D. J.; ROWAN, T. G.; JONES, R. L.; WATSON, P.; MURPHY, M. G.; SMITH, D. G.; JERNIGAN, A. D. Efficacy of selamectin in the treatment and prevention of flea (Ctenocephalides felis felis) infestations on dogs and cats housed in simulated home environments. Veterinary Parasitology, v. 91, n. 3-4, p. 213?222, 2000. SHIMADA, K.; YOON, J. S.; YOSHIHARA, T.; IWASAKI, T.; NISHIFUJI, K. Increased transepidermal water loss and decreased ceramide content in lesional and non-lesional skin of dogs with atopic dermatitis. Veterinary Dermatology, v. 20, n. 5-6. p. 541-546, 2009. TANCREDI, M. G. F. Efic?cia e seguran?a cl?nica comparativa de duas formula??es de aplica??o t?pica contendo 10 % de fipronil no controle de ectoparasitos em c?es e gatos. 2009. 65 f. (Doutorado). Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Serop?dica, RJ, 2009. TAYLOR, M. A. Recent developments in ectoparasiticides.The Veterinary Journal, v. 161, n. 3, p. 253-268. 2001. TAYLOR, M. A.; COOP, R. L.; WALL, R. L. Veterinary Parasitology. 3? ed. Iowa: Blackwell Publishing. 2007, 874p. VALADARES-INGLIS, M. C. C.; SHILER, W.; SOUZA, M. T. Engenharia gen?tica de microrganismos agentes de controle biol?gico. In: MELO, I. S.; AZEVEDO, J. L. Controle Biol?gico. Jaguari?na: Embrapa-CNPMA, 1998. v. 1, p. 201-230. VIEGAS-J?NIOR, C. Terpenos com atividade inseticida: uma alternativa para o controle qu?mico de insetos. Qu?mica Nova, v. 26, n. 3, p. 390-400, 2003. WALLER, J. M.; DREHER, F.; BEHNAM, S.; FORD, S.; LEE, C.; TIET, T.; WEINSTEIN, G. D.; MAIBACH, H. L. ?Keratolytic properties of benzoyl peroxide and retinoic acid resemble salicylic acid in man. Skin Pharmacol Physiol, v. 19, n. 5, p. 283-289, 2006. YAO, K. P.; FRANC, M. Comparison of the activity of selamectin, imidacloprid and fipronil for the treatment of cats infested experimentally with Ctenocephalides felis felis and Ctenocephalides felis strongylus. Veterinary Parasitology, v. 125, n. 3-4, p. 397-407, 2006. YOUNG, D. R.; JEANNIN, P. C.; BOECKH, A. Efficacy of fipronil/(s)-methoprene combination spot-on for dogs against shed eggs, emerging and existing adult cat fleas (Ctenocephalides felis, Bouch?). Veterinary Parasitology, v. 125, n. 3-4, p. 397-407, 2004.

Page generated in 0.0039 seconds