Submitted by PPG Economia do desenvolvimento (economia-pg@pucrs.br) on 2018-05-14T21:07:30Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
LUIS_EDUARDO_DOS_SANTOS_BERNICKER_DIS.pdf: 1843230 bytes, checksum: c8e933bc53c1c7be486e12138a9c3a6b (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Sheila Dias (sheila.dias@pucrs.br) on 2018-05-18T18:52:42Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1
LUIS_EDUARDO_DOS_SANTOS_BERNICKER_DIS.pdf: 1843230 bytes, checksum: c8e933bc53c1c7be486e12138a9c3a6b (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-05-18T19:08:48Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
LUIS_EDUARDO_DOS_SANTOS_BERNICKER_DIS.pdf: 1843230 bytes, checksum: c8e933bc53c1c7be486e12138a9c3a6b (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2018-03-27 / In many countries it is observed that investment in knowledge infrastructure through universities is used as an inducer of economic growth for the regions (Goldstein and Renault, 2004). Thus, the article aims to investigate the expansion policy of the federal campuses held between the years 2000 to 2012 for all municipalities that have benefited from this policy. The effects of the opening of campuses will be measured on economic growth through the logarithm of real GDP per capita, and on the proportion of workers in the service sector, commerce, manufacturing industry and all sectors together. The study period covers two official expansion policies, the first one started in 2003 and was the Phase I Expansion Program that lasted until 2007. The second was the REUNI (Restructuring and Expansion of Federal Universities) that ran from 2007 to 2012. Both plans had as objective the expansion in the number of universities and federal campuses. In the meantime, REUNI focused on expanding existing universities' infrastructures. In 2000, Brazil had 39 universities and 73 federal campuses, and in 2012, the number moved to 59 universities and 219 campuses, more than doubling the number of campuses in the country. It should be noted that most of the municipalities that received new federal campuses are located in the interior of the country, receiving approximately 84% of the new campuses created during this period. The method used was that of difference-differences with propensity score matching that allows to identify the effect of public policy controlling for observable and unobservable characteristics. The results show that there were no positive and significant impacts on the average log of real GDP per capita and the proportion of workers in the manufacturing industry of those municipalities that received a new federal campus, however, in the services, commerce and when analyzed all sectors together is observed a positive effect on the creation of new jobs. / Em muitos pa?ses ? observado que ? usado o investimento em infraestrutura de conhecimento por meio das universidades como polos indutores de crescimento econ?mico para as regi?es (Goldstein e Renault, 2004). Assim, o artigo visa investigar a pol?tica de expans?o dos campi federais realizada entre os anos de 2000 a 2012 para todos os munic?pios que foram beneficiados com essa pol?tica. Os efeitos da abertura de campi ser?o medidos sobre o crescimento econ?mico por meio do logaritmo do PIB real per capita, e sobre a propor??o de trabalhadores do setor de servi?os, com?rcio, ind?stria de transforma??o e todos os setores em conjunto. O per?odo de estudo abrange duas pol?ticas de expans?o oficiais sendo que a primeira foi iniciada em 2003 e foi o Programa Expans?o Fase I que durou at? 2007. A segunda foi o REUNI (Reestrutura??o e Expans?o das Universidades Federais) que funcionou de 2007 a 2012. Ambos os planos possu?am como objetivo a expans?o no n?mero de universidades e campi federais. Entretanto, o REUNI focou em expandir as infraestruturas j? existentes das universidades. No ano de 2000, o Brasil possu?a 39 universidades e 73 campi federais e, em 2012, o n?mero passou para 59 universidades e 219 campi, mais que dobrando a quantidade de campi no pa?s. Cabe destacar que, a maioria dos munic?pios que receberam novos campi federais est?o localizados no interior do pa?s ao receber aproximadamente 84% dos novos campi criados nesse per?odo. O m?todo utilizado foi o de diferen?a-diferen?as com o propensity score matching que permite identificar o efeito da pol?tica p?blica controlando por caracter?sticas observ?veis e n?o observ?veis. Os resultados mostram que, n?o houve impactos positivos e significantes sobre a m?dia do logaritmo do PIB real per capita e na propor??o de trabalhadores da ind?stria de transforma??o daqueles munic?pios que receberam um novo campus federal, entretanto, nos setores de servi?os, com?rcio e quando analisado todos os setores conjuntamente ? observado um efeito positivo na cria??o de novos empregos.
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.pucrs.br:tede/8067 |
| Date | 27 March 2018 |
| Creators | Bernicker, Lu?s Eduardo dos Santos |
| Contributors | Fran?a, Marco T?lio Aniceto |
| Publisher | Pontif?cia Universidade Cat?lica do Rio Grande do Sul, Programa de P?s-Gradua??o em Economia do Desenvolvimento, PUCRS, Brasil, Escola de Neg?cios |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da PUC_RS, instname:Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul, instacron:PUC_RS |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | -5405171042897922792, 500, 500, 500, 944455694546435801, -2504903392600098822 |
Page generated in 0.0023 seconds