abstract: Human-agent teams (HATs) are expected to play a larger role in future command and control systems where resilience is critical for team effectiveness. The question of how HATs interact to be effective in both normal and unexpected situations is worthy of further examination. Exploratory behaviors are one that way adaptive systems discover opportunities to expand and refine their performance. In this study, team interaction exploration is examined in a HAT composed of a human navigator, human photographer, and a synthetic pilot while they perform a remotely-piloted aerial reconnaissance task. Failures in automation and the synthetic pilot’s autonomy were injected throughout ten missions as roadblocks. Teams were clustered by performance into high-, middle-, and low-performing groups. It was hypothesized that high-performing teams would exchange more text-messages containing unique content or sender-recipient combinations than middle- and low-performing teams, and that teams would exchange less unique messages over time. The results indicate that high-performing teams had more unique team interactions than middle-performing teams. Additionally, teams generally had more exploratory team interactions in the first session of missions than the second session. Implications and suggestions for future work are discussed. / Dissertation/Thesis / Masters Thesis Human Systems Engineering 2019
Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:asu.edu/item:54889 |
Date | January 2019 |
Contributors | Lematta, Glenn Joseph (Author), Chiou, Erin K. (Advisor), Cooke, Nancy J. (Committee member), Roscoe, Rod D. (Committee member), Arizona State University (Publisher) |
Source Sets | Arizona State University |
Language | English |
Detected Language | English |
Type | Masters Thesis |
Format | 59 pages |
Rights | http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ |
Page generated in 0.0018 seconds