Submitted by Sara Ribeiro (sara.ribeiro@ucb.br) on 2018-01-19T13:35:26Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
BrunodeMacedoCavalcantiBorgesPimentelDissertacao2017.pdf: 2375544 bytes, checksum: f22e5a97454c348f3a9ba4a7c06ac8d0 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Sara Ribeiro (sara.ribeiro@ucb.br) on 2018-01-19T13:35:39Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
BrunodeMacedoCavalcantiBorgesPimentelDissertacao2017.pdf: 2375544 bytes, checksum: f22e5a97454c348f3a9ba4a7c06ac8d0 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-01-19T13:35:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
BrunodeMacedoCavalcantiBorgesPimentelDissertacao2017.pdf: 2375544 bytes, checksum: f22e5a97454c348f3a9ba4a7c06ac8d0 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2017-08-25 / The evaluation of the stricto sensu graduation was consolidated as an instrument of
great importance for the National Graduate System (SNPG) and for the promotion of
scientific research and technological development in Brazil. This research addresses
the issue of the stricto sensu graduate course evaluation in Brazil according to the
interpretation of the managers involved in the evaluation process of the Coordination
of Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (Capes). The objective was to
investigate the interpretation of the coordinators of graduate programs in education
regarding the use of the Sucupira Platform for the programs evaluation during the
quadrennium 2013-2016. The research has a qualitative nature, although it is based
on the analysis of quantitative data. In relation to the theoretical basis, the research
was developed based on the Policy Cycle Approach, developed by Stephen Ball,
Richard Bowe and Anne Gold (BALL; BOWE; GOLD, 1992; BALL, 1994). This
method is an important theoretical analytical tool for the understanding, study,
evaluation and analysis of educational policies. Three techniques were used to
investigate the object under study: the semi-structured interview carried out in four
programs in the area of education in the Center-West region; The mixed format
questionnaire applied electronically to all coordinators of the one hundred and
seventy four education programs currently operating in the country; And
documentary analysis. The questionnaires were sent and the data processed through
the computer program "SurveyMonkey". The research data were analyzed based on
content analysis according to Laurence Bardin (2011). The data indicate that the
coordinators of the education programs identify the integration of the Platform with
the other instruments, but ask for improvement in this interaction. The coordinators
recognize the Platform as the main instrument for the evaluation of graduate studies
and its importance for the improvement of the SNPG. They interpret the filling in the
Platform data according to the realities and the peculiarities of its programs and seek
to adapt to the requirements of Capes for the evaluation. They report difficulties in
filling in the programs data in the Platform, since it is an eminently manual, detailed,
exhaustive activity that still has operational failures on the system. However, they
recognize the substantial improvement in the process of sending the Data Collection.
In general, the filling in the Platform data is done by the secretaries of the programs,
supervised by the coordinators. The questionnaire data and the interviewed
managers' talk about the Sucupira Platform's contributions and the objectives
reached demonstrate the success of the system. However, they criticize some
specific points of the Platform, such as the loss of registered data. They also criticize
the Capes evaluation system, especially in relation to the criteria used in the periodic
evaluations of the programs and the Qualis system classification of the teachers and
students intellectual production evaluation. The research suggests improvements in
the management of programs data in the Platform by the coordinators and the
improvement of the evaluation process of the graduate programs by Capes. / A avalia????o da p??s-gradua????o stricto sensu se consolidou como instrumento de
grande import??ncia para o Sistema Nacional de P??s-Gradua????o (SNPG) e para o
fomento da pesquisa cient??fica e desenvolvimento tecnol??gico no Brasil. Esta
pesquisa aborda a quest??o da avalia????o da p??s-gradua????o stricto sensu no Brasil
segundo a interpreta????o dos gestores envolvidos com o processo de avalia????o da
Coordena????o de Aperfei??oamento de Pessoal de N??vel Superior (Capes). O objetivo
foi investigar a interpreta????o dos coordenadores de programas de p??s-gradua????o
em educa????o acerca do uso da Plataforma Sucupira na avalia????o dos programas no
quadri??nio 2013-2016. A pesquisa possui uma natureza prioritariamente qualitativa,
embora se apoie na an??lise de dados quantitativos. Em rela????o ?? fundamenta????o
te??rica, o estudo foi desenvolvido com aproxima????o ao m??todo do Ciclo de Pol??ticas
(Policy Cicle Approach), concebido por Stephen Ball, Richard Bowe e Anne Gold
(BALL; BOWE; GOLD, 1992; BALL, 1994). Esse m??todo constitui-se em uma
ferramenta te??rica anal??tica importante para a compreens??o, estudo, avalia????o e
an??lise das pol??ticas educacionais. Foram utilizadas tr??s t??cnicas para investiga????o
do objeto em estudo: a entrevista semiestruturada realizada em quatro programas
da ??rea de educa????o da regi??o Centro-Oeste; o question??rio de formato misto
aplicado de forma eletr??nica para todos os coordenadores dos cento e setenta e
quatro programas da ??rea de educa????o em funcionamento no pa??s; e a an??lise
documental. Os question??rios foram enviados e os dados tratados atrav??s do
programa de computador ???SurveyMonkey???. Os dados da pesquisa foram analisados
com base na an??lise de conte??do de Laurence Bardin (2011). Os dados indicam que
os coordenadores dos programas da ??rea de educa????o reconhecem a integra????o da
Plataforma com os demais instrumentos de avalia????o da Capes, mas pedem a
melhoria nessa intera????o. Os coordenadores reconhecem a Plataforma como
principal instrumento de avalia????o da p??s-gradua????o e sua import??ncia para o
aperfei??oamento do SNPG. Interpretam o preenchimento da Plataforma de acordo
com as realidades e as particularidades dos seus programas e buscam se adequar
??s exig??ncias da Capes para a avalia????o. Relatam dificuldades em rela????o ao
preenchimento das informa????es dos programas na Plataforma, por ser uma
atividade eminentemente manual, detalhista, exaustiva e que ainda apresenta falhas
operacionais do sistema. Todavia reconhecem a melhoria substancial do processo
de envio do Coleta de dados. Em geral, o preenchimento da Plataforma ?? feito pelos
secret??rios dos programas, supervisionados pelos coordenadores. Os dados dos
question??rios e a fala dos gestores entrevistados sobre as contribui????es da
Plataforma Sucupira e os objetivos atingidos atestam o ??xito do sistema. Por??m,
criticam alguns pontos espec??ficos da Plataforma, como a perda de dados
cadastrados. Criticam tamb??m o sistema de avalia????o da Capes, especialmente em
rela????o aos crit??rios utilizados nas avalia????es peri??dicas dos programas e o sistema
Qualis de classifica????o da produ????o intelectual dos docentes e discentes. A
pesquisa sugere melhorias no gerenciamento das informa????es dos programas na
Plataforma pelos coordenadores e o aperfei??oamento do processo de avalia????o da
p??s-gradua????o pela Capes.
Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:bdtd.ucb.br:tede/2340 |
Date | 25 August 2017 |
Creators | Pimentel, Bruno de Mac??do Cavalcanti Borges |
Contributors | Guimar??es-Iosif, Ranilce Mascarenhas |
Publisher | Universidade Cat??lica de Bras??lia, Programa Strictu Sensu em Educa????o, UCB, Brasil, Escola de Educa????o, Tecnologia e Comunica????o |
Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
Language | Portuguese |
Detected Language | English |
Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
Format | application/pdf |
Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UCB, instname:Universidade Católica de Brasília, instacron:UCB |
Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0175 seconds