Submitted by Leticia Schettini (leticia@ufrrj.br) on 2017-03-17T13:12:34Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
2001 - Marilene Alvares.pdf: 614893 bytes, checksum: ca3d3b41579b663ff4afa2939a0a892f (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-03-17T13:12:34Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
2001 - Marilene Alvares.pdf: 614893 bytes, checksum: ca3d3b41579b663ff4afa2939a0a892f (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2001-08-15 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior - CAPES / The habromatids biology and their patogenies have abready been well studied. But not na efficient technique has been developed, or peridically tested for the diagnosis of the gastric habronemiasis in equidae. Has been proposed the compation of two techniques: the UENO (1986) technique and UENO & GUTIERRES (1983), modified and the xenodiagnostic technique. On the Ueno (modified) technique to recuperate first stage larvae, has been used fecal examples of 3g and 5g, with 3 repetitions for each. From each example has been taken 0,3 ml of the sediment, divided in three microscope slides and then the slides were observed though the light microscope for counting the larvae number of Habronema spp. or Drashia megastoma. To the xenodiagnostic, larvae of Musca domestica and Stomoxys calcitrans (Muscidae: Diptera) were inoculated in the equidae feces and then were kept in the laboratory.
The adults muscoids0 were dissected and the third stage larvae of the nematodes were saved and counted. The adults nematodes were colected from the stomach of 35 equidae then fixed in AFA and preserved in alcohol 70% for later identification. The comparative analysis were based on the linear correlation. The comparation of the determination rates indicated that there weren?t significative difference on the recuperation of larvae on the Ueno (modified) technique, with the two different examples weights and the xenodiagnostic technique. The Ueno (modified) technique utilizing 3g and 5g of feces had the same index of determination, 73%. The test t analysis showed no significant difference between the three slides on the Ueno technique observation. While the xenodiagnostic technique got a determination rate of 79,1%, when utilizing only M. domestica and the two especies of females of Habronema spp. And the determination index of 81,3% when utilizing M. domestica and females of Habronema muscae based on the linear correlation. / A biologia das Habronemat?neos e suas patogenias j? foi bem estudada. No entanto, nenhuma t?cnica coprosc?pica eficiente foi desenvolvida e rotineiramente testada para o diagn?stico da habronemose g?strica em eq??deos. Foi proposta a compara??o de duas t?cnicas: a t?cnica de UENO (1968) e UENO & GUTIERRES (1983) modificada e a t?cnica do xenodiagn?stico. Na t?cnica de Ueno (modificada) para recupera??o da larva de primeiro est?gio, foi utilizado amostras contendo 3g e 5g de fezes, com tr?s reparti??es para cada amostra de fezes. De cada amostra foi retirado 0,3 ml de sedimento, dividindo em tr?s l?minas sendo levado ao microsc?pio ?tico para contagem do n?mero de larvas de Habronema spp. ou Drashia megastoma. Para o xenodiagn?stico, larvas de Musca domestica e Stomoxys calcitrans (Muscidae: Diptera) foram inoculadas nas fezes dos eq??deos e mantidos em laborat?rio. Os musc?deos adultos foram dissecados e as formas de terceiro est?gio dos nemat?ides recuperados e contados. Os nemat?ides adultos foram coletados do est?mago de 35 eq??deos, fixados em AFA e conservados em ?lcool a 70%, para posterior identifica??o. A an?lise comparativa foi baseada na regress?o linear. A compara??o dos ?ndices de determina??o indicaram n?o haver diferen?a significativa na recupera??o de larvas na t?cnica de Ueno (modificada), com os dois diferentes pesos de amostras de fezes e a t?cnica do xenodiagn?stico. A t?cnica de Ueno (modificada) utilizando 3g e 5g de fezes obteve o mesmo ?ndice de determina??o 73%. A an?lise do teste t demonstrou n?o existir diferen?a significativa entre as tr?s l?minas na leitura da t?cnica de sedimenta??o. Enquanto a t?cnica do xenodiagn?stico obteve o ?ndice de determina??o de 79,1% quando utilizado apenas M. domestica para realiza??o desta, e as duas esp?cies de f?meas de Habronema spp. e o ?ndice de determina??o de 81,3% quando utilizado M. domestica e f?meas de Habronema muscae como base da regress?o linear.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:localhost:jspui/1464 |
| Date | 15 August 2001 |
| Creators | ?lvares, Marilene |
| Contributors | Scott, F?bio Barbour, Rodrigues, Maria de Lurdes de A., Alejos, Jos? Luis Fernando Luque |
| Publisher | Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Medicina Veterin?ria (Patologia e Ci?ncias Cl?nicas), UFRRJ, Brasil, Instituto de Veterin?ria |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UFRRJ, instname:Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, instacron:UFRRJ |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | ALCAINO, H., T. GORMAN, S. CORNEJO, R. MOLINARI & A. PINTO. 1980. Estudio epizootiol?gico de parasitismo estomacal Del eq?ino de la zona Centro Sur de Chile. Archivos de Medicina Veterinaria. 12:10-29. ALFARO, A.A. 1982. Tratamiento intra-lesional de habronemasis cut?nea con el organofosforado thriclorfon en caballos. Ci?ncia Veterin?ria. 4:25-28. AMADO, S. 1997. O desenvolvimento biol?gico de Habronema muscae Carter, 1861 (Diesing, 1861) (Nematoda: Habronematidae) em Musca domestica Linnaeus, 1758 (D?ptera: Muscidae). Tese de mestrado, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Serop?dica. 65p. ANDERSON, R.C., A.G. CHABAUD & S. WILLMOTT. 1974. Key to the parasites of vertebrates ? General introduction. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham Royal, Slough SL. 2 3 BH, England. BAUER, C. 1986. Befall mit Magarparasiten bei Pferdai in Nord-dentschland. Deutsche Tierarztliche Wocheuxrhrift. 93:386, 388-389. BOULEY, H. 1850. D?une vai?te particuli?re d?inflammation de la peau et des muqueuses apparentes, cause? par le d?voloppement de granulations fibrino-calcaires dans les intertices du tissue inflamm?. Recueil de M?decine Vet?rinaire Pratique. 27:945-966. BUCKNELL, D.G., R.B. GASSER and I. BEVERIDGE. 1995. Prevalence and epidemiology of gastrointestinal parasites of horses I Victoria, Australia. International Jounal for Parasitology. 25(6):711-24. BULL, L.B. 1919. A contribuition to the study of habronemosis; a clinical, pathological and experimental investigation of a granul-condition of the horse. Transactions Royal Society of South Australia. 43:85-141. CARNEIRO, J.R., E. PEREIRA, W. MARTINS JUNIOR & M.G FREITAS. 1980. Listas de animais dom?sticos do Estado de Goi?s. Revista Patol?gica Tropical, Goi?nia. 9(1/2):61-71. COSTA, H.M.A., A.C.R. LEITE, M.P. GUIMAR?ES & W.S. LIMA. 1986. Distribui??o de helmintos parasitos de animais dom?sticos no Brasil. Arquivos Brasileiros de Medicina Veterin?ria e Zootecnia. 38:465-579. CYRAK, V.Y.; HERMOSILLA, C. e BAUER, C. 1996. Study on the gastrointestinal parasite 43 fauna of ponies in northern Germany. Applied Parasitology v.37, p39-244. DESCAZEAUX, J. & J. MOREL. 1933. Diagnostic biologique (xenodiagnostic) des Habronemoses gastriques Du cheval. Bulletin de la Societ? de Pathologie Exotique. 26:1010-1014. DIAZ-UNGRIA. 1979. Algunas esp?cies de helmintos nuevas para Venezuela. Revista Ib?rica de Parasitologia. 39:313-336. DRUDGE, J.G. 1956. Helminth infections in horses. Veterinary Medicine. 51(8):349-357. DUARTE, M.J.F. 1981. Helmintos parasitos dos animais dom?sticos no Estado do Rio de Janeiro. Arquivos da Escola de Veterin?ria, Belo Horizonte. 33(1):67-98. FERNANDES, J.C. 1976. Aula inaugural da Escola Superior de Veterin?ria de Pernambuco, Recife. In FERNANDES, J.C & T.E. TRAVASSOS. Lista dos helmintos parasitos dos animais dom?sticos de Pernambuco. Anais da Universidade Federal Rural Pernambuco ? Ci?ncias Biol?gicas, Recife. 3(1): 221-32. FOSTER, A.O. 1936. A quantitative study of the nematodes from a selected group of equines in Panama. Journal of Parasitology. 22:479-510. FREITAS, M.G. 1957. Lista de helmintos parasitos dos animais dom?sticos de Minas Gerais. Arquivos da Escola Superior de Veterin?ria, Belo Horizonte. 10:373-381. GAWOR, J.J. 1995. The prevalence and abundance of internal parasites in working horses autopsied in Poland. Veterinary Parasitology. 58(1-2):99-108. GEORGI, J.R. 1980. Parasitology for Veterinarians. 3 rd ed. Sauders, Philadelphia. 386pg. GIOVANNONI, M. & G.V.L. KUBIAK. 1947. Fauna parasitol?gica paranaense. IV- Lista previa da ocorr?ncia de helmintos em animais dom?sticos. Arquivos da Biologia e Tecnologia, Curitiba. 2:225-32. HILL, G.F. 1918. Relationship of insects to parasitic diseases in stock. Parte 1: the life history of Habronema muscae, H. microstoma and H. megastoma. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria. 31 (N. series):11-76. IVASHKIN, V.M., L.A. KHROMOVA, G.M. DROINOS, M.D. SONIN. 1984. Biological characteristics of Habronema parasitic in equines. Gel ?minty sel? skokhozyaistvennyh I okhotnich? e promyslovykh zhivotnyh. 10-17, 11 ref. JESUS, Z. 1963. Observations on habronemosis in horse. Phillipine. Journal of Veterinary Medicine. 2:133-152. JOHNSTON, T.H. & M.J. BANCROFT. 1920. The life-history of Habronema in the relation to M. domestica and native flies in Queeslend. Proceding of Royal Society of Queesland, Brisbane. 32:61-68. LICHTENFELS, J.R. 1975. Helminths of domestic Equids. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington 42 (special issue) 92 pg. LYONS E.T., S.C. TOLLIVER, J.H. DRUDGE, T.W. SWERCZEK, and M.W. CROWE. 1983. Parasites in Kentucky thorough breds at necropsy: emphasis on stomach worms and tapewormsn. American Journal of Veterinary Research. 44(5):839-44. MARBACH, W. 1963. Common internal parasites of horses their recognition and treatment. Agricultural Gazette of New South Walles. 74(9):514-521. MARBACH, W. 1975. Common internal parasites of horses. Animal Daseases Bulletin. 15:1-7. MARTINS, V.A. & M.G. FREITAS. 1949. Estudos sobre a habronemose eq?ina. Ceres (Minas Gerais). 8(45):181-187. MELLO, M.J. & R. CUOCOLO. 1943a. T?cnica para diagn?stico da habronemose g?strica dos eq??deos. Arquivos do Instituto Biol?gico de S?o Paulo. 14:217-226. MELLO, M.J. & R. CUOCOLO. 1943b. Alguns aspectos das rela??es de Habronema muscae (Carter, 1861) com a mosca dom?stica. Arquivos do Instituto Biol?gico de S?o Paulo. 14:227-234. MFITILODZE, M.W. & G.W. HUTCHINSON G.W. 1989. Prevalence and intensity of non-strongyle intestinal parasites of horses in norterthern Queensland. Australian Veterinary Journal. 66(1):23-6. PAIVA, F. 1988. Habronema muscae (Carter, 1861) Diesing, 1861: Descri??o de formas imaturas, uma nova t?cnica de diagn?stico e a preval?ncia da habronemose g?strica no estado do Mato Grosso do Sul. Tese de Mestrado, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Serop?dica. 58p. PALLAREZ, R., C.B. USHER & G. VERGARA. 1971. Descricion de parasitos de Equus caballus en el Paraguay. I. Nematoda: 1? parte: esp?cies de l?s subfam?lias Cyathostominae, Spirurinae y Strongylinae. Revista Paraguaya de Microbiologia. 6(1):63-77. PEREIRA, V.S., M.J. MELLO. 1948. Papel da predisposi??o do hospedeiro na produ??o da habronemose cut?nea (?ESPONJA?) dos eq??deos. Arquivos do Instituto Biol?gico de S?o Paulo. 18:363-379. PINTO, C. & J.L. ALMEIDA. 1945. apud PINTO, C. Zooparasitos de interesse m?dico e veterin?rio. Rio de Janeiro, Cientifica. 461p. PIRES, A. 1938. Estudios experimental sobre a ?Ilaga de verano?. Rev. de Med. Vet., Buenos Aires. 20:397-422. RANSOM, B.H. 1911. The life history of a parasitic nematode Habronema muscae. Reprint Science. 34:690-692. RANSOM, B.H. 1913. The life-history of Habronema muscae, Carter ? A parasite of the Horse tranmitted by the housefly. bulletin No163 of the Bureau of Animal Industry, United States Department of Agriculture, p.1-36. REBHUN, W.C., E.J. MIRRO, M.E. GEORGI, & T.J. KERN. 1981. Habronemic blepharoconjuntivitis in horses. Journal of American Veterinary Medicine Association. 179(5):469-472. REDDY, A.B., N.S.N. GAUR &, U.K. SHARMA. 1976. Pathological changes due to Habronema muscae and H. megastoma (Drashia megastoma) infection in equines. Indian Journal Animal Science. 46:207-210. REINEMEYER, C.R, S.A SMITH, A.A. GABEL & R.P. MERD. 1984. The prevalence and intensity of internal parasites of horse in the USA. Veterinary Parasitology. 15:75-83. RICCI. M. & A. SABATINI A. 1992. Parasitic helminths of the cecum and colon of equidae in Italy. Parasitologia. 34(1-3):53-60. ROUBAUD, E. & J. DESCAZEAUX. 1921. Contribuition I?histoire de la mouche domestique comme agent vecteur des Habronemoses de equides. Bulletin de la Socociet? de Pathologie Exotique. 4:471-506. ROUBAUD, E. & J. DESCAZEAUX. 1922a. Evolution de l?Habronema muscae chez la mouche domestique et de l?H. miscrostoma chez le stomoxe. Bulletin de la Socociet? de Pathologie Exotique. 15(7):572-574. ROUBAUD, E. & J. DESCAZEAUX. 1922b. Deuxieme ? l?historire de la mouche domestique comme agent vecteur des habronemoses d?equides. Bulletin de la Socociet? de Pathologie Exotique. 15(7):978-1001. SALLES, J.F. De & J. JANSEN. 1945. Xenodiagn?stico na Habronemose dos eq??deos: estudo das larvas dos helmintos. Mem?rias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 42(1):207-215. SILKIN, J. 1956. Internal parasites of the horse. Jounal of Agricultural of Western, Australia. 3? series. 5(4) . TOLLIVER, S.C., E.T. LYONS, J.H. DRUDGE. 1987. Prevalence of internal parasites in horses in critical tests of activity Lof parasiticides over a year period (1956-1983) inKentucky. Veterinary Parasitology. 23(3-4):273-84. UENO, H. 1968. A simple method for detection of first stage larvae of Dictyocaulus viviparus in faeces of cattle. II. Comparison with other methods and field application. Journal of the Japan Veterinary and Medical Association. 21:255. UENO, H. & V.C. GUTIERRES. 1983. Manual para diagn?stico das helmintoses de ruminantes. Japan International Cooperation Agency, T?quio, Jap?o. 176pg. WADDEL, A.H. 1969. A survey of Habronema megastoma and H. muscae and the identification stage larvae of Habronema megastoma and H. muscae. Australian Veterinary Journal. 45:20-21. |
Page generated in 0.011 seconds