Submitted by Verena Pereira (verenagoncalves@uefs.br) on 2018-11-13T23:00:30Z
No. of bitstreams: 1
disserta??o Rebeca S de Barros.pdf: 7670296 bytes, checksum: 8b504869fadbfd883d41351c76ac6022 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-11-13T23:00:30Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
disserta??o Rebeca S de Barros.pdf: 7670296 bytes, checksum: 8b504869fadbfd883d41351c76ac6022 (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2015-12-18 / The Institutional Support, methodological strategy for co-management, emerges as an innovation for the expansion of institutional democracy in the Unified Health System being experienced at the municipal, state and federal level. For practicing the Support, Campos (2007b), PNH (BRAZIL, 2008); Bertussi (2010) and Oliveira (2011) recommend a capacity of negotiation, facilitation of processes, action from the everyday, Collective Spaces activation and ability to do together with the people instead of doing for them. Whereas there are several meanings to those recommendations and diversity in its operation, it is a challenge the professional development of the supporters. The aim of this methodological development study was to elaborate and validate an instrument in order to assess the work process of supporters and teams of support from a semantic and content point of view. The literature review pointed out the lack of scientific papers related to job evaluation process in Support. The documentary research (2008-2011) of the competency records of institutional supporter discussed by the employees of the Primary Care Directorate of Health Department of Bahia State and the methodological theoretical deepening enabled the defining attributes: Observation and Listening; Porosity; Ability of Trading; Proposition of Offers; Activation of the Collective Spaces and Teamwork. The process of development and validation of content and semantics was based according to the procedures of the European project DISABKIDS. The content validation done by five judges, from the percentage of agreement, assessed the relevance of the attributes of the study in question. The semantic validation, by 27 institutional supporters linked to federal, state or municipal organizations verified the understanding that each supporter had in each one of the attributes. The Mandala Assessment, a tool based on the Permanent Education in Health, Appreciative evaluation and participatory management, consists of a radar chart, six attributes, answer scale, score standardization based on quartiles and typology for the development of the Function Support, practical guidelines for the use, and intends to propose clues to the assessment process, orientation and permanent education of institutional supporters / O Apoio Institucional, estrat?gia metodol?gica para a cogest?o, surge como
inova??o para a amplia??o da democracia institucional no Sistema ?nico de Sa?de sendo experimentada no n?vel municipal, estadual e federal. Para a pr?tica do Apoio, Campos (2007b), PNH (BRASIL, 2008); Bertussi (2010) e Oliveira (2011) recomendam a capacidade de negocia??o, facilita??o de processos, a??o a partir do cotidiano, ativa??o de Espa?os Coletivos e capacidade de fazer junto com as pessoas e n?o em lugar delas. Considerando que existam diversos sentidos para tais recomenda??es e diversidade em sua operacionaliza??o, ? um desafio o desenvolvimento profissional dos apoiadores. O objetivo deste estudo de desenvolvimento metodol?gico foi elaborar e validar um instrumento para avalia??o do processo de trabalho de apoiadores e equipes de Apoio do ponto de vista sem?ntico e de conte?do. A revis?o de literatura apontou a car?ncia de publica??o de artigos cient?ficos relacionados a avalia??o do processo de trabalho no Apoio. A pesquisa documental (2008 a 2011) dos registros das compet?ncias do apoiador institucional discutidas pelos trabalhadores da Diretoria de Aten??o B?sica do Estado da Bahia e o aprofundamento te?rico metodol?gico, permitiu a defini??o dos atributos: Observa??o e Escuta; Porosidade; Capacidade de Negocia??o; Proposi??o de Ofertas; Ativa??o de Espa?os Coletivos e Trabalho em Equipe. O processo de elabora??o e valida??o de conte?do e sem?ntica se fundamentou nos procedimentos do projeto europeu DISABKIDS. A valida??o de conte?do por cinco ju?zes, a partir da porcentagem de concord?ncia, avaliou a relev?ncia dos atributos ao constructo em quest?o. A valida??o sem?ntica, por 27 apoiadores institucionais vinculados a organiza??es de n?vel federal, estadual ou municipal verificou a compreens?o que cada apoiador tinha de cada um dos atributos. A Mandala de Avalia??o, instrumento alicer?ado na Educa??o Permanente em Sa?de, na Avalia??o Apreciativa e na gest?o participativa, ? composta por um gr?fico de radar, seis atributos, escala de respostas, padroniza??o de escore baseada em quartis e tipologia quanto ao desenvolvimento da Fun??o Apoio, guia pr?tico com orienta??es para utiliza??o e, pretende propor pistas para o processo avaliativo, orienta??o e Educa??o Permanente de apoiadores institucionais
| Identifer | oai:union.ndltd.org:IBICT/oai:tede2.uefs.br:8080:tede/716 |
| Date | 18 December 2015 |
| Creators | De Barros, Rebeca Silva |
| Contributors | Pereira, Maria Bistafa Jos? |
| Publisher | Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, Mestrado Profissional em Sa?de Coletiva, UEFS, Brasil, DEPARTAMENTO DE SA?DE |
| Source Sets | IBICT Brazilian ETDs |
| Language | Portuguese |
| Detected Language | English |
| Type | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion, info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
| Format | application/pdf |
| Source | reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da UEFS, instname:Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana, instacron:UEFS |
| Rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| Relation | -2122225376607208326, 600, 600, 600, 1006395569471477890, -6173167103754495199 |
Page generated in 0.0027 seconds