Submitted by Setor de Tratamento da Informa??o - BC/PUCRS (tede2@pucrs.br) on 2015-09-01T11:33:54Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
474354 - Texto Parcial.pdf: 238914 bytes, checksum: edf3e6bfd95aff4882ce4536c317308c (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2015-09-01T11:33:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
474354 - Texto Parcial.pdf: 238914 bytes, checksum: edf3e6bfd95aff4882ce4536c317308c (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2015-07-15 / The research henceforth presented was aimed to establish a scientific study on the Brazilian proportional electoral system, taking the principle of the popular sovereignty as its nuclear variable, supported over two premises, the limit and the possibility. The discussion itself is now new, but the approach is unpublished. Two bases have been thought to reach the conclusion, the first, the historical search of the meaning of Democracy, since the ancient times up until the implanted model in Brazil during its empire as well as republic regimes. The second basis was developed from a conception of political representation built in accordance with the principle of popular sovereignty as it is expressed in the Federal Constitution. A parallel was made with the German electoral system, mainly due to the perception of a kind of preference by the national researchers in relation to such system. Finally, we get to the core point the work, which is the critical study of the Brazilian proportional electoral system, on which a variety of aspects were found to stop it from carrying out the principle of popular sovereignty, making it dependent on a practical and theoretical rationalization so that it may reach the desired proportionality and, thus, giving effectiveness to its main goal, which is the political legitimacy in the present constitutional law ground. / O trabalho que se apresenta teve o objetivo de estabelecer um estudo cient?fico do sistema eleitoral proporcional brasileiro, tomando-se como vari?vel a realiza??o do princ?pio da soberania popular, a partir dos dois extremos, o limite e a possibilidade. A discuss?o em si n?o ? nova, mas a abordagem ? evidentemente in?dita. Dois alicerces foram forjados para a constru??o da conclus?o, o primeiro, a busca hist?rica do sentido de Democracia, desde a antiguidade at? o regime adotado pelo Brasil imperial e republicano. O segundo alicerce foi o desenvolvimento de uma concep??o de representatividade pol?tica que fosse consent?nea com o princ?pio da soberania popular tal como se encontra exposto na Constitui??o Federal. Um contraponto foi feito com o sistema eleitoral alem?o, principalmente pela constata??o de uma predile??o dos te?ricos nacionais em rela??o a esse sistema. Enfim, se chega ao ponto nuclear do trabalho, que ? o estudo cr?tico do sistema eleitoral proporcional brasileiro, sobre o qual se constatou um conjunto de aspectos que o impedem de realizar o princ?pio da soberania popular, tornando-o carente de uma racionaliza??o te?rica e pr?tica para que alcance a proporcionalidade e, assim, realize este objetivo primordial, que ? o de legitimar a representa??o pol?tica no arcabou?o constitucional vigente.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/6284 |
| Date | 15 July 2015 |
| Creators | Costa , Jo?o Santos da |
| Contributors | Souza, Draiton Gonzaga de |
| Publisher | Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Direito, PUCRS, Brasil, Faculdade de Direito |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, instacron:PUC_RS |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | -1046629855937119302, 600, 600, 600, 2194221341323903125, -7277407233034425144 |
Page generated in 0.0019 seconds