Submitted by Setor de Tratamento da Informa??o - BC/PUCRS (tede2@pucrs.br) on 2015-04-17T14:42:51Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
467469 - Texto Parcial.pdf: 238794 bytes, checksum: a0be4ae27e4c9c5a7025a7dae589e374 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2015-04-17T14:42:51Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
467469 - Texto Parcial.pdf: 238794 bytes, checksum: a0be4ae27e4c9c5a7025a7dae589e374 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2015-03-13 / This dissertation analyzes the implementation of the general repercussion on the legal framework of extraordinary appeals and the impact of the decisions delivered by the Supreme Court on the corresponding constitutional issues. This work studies the origins of the institute, in order to understand what has motivated the introduction of a precedent respecting system in Brazilian law. Identifies the difficulties, the resistances and risks on transposing mechanisms forged in the legal culture of the common law, to a dogmatic paradigm, which gives to statute law, with its generality and abstraction, the role of being the gravitational center of the entire legal system. Investigates the phenomena of objectification on constitutionality diffuse control and the abstraction of the constitutional issue from extraordinary appeals. Compares the developing system in Brazil with the common law model, warning for the differences in the precedent generation in either system, and for the difficulties involving the subsequent ratio decidendi extraction from a general repercussion precedent, formed with conviction elements located far beyond the case individually elected as a paradigm. It argues that in the new system, the function of carrying out justice is reserved to originary judicial organs while is reserved for the Supreme Court the role of being a Constitutional Court. Defending the importance on acknowleging in Supreme Court decision authentic sources of law, the study recognizes the changing potential on establishing a precedent respecting system in Brazil. Alerts, however, to the risk of throwback, in case of not noticing the biases which whom the entire legal community is historically conditioned, the peculiarities of local precedents, and the tendency to adopt a syllogistic-deductive structure of decision, in which such precedents could start to occupy the same role already reserved for the law, in its generality and abstraction. / Esta disserta??o analisa a implanta??o da repercuss?o geral no regime de julgamento dos recursos extraordin?rios e o impacto das decis?es proferidas pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal sobre as correspondentes quest?es constitucionais. Estuda as origens do instituto, com o prop?sito de compreender o que vem motivando a introdu??o de um sistema de respeito aos precedentes no direito brasileiro. Identifica as dificuldades, as resist?ncias e os riscos da transposi??o de mecanismos forjados na cultura jur?dica do common law, para um paradigma dogm?tico, que atribui ? lei, com sua generalidade e abstra??o, a fun??o de centro gravitacional de todo o sistema jur?dico. Investiga os fen?menos da objetiva??o do controle difuso de constitucionalidade e da abstra??o da quest?o constitucional frente aos recursos extraordin?rios e compara o sistema em desenvolvimento no Brasil com o modelo do common law, alertando para as diferen?as na forma??o do precedente em cada sistema, e para as dificuldades que envolvem a subsequente extra??o da ratio decidendi em um precedente de repercuss?o geral, para cuja forma??o contribuem elementos de convic??o situados muito al?m dos pertinentes ao caso individualmente eleito como paradigma. Sustenta que no novo modelo, a fun??o de realizar a justi?a em concreto ? das inst?ncias ordin?rias, enquanto ao STF deve ser reservado o papel de Corte Constitucional. Defendendo a import?ncia de que se atribua a condi??o de fontes prim?rias do direito ?s decis?es da Suprema Corte, reconhece o potencial transformador da implanta??o de um sistema de respeito aos precedentes no Brasil, advertindo, por?m, para os riscos de retrocesso, acaso n?o se percebam os vieses a que toda a comunidade jur?dica est? historicamente condicionada, as peculiaridades dos precedentes aqui formados, e a tend?ncia ? ado??o de uma estrutura silog?stico-dedutiva de decis?o, em que as decis?es dos tribunais superiores passem a ocupar o mesmo papel reservado ? lei, em sua generalidade e abstra??o.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/5909 |
| Date | 13 March 2015 |
| Creators | Ferraz, Ta?s Schilling |
| Contributors | Neto Facchini, Eug?nio |
| Publisher | Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Direito, PUCRS, Brasil, Faculdade de Direito |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, instacron:PUC_RS |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | -1046629855937119302, 600, 600, 600, 2194221341323903125, -7277407233034425144 |
Page generated in 0.0024 seconds