Submitted by Automa??o e Estat?stica (sst@bczm.ufrn.br) on 2017-04-03T21:33:41Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
RobertoSolinoDeSouza_DISSERT.pdf: 463652 bytes, checksum: 4bfb3031965a398a25930a0fc1ccf9f5 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Arlan Eloi Leite Silva (eloihistoriador@yahoo.com.br) on 2017-04-10T19:24:31Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
RobertoSolinoDeSouza_DISSERT.pdf: 463652 bytes, checksum: 4bfb3031965a398a25930a0fc1ccf9f5 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-04-10T19:24:31Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
RobertoSolinoDeSouza_DISSERT.pdf: 463652 bytes, checksum: 4bfb3031965a398a25930a0fc1ccf9f5 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2016-12-12 / Este trabalho examina a possibilidade de que S?crates esteja atacando um homem
de palha no Teeteto, 152a, quando explica o dito de Prot?goras de que ?o homem ?
a medida de todas as coisas? como sendo express?o de um relativismo vulgar que
iguala o conhecimento ? mera percep??o. Parte da sugest?o de Leo Strauss de que
os grandes escritores do passado fizeram uso de uma t?cnica peculiar, que ele
denomina metaforicamente de ?escrita entre linhas?, visando defender suas ideias
heterodoxas da persegui??o pol?tica, enquanto expressam abertamente ideias
conformadas ?s opini?es amplamente aceitas na sociedade. Busca demonstrar que
a sugest?o de Strauss ? v?lida e que na maior parte da hist?ria da filosofia a escrita
entre linhas foi aceita amplamente e s? recentemente esquecida. Busca clarificar a
sugest?o de Strauss e extrair regras m?nimas que possam orientar uma leitura do
trecho citado do Teeteto. Considera ao final que uma leitura entre linhas do citado
trecho pode indicar que a hip?tese examinada est? correta e sugere a chamada
?digress?o? (172c?177c) como ponto de partida para uma interpreta??o straussiana
do di?logo como um todo. / This work examines the possibility that Socrates is attacking a straw man in the
Theaetetus, 152a, when he explains Protagoras's dictum that ?man is the measure of
all things? as embracing a vulgar form of relativism which takes knowledge as being
merely perception. It begins with Leo Strauss?s suggestion that the great writers of
the past made use of a peculiar technique, that he names metaphorically as ?writing
between the lines,? aiming to protect their heterodox views from political persecution
while expressing openly other views that conform to generally accepted opinion. It
seeks to demonstrate that Strauss?s suggestion is a valid one and that writing
between the lines was recognized throughout most Philosophy?s history and only
recently forgotten. It also seeks to clarify Strauss?s suggestion and identify a minimal
set of rules to guide the reading of that Theaetetus?s passage. In the end, it considers
that reading between the lines of the said passage can point to the conclusion that
the examined hypothesis is correct and suggests the so called ?Digression? (172c?
177c) as a starting point from where to begin a Straussian interpretation of the dialog
as a whole.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:repositorio.ufrn.br:123456789/22597 |
| Date | 12 December 2016 |
| Creators | Souza, Roberto Solino de |
| Contributors | 34302557400, Lima, Jorge dos Santos, 00014744562, http://lattes.cnpq.br/1025007884170375, Capistrano, Pablo Moreno Paiva, 78600936420, http://lattes.cnpq.br/4190976774852728, Erickson, Glenn Walter |
| Publisher | PROGRAMA DE P?S-GRADUA??O EM FILOSOFIA, UFRN, Brasil |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Source | reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRN, instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, instacron:UFRN |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
Page generated in 0.0023 seconds