Return to search

Faz de conta que eu cresci: o processo de transi??o da educa??o infantil para o ensino fundamental

Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-04T18:33:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
Adriana Zampieri Martinati.pdf: 4869657 bytes, checksum: acf4ce5f7119bf55d063cea6eefd9b99 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2012-12-12 / The transition from Childhood Education (Educa??o Infantil EI) to Elementary School (Ensino Fundamental EF) is the topic of this study, which presents as main objective to analyze this passage from the perspective of their main characters, the children and teachers. The Brazilian Law number 11.274/06 has broadened the duration of EF to 9 years, having children entering at 6 years old; and the official documents prescribe that the transition from EI to EF shall not happen in an abrupt way, because it is a potential moment of breaches and crises which may interfere on the child s bio-psychological development. Such moment shall be lived in the most productive way possible. In this sense, the issue on this research has been formulated in the following way: How has the process of school transaction from EI to the nine-year EF taken place in both schools segment?. The specific objects are: (i) analyzing the children s interpretation on their experiences in EI and EF, (ii) identifying the teachers actions regarding the passage from EI to EF; and (iii) identifying the teachers conceptions on the mandatory entrance of six-year-old children in EF. The method, of qualitative nature, is based on the school transition process, which happens in two moments: Phase I, completed with a group of 10 children between 5 and 6 years old in a Childhood Education Municipal School (Escola Municipal de Educa??o Infantil EMEI); Phase II, completed with 4 children who were part of the previous EI group, but who now are in the 1st year of EF in an Elementary Municipal School (Escola Municipal de Ensino Fundamental EMEF), aged between 6 and 7 years old. The research instruments have been: (i) documental analysis (of the pedagogical projects in EMEI and EMEF), (ii) questionnaire for the parents, (iii), participative observation, (iv) semi-structured interview with teachers in EMEI and EMEF, (v) (reflexive and narrative) interview with the children; and (vi) drawing. The empirical material has been recorded in video and there was a daily field registration, besides, the drawings produced by the children have been kept. The results of the research indicate the absence of reciprocal references about the school transaction in both school units, which do not exist on the pedagogical projects and on the school day-by-day. There is not a systematic work on the children s future lives in EMEI; their entrance on the EMEFs is only mentioned when the children show curiosity about their new school. They know the new school will be different, and they want to change, most likely because the elementary school is socially valued. Also, in EMEF, there are few references on the children s previous lives, and it is as if a new child was born, who must adjust to the new reality through silence and body control. In this scenario, the playing, which, in the Historical-cultural theory, is the main activity of the child, is cramped. Because of the breach, the lack of articulation and of continuity in the pedagogical work, some children have signed suffering in the process of adaptation; and others, subverting the established order, have presented frequent small playful episodes during classes, somehow attenuating the loss of playing. EI and EF children give a great importance to playing; and a systematic work on the school transaction would cause relevant contributions, moreover in EF, where there is the diminution of playful activities. Therefore there is an urgent need of articulating actions between EI and EF and investing on the initial and ongoing formation of teachers, mainly regarding playful activities from the Historical-cultural theory point of view, especially when these activities are considered to be the instrument for developing superior psychological functions. The problems noticed on the implementation of the new nine-year EF are also a consequence of how the public agencies prescribe, as in laws and regulations, but do not provide, which indicates the need for debates on what our education project for childhood really is. / A transi??o da Educa??o Infantil (EI) para o Ensino Fundamental (EF) foi o tema deste trabalho, que apresentou como principal objetivo analisar essa passagem na perspectiva de seus protagonistas, as crian?as e os professores. A Lei n? 11.274/06 ampliou a dura??o do EF para 9 anos com ingresso da crian?a aos seis anos de idade e os documentos oficiais prescrevem que a transi??o da EI para o EF n?o ocorra de maneira abrupta, pois ? um momento potencial de rupturas e crises que incidem sobre o desenvolvimento biopsicol?gico da crian?a, devendo ser vivenciada de maneira mais produtiva poss?vel. Assim, o problema da presente pesquisa foi formulado da seguinte maneira: Como se tem constitu?do o processo de transi??o escolar da EI para o EF de nove anos em institui??es de ambos segmentos? . Os objetivos espec?ficos foram: (i) analisar as interpreta??es das crian?as sobre suas experi?ncias na EI e no EF, (ii) identificar as a??es das professoras relativas ? passagem da EI para o EF e (iii) identificar as concep??es das professoras sobre a obrigatoriedade do ingresso da crian?a de seis anos no EF. O m?todo, de natureza qualitativa, foi constitu?do no processo de transi??o escolar, ocorrida em dois momentos: Fase I, realizada com um grupo de 10 crian?as de 5 e 6 anos de idade de uma Escola Municipal de Educa??o Infantil (EMEI); Fase II, feita com 4 crian?as do grupo da EI, mas, agora, ingressantes do 1? ano do EF de uma Escola Municipal de Ensino Fundamental (EMEF), com idades entre 6 e 7 anos. Os instrumentos de pesquisa foram: (i) an?lise documental (projetos pedag?gicos da EMEI e da EMEF), (ii) question?rio com os pais, (iii), observa??o participante, (iv) entrevista semiestruturada com as professoras da EMEI e da EMEF, (v) entrevista com as crian?as (reflexiva e narrativa) e (vi) produ??o de desenhos. O material emp?rico foi videogravado e houve o registro em di?rio de campo e tamb?m de desenhos produzidos pelas crian?as. Os resultados da pesquisa indicaram aus?ncias de refer?ncias rec?procas sobre a transi??o escolar em ambas as institui??es de ensino, inexistentes nos projetos pedag?gicos e no cotidiano escolar. N?o h? um trabalho sistem?tico sobre a vida futura das crian?as na EMEI; men??es quanto ao seu ingresso em EMEFs s?o feitas apenas quando elas manifestam curiosidade sobre a nova escola. As crian?as sabem que a nova escola ser? diferente e querem mudar, muito provavelmente porque a escola de ensino fundamental ? socialmente valorizada. Tamb?m na EMEF, h? poucas refer?ncias ? vida pregressa das crian?as, pois ? como se nascesse uma nova crian?a, que tem que se ajustar ? nova realidade por meio do sil?ncio e do controle corporal. Nesse cen?rio, tolhe-se o brincar, que dentro da Teoria Hist?rico-Cultural, ? a principal atividade da crian?a. Em fun??o da ruptura, da desarticula??o e descontinuidade do trabalho pedag?gico, algumas crian?as sinalizaram sofrimento no processo de adapta??o e outras, subvertendo a ordem estabelecida, realizaram frequentes microepis?dios l?dicos em sala de aula, de certo modo, atenuando a perda do brincar. As crian?as da EI e do EF atribuem grande import?ncia ao brincar e um trabalho sistem?tico sobre a transi??o escolar traria contribui??es relevantes, sobretudo no EF, onde h? o esmaecimento da atividade l?dica. Portanto, urge a necessidade de a??es articuladoras entre a EI e o EF e o investimento na forma??o inicial e continuada de docentes, principalmente no que diz respeito ? atividade l?dica ? luz da Teoria Hist?rico-Cultural, sobretudo, quando se considera esta atividade como instrumento do desenvolvimento das fun??es psicol?gicas superiores. Os problemas evidenciados sobre a implanta??o do novo EF s?o tamb?m consequ?ncia da forma pela qual o poder p?blico prescreve, como em leis e normas, mas n?o prov?, indicando a necessidade de debates sobre qual ?, de fato, nosso projeto para a educa??o da inf?ncia.

Identiferoai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede.bibliotecadigital.puc-campinas.edu.br:tede/706
Date12 December 2012
CreatorsMartinati, Adriana Zampieri
ContributorsRocha, Maria Silvia Pinto de Moura Librandi da, Azevedo, Heloisa Helena Oliveira de, Mello, Maria Aparecida
PublisherPontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica de Campinas, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Educa??o, PUC-Campinas, BR, CCHSA ? Centro de Ci?ncias Humanas e Sociais Aplicadas
Source SetsIBICT Brazilian ETDs
LanguagePortuguese
Detected LanguageEnglish
Typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
Formatapplication/pdf
Sourcereponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_CAMPINAS, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Campinas, instacron:PUC_CAMP
Rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess

Page generated in 0.0027 seconds