Return to search

On the Use of Simulation and Assessment in Surgical Training

The transition from medical school to residency is often considered the most difficult year for both teachers and learners. Learners report feeling underprepared, and some researchers have identified a decrease in patient safety during the first month of residency. These factors suggest learners could be better supported during this transition period. Previous research demonstrates that boot camps (BCs) at the onset of residency can improve learners’ confidence, knowledge, and some technical skills. However, little information has been published on how those BCs were developed and implemented, why BCs only improve some skills and not others, or the long-term impacts of BC programs.
We used a Context, Input, Process, and Product program evaluation framework to develop, implement, and evaluate a simulation-based BC for novice surgical trainees that was aligned with the recent shift towards competency-based models of medical education. Next, we used a Convergent Parallel Mixed Methods approach to explore the longer-term impacts of the BC program. Lastly, we explored how effectively the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE), a “gold standard” measure of learner competence that was used in the BC program, truly captures clinical performance of novice trainees.
This work demonstrates that incorporating a BC at the onset of residency can improve residents’ confidence and skill for up to two years into training, although adherence to sound pedagogical principles is critical. The BC also provided residents with the opportunity to participate in role clarification, acculturation, and social integration. Finally, we demonstrate that OSCEs may not always be the best way to measure BC effectiveness.
The data presented in this thesis will provide educators with new insights on how to create and evaluate successful BC programs to support learners through the transition to residency; highlight new approaches for evaluating educational initiatives; and prompt a conversation about how assessment is being used in medical education. / Dissertation / Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) / From day one, new doctors are expected to adapt to new training environments, manage increased workloads, and make decisions about patient care, while working longer hours, and with less support than they had as medical students. As such, research suggests that new doctors often feel underprepared and stressed when entering residency. Furthermore, the ‘July Effect’, which suggests that fatal medical errors rise by 10% in the first month of residency compared with all other months, suggests that something needs to change. In this thesis, we sought to improve the way that surgical training programs approach the transition into residency, and look at the long-term impacts of these changes. Through three interrelated studies, we provide educators with information on how to develop, implement, and evaluate a simulation-based boot camp for new doctors; highlight new approaches for evaluating educational initiatives; and revisit how assessment is being used in medical education.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:mcmaster.ca/oai:macsphere.mcmaster.ca:11375/24794
Date January 2019
CreatorsWagner, Natalie
ContributorsSonnadara, Ranil, Psychology
Source SetsMcMaster University
LanguageEnglish
Detected LanguageEnglish
TypeThesis

Page generated in 0.002 seconds