Mining will remain indispensable for the foreseeable future. For millennia, our society has been exploring and exploiting mineral deposits. Consequently, most of the easily exploitable high-grade deposits, which were of primary interest given their obvious technical and economic advantages, have already been depleted. For the future, the mining sector will have to efficiently produce metals and minerals from low-grade orebodies with complex mineralogical and microstructural properties -- these are generally referred to as complex orebodies. The exploitation of such complex orebodies carries significant technical risks. However, these risks may be reduced by applying modelling tools that are reliable and robust.
In a broad sense, modelling techniques are already applied to estimate the resources and reserves contained in a deposit, and to evaluate the potential recovery (i.e., behaviour in comminution and separation processes) of these materials. This thesis focusses on the modelling of recovery processes, more specifically mineral separation processes, suited to complex ores.
Despite recent developments in the fields of process mineralogy and geometallurgy, current mineral separation modelling methods do not fully incorporate the available information on ore complexity. While it is well known that the mineralogical and microstructural properties of individual particles control their process behaviour, currently widely applied modelling methods consider only distributions of bulk particle properties, which oftentimes require much simplification of the particle data available. Moreover, many of the methods used in industrial plant design and process modelling are based on the chemical composition of the samples, which is only a proxy for the mineralogical composition of the ores.
A modelling method for mineral separation processes suited to complex ores should be particle-based, taking into consideration all quantifiable particle properties, and capable of estimating uncertainties. Moreover, to achieve a method generalizable to diverse mineral separation units (e.g., magnetic separation or flotation) with minimal human bias, strategies to independently weight the importance of different particle properties for the process(es) under investigation should be incorporated.
This dissertation introduces a novel particle-based separation modelling method which fulfills these requirements. The core of the method consists of a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator-regularized (multinomial) logistic regression model trained with a balanced particle dataset. The required particle data are collected with scanning electron microscopy-based automated mineralogy systems. Ultimately, the method can quantify the recovery probability of individual particles, with minimal human input, considering the joint influence of particle shape, size, and modal and surface compositions, for any separation process.
Three different case studies were modelled successfully using this new method, without the need for case-specific modifications: 1) the industrial recovery of pyrochlore from a carbonatite deposit with three froth flotation and one magnetic separation units, 2) the laboratory-scale magnetic separation of a complex skarn ore, and 3) the laboratory-scale separation of apatite from a sedimentary ore rich in carbonate minerals by flotation. Moreover, the generalization potential of the method was tested by predicting the process outcome of samples which had not been used in the model training phase, but came from the same geometallurgical domain of a specific ore deposit. In each of these cases, the method obtained high predictive accuracy.
In addition to its predictive power, the new particle-based separation modelling method provides detailed insights into the influence of specific particle properties on processing behaviour. To name a couple, the influence of size on the recovery of different carbonate minerals by flotation in an industrial operation; and a comparison to traditional methodologies demonstrated the limitation of only considering particle liberation in process mineralogy studies -- the associated minerals should be evaluated, too. Finally, the potential application of the method to minimize the volume of test work required in metallurgical tests was showcased with a complex ore.
The approach developed here provides a foundation for future developments, which can be used to optimize mineral separation processes based on particle properties. The opportunity exists to develop a similar approach to model the comminution of single particles and ultimately allow for the full prediction of the recovery potential of complex ores.:1 Introduction 1
1.1 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
1.2 Objectives . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
1.3 State-of-the-art in particle-based separation models . . . . . . . . . . . 11
1.4 Moving forward . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
1.4.1 Particle data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
1.4.2 Mathematical tools required for the particle-based separation
model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
1.4.3 Workflow . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
1.5 Structure of the thesis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
2 The method and its application to industrial operations 23
2.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
2.1.1 Background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
2.2 Methodology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
2.2.1 Assumptions and limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
2.2.2 Data structure and required pre-treatment . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
2.2.3 Algorithm . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
2.3 Demonstration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
2.3.1 Artificial test cases . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
2.3.2 Real case study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
2.4 Discussion and final considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
3 The robustness of the method towards compositional variations of new
feed samples 45
3.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
3.2 Generalization potential of current Particle-based Separation Model
(PSM) methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
3.3 Case study . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
3.3.1 Samples . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
3.3.2 Dry magnetic separation tests . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
3.3.3 Sample characterization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
3.3.4 Particle-based separation models . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
3.4 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
3.5 Discussion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
3.6 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
4 Flotation kinetics of individual particles 67
4.1 Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68
4.2 Method . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
4.2.1 Data collection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
4.2.2 Cumulative recovery probability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72
4.2.3 Particle-based kinetic flotation model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74
4.3 Demonstration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
4.3.1 Materials and methods . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
4.3.2 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76
4.4 Discussion and final thoughts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80
5 Conclusions and outlook 85
5.1 Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 85
5.2 Outlook . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86
Bibliography 89
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:DRESDEN/oai:qucosa:de:qucosa:81394 |
| Date | 11 January 2023 |
| Creators | Pereira, Lucas |
| Contributors | Gutzmer, Jens, Rosenkranz, Jan, TU Bergakademie Freiberg, Helmholtz Institute Freiberg for Resource Technology |
| Source Sets | Hochschulschriftenserver (HSSS) der SLUB Dresden |
| Language | English |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, doc-type:doctoralThesis, info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis, doc-type:Text |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123711, 10.1016/j.mineng.2021.107054, 10.1016/j.ijmst.2022.01.008, 10.14278/rodare.1104 |
Page generated in 0.0031 seconds