Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T14:47:07Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 SamillyMDL_DISSERT.pdf: 2432551 bytes, checksum: 39a06155ddac056ef776f3527c721cf7 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-08-01 / The therapeutic adherence is still a big problem among people with venous ulcers (VU) because the treatment is long, expensive and demand changes in lifestyle. In this context, this study aims to examine treatment adherence and quality of life (QOL) of people with VU assisted at primary health care. This is an analytical, cross-sectional study with a quantitative approach to treatment and data analysis. The study had the scenario 13 Family Health Units and 02 Units Mixed of Natal. The target population consisted of 44 persons with UV indicated by the teams of the Family Health Strategy between February and April 2014. Three instruments were used: an instrument to characterize the sociodemographic, health and care aspects, the Multidimensional Scale of Adherence Therapy composed of the dimensions: healthy lifestyle, compressive therapy and neurovascular monitoring and the Charing Cross Venous Ulcer Questionnaire (CCVUQ) that evaluates QOL in persons with VU composed by the domains: Total Score, Social Interaction, Domestic Activities, Aesthetics and Emotional State. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee in Research of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, CAAE: 07556312.0.0000.5537. The data concerning the sociodemographic characteristics showed that there was a predominance of females (65.9%), age range as of 60 years (59.1%) and income of up to 1 minimum wage (81.8%). With the characterization of health, it was evident that most people reported chronic diseases (63.6%), sleep more than 6 hours (81.8%), present pain (81.8%), denying alcoholism (86 4%) and smoking (77.3%) and showed a number greater than or equal to 1 (77.3%) recurrences. Concerning the therapeutic adherence was found that in the dimension compressive therapy there poor adherence. No associations between the domains of adherence and sociodemographic and health variables were found. Was observed, however, better adherence among individuals without pain and with higher schooling. When analyzed the averages of the dimensions of therapeutic adherence with the care characteristics there was statistical significance between: adherence to compression therapy and guidance for use of compressive therapy (p = 0.002) and guidance for regular exercise (p = 0.026). Considering the mean of total score of CCVUQ (mean 51.47, SD 18.33) it is observed that the overall QOL of respondents has approximate value of the median of the scale (50). The mean of the domain Social Interaction (mean 44.23, SD 21.38) and Domestic Activities (mean 45.70, SD 23.21) were those who reported better QOL. There were weak correlations but significant between adherence to healthy lifestyle and Domains Total Score (p = 0.012), social interaction (p-value = 0.048), Aesthetics (p-value = 0.025) and Emotional State (0.017) of CCVUQ. From the data analysis it is concluded that among people with UV, there poor adherence to compressive therapy. Furthermore, we found no statistically significant association between treatment adherence and sociodemographic and health characteristics. It is added that there was a correlation between the healthy lifestyle dimension and domains CCVUQ / A ades?o terap?utica ainda ? um grande problema entre pessoas com ?lceras venosas (UV), uma vez que a presen?a dessa les?o demanda um tratamento longo, dispendioso, e altera??es no estilo de vida. Nesse contexto, este estudo tem como objetivo geral analisar a ades?o ao tratamento e a qualidade de vida (QV) das pessoas com UV atendidas na aten??o prim?ria ? sa?de. Trata-se de estudo anal?tico, transversal, com abordagem quantitativa de tratamento e an?lise de dados. O estudo teve como cen?rio 13 Unidades de Sa?de da Fam?lia e duas Unidades Mistas da cidade de Natal. A amostra foi composta por 44 pessoas com UV indicadas pelas equipes da Estrat?gia Sa?de da Fam?lia entre fevereiro e abril de 2014. Utilizaram-se tr?s instrumentos: instrumento de caracteriza??o dos aspectos sociodemogr?ficos, de sa?de e assistenciais; a Escala Multidimensional de Ades?o Terap?utica, composta pelas dimens?es: estilo de vida saud?vel, terapia compressiva e vigil?ncia neurovascular; e o Charing Cross Venous Ulcer Questionnaire (CCVUQ), que avalia QV em pessoas com UV atrav?s de quatro dom?nios: Intera??o Social, Atividades Dom?sticas, Est?tica e Estado Emocional, al?m de gerar um Escore Total. A pesquisa obteve parecer favor?vel do Comit? de ?tica em Pesquisa da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte, CAAE: 07556312.0.0000.5537. Os dados referentes ? caracteriza??o sociodemogr?fica demonstraram que houve predomin?ncia do sexo feminino (65,9%), da faixa et?ria a partir de 60 anos (59,1%) e renda de at? 1 sal?rio m?nimo (81,8%). A caracteriza??o de sa?de evidenciou que a maioria das pessoas relatou doen?as cr?nicas associadas (63,6%), sono maior que 6 horas (81,8%), presen?a de dor (81,8%) e mais de uma recidiva (77,3%). A maior parte negou etilismo (86,4%) e tabagismo (77,3%). Em rela??o ? ades?o terap?utica verificou-se pior ades?o na dimens?o terapia compressiva. N?o foram encontradas associa??es entre os dom?nios da ades?o e as vari?veis sociodemogr?ficas e de sa?de. Observou-se, no entanto, melhor ades?o entre os indiv?duos sem dor e com maior escolaridade. Ao analisar a rela??o das dimens?es da ades?o terap?utica com as caracter?sticas da assist?ncia observou-se associa??o entre: ades?o ? terapia compressiva e orienta??es para uso de terapia compressiva (p-valor = 0,002) e para exerc?cios regulares (p-valor = 0,026). Considerando a m?dia do escore total do CCVUQ (m?dia 51,47 e DP 18,33) observa-se que a QV geral dos pesquisados tem valor aproximado ao da mediana da escala (50). Os participantes apresentaram melhor qualidade de vida nos dom?nios Intera??o Social e Atividades Dom?sticas. Verificaram-se correla??es significativas, por?m fracas, entre ades?o ao estilo de vida saud?vel e o Escore Total (p = 0,012), Intera??o Social (p = 0,048), Est?tica (p = 0,025) e Estado Emocional (p = 0,017) do CCVUQ. A partir da an?lise dos dados conclui-se que a maior dificuldade de ades?o entre as pessoas com UV refere-se ? terapia compressiva. Observou-se correla??o apenas entre a dimens?o estilo de vida saud?vel e os dom?nios do CCVUQ

Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T14:46:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 IsabelleKFC_TESE.pdf: 2724396 bytes, checksum: 3b262a5786188d2dec0fcd890fc26fd4 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2013-02-05 / Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior / People with venous ulcers constitute as an important public health problem, its treatment is onerous and require assistance provided by trained professionals, systematized through protocols, however what lies in the assistance is that the management of this group of people differs from that preconized in the scientific literature, interfering with wound healing and quality of life of affected. In this sense, the construction of a assistance protocol specific to people with venous ulcers (VU) can help professionals of the Family Health Strategy both in patient assessment as and in establishment of quality assistance. Thus, this study aimed to analyse the validity of a multiprofessional assistance protocol for people with venous ulcers in primary care by health professionals using Delphi technique. This is a quantitative study, the methodological type conducted in two steps: first step related to integrative literature review to subsidize the development of the protocol, then these aspects were organized and proposed to the judges of the study through the Delphi technique. The study was initiated after approval by the Research Ethics Committee. The first step was performed between August and September 2012, in the virtual library of health, in the page of the Coordination of Improvement of Higher Education Personnel, of Municipal Health Secretariat and international guidelines of associations and in the subsequent step carried out between September 2012 to January 2013, was performed search by Lattes platform of the National Council of Technological and Scientific Development, in order to identify health professionals in Brazil who act as judges of the instrument and then, via online, the form was submitted to them.The sample for the second step was 51 judges in the first round and 35 for the second round Delphi. The analysis was done by adopting Kappa index ≥ 0.81 and Content Validity Index (CVI)> 0.80. In the first submission for the judges, items that did not reach Kappa and CVI established were: request / realization / test results, demographic data, medical history, risk factors, verification of pain / vital signs / pulse / infection signs / lesion location/ edema and pain treatment. After removal of items which have not obtained Kappa or CVI index established, it was found achieving optimal levels of these index for the categories. In the next step was the ressubmiss?o of protocol to judges through the Delphi technique in it was found that, of the 15 categories of the protocol, 12 presented higher scores in Delphi 2 phase and the other three categories remained the same Kappa and IVC of the previous phase. As for the average of evaluation requirements of the protocol was found that the scores assigned by the judges were higher in the second phase in nine of the 10 items, remaining the same in only one of the items indicating validity of the instrument before the consensus of the judges. Thus, we accepted the alternative hypothesis in this study, as they were obtained in the second Delphi phase the validity index greater than or equal to the Delphi 1 phase. The formulation of this assistance protocol valid and reproducible will enable a reorganization and redesign of assistance, with standardization of actions and continuity of care for persons with venous ulcers in primary health care / As pessoas com ?lcera venosa constituem-se um importante problema de sa?de p?blica, o seu tratamento ? oneroso e necessitam de uma assist?ncia prestada por profissionais capacitados, sistematizada por meio de protocolos, contudo o que se encontra na assist?ncia ? que o manejo a este grupo de pessoas difere do que ? preconizado na literatura cient?fica, interferindo na cicatriza??o da ferida e na qualidade de vida dos acometidos. Nesse sentido, a constru??o de um protocolo de assist?ncia espec?fico para pessoas com ?lcera venosa (UV) pode auxiliar os profissionais da Estrat?gia Sa?de da Fam?lia tanto na avalia??o do paciente como no estabelecimento de uma assist?ncia de qualidade. Assim, este estudo objetivou analisar a validade de um protocolo de assist?ncia multiprofissional a pessoas com ?lcera venosa na aten??o prim?ria por profissionais de sa?de mediante t?cnica Delphi. Trata-se de um estudo quantitativo, do tipo metodol?gico realizado em duas etapas: primeira etapa referente a revis?o integrativa da literatura para subsidiar a elabora??o do protocolo; em seguida, esses aspectos foram organizados e propostos aos ju?zes do estudo por meio da t?cnica Delphi. O estudo foi iniciado ap?s aprova??o do Comit? de ?tica em Pesquisa. A primeira etapa foi realizada entre agosto e setembro de 2012, na biblioteca virtual de sa?de, na p?gina da Coordena??o de Aperfei?oamento de Pessoal de N?vel Superior, de Secretarias Municipais de Sa?de e guidelines de associa??es internacionais e na etapa subsequente realizada no per?odo de setembro de 2012 a janeiro de 2013, realizou-se busca por meio da plataforma Lattes do Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cient?fico e Tecnol?gico, a fim de identificar profissionais de sa?de do Brasil que atuassem como ju?zes do instrumento e em seguida, via online, submeteu-se o formul?rio aos pesquisados. A amostra para a segunda etapa foi de 51 ju?zes na primeira rodada e de 35 para a segunda rodada Delphi. A an?lise foi feita adotando-se ?ndice Kappa ≥0,81 e ?ndice de Validade de Conte?do (IVC)>0,80. Na primeira submiss?o aos ju?zes, os itens que n?o atingiram os ?ndices Kappa e IVC estabelecidos pertenciam as categorias: solicita??o/ realiza??o/ resultados de exames, dados sociodemogr?ficos, anamnese, fatores de risco, verifica??o de dor/ sinais vitais/ pulso/ sinais de infec??o/ localiza??o da les?o/ edema e tratamento da dor. Ap?s a remo??o dos itens que n?o obtiveram os ?ndices Kappa ou IVC estabelecidos, verificou-se alcance de n?veis ?timos desses ?ndices para as categorias. Na etapa seguinte houve a ressubmiss?o do protocolo aos ju?zes por meio da t?cnica Delphi em que se verificou que, das 15 categorias do protocolo, 12 apresentaram melhores escores na fase Delphi 2 e as outras tr?s categorias mantiveram os mesmos ?ndices Kappa e IVC da fase anterior. Quanto ? m?dia dos requisitos de avalia??o do protocolo verificou-se que as notas atribu?das pelos ju?zes na segunda fase foram maiores em nove dos 10 itens, permanecendo a mesma em apenas um dos itens indicando validade do instrumento perante o consenso dos ju?zes. Assim, aceita-se a hip?tese alternativa no estudo, a medida que foram obtidos na fase Delphi 2 ?ndices de validade maiores ou iguais aos da fase Delphi1. A formula??o deste protocolo de assist?ncia v?lido pode embasar a reorganiza??o e replanejamento da assist?ncia, com padroniza??o das a??es e a continuidade da assist?ncia ?s pessoas com ?lcera venosa na aten??o prim?ria

Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T14:46:56Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 DanieleVD_TESE.pdf: 4938953 bytes, checksum: ba81cf3eb020178b1818aa9393647bed (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-06-06 / Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte / Venous ulcers are lesions resulting from chronic venous insufficiency, venous valvular abnormalities and venous thrombosis. Its occurrence has been growing with the increase in life expectancy of the world population. Considered as fundamental aspects in the approach to the person with venous ulcer care with the interdisciplinary approach, adoption of protocol-specific knowledge, technical skill, coordination between levels of care complexity of the Health System and active participation of patients and their families, a holistic perspective. The construction of a clinical protocol for people with venous ulcers can help professionals of high complexity services in patient assessment and the establishment of quality care in a systematic way and focused on the factors that interfere with wound healing. Thus, this study aimed to analyze the evidence of validation of a clinical protocol for people with venous ulcers treated at high-complexity services. This is a methodological study with a quantitative approach, developed in three stages: literature review, evidence of content validity and evidence of validation in the clinical context. Approved by the Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte Research Ethics Committee (Opinion: 147.452 and CAAE: 07556312.0.0000.5537). The literature review was conducted in August and September 2012, becoming the basis for the construction of the protocol. Then the evidence of content validity, which included 53 judges (experts) selected by the Lattes platform to evaluate the protocol items was performed. The judges were contacted by e-mail and rated the protocol via Google Docs <docs.google.com>. After analyzing the ratios obtained in this step, which reported kappa between 0.75 and 0.96 and between 0.80 and 0.98 IVC, and the suggestions of the judges, the protocol was adjusted and subjected to empirical evidence to validate the clinical setting at the University Hospital Onofre Lopes in Natal / RN. Evidence of validation in the clinical setting involved 4 judges who acted in pairs (paired) evaluated 32 patients with venous ulcers in the clinical context of high complexity. In both stages, we used the Kappa Index and Content Validity Index to analyze the responses of the judges. The parameters set as acceptable for these indices were: Kappa &#8805; 0.61 and Content Validity Index > 0.80. Any evidence of content validity, as evidence of validation in the clinical context, the protocol items that have not reached Kappa and Content Validity Index established indices were excluded and some items were modified or added after suggestions. The process of content validation evidence and evidence of validation in the clinical setting allowed the improvement of the protocol for the care of people with venous ulcers initially proposed. The initial version of the protocol, built from the literature, contained 15 categories and 108 items; after evidence of content validity, remained the reduction to 15 categories with 91 items; the final version, clinically validated, is composed of the same 15 categories, 76 items. The protocol was validated in its content and in the clinical aspect, so we accepted the alternative hypothesis in the study. This protocol may contribute to the care system, allowing tailor behaviors and promote greater resolution in the treatment of people with venous ulcers in health services of high complexity / As ?lceras venosas s?o les?es resultantes da insufici?ncia venosa cr?nica, anomalias valvulares venosas e trombose venosa. Sua ocorr?ncia vem crescendo com o aumento da expectativa de vida da popula??o mundial. Consideram-se aspectos fundamentais na abordagem ? pessoa com ?lcera venosa a assist?ncia com atua??o interdisciplinar, ado??o de protocolo, conhecimento espec?fico, habilidade t?cnica, articula??o entre os n?veis de complexidade assistencial do Sistema ?nico de Sa?de e participa??o ativa dos pacientes e seus familiares, em uma perspectiva hol?stica. A constru??o de um protocolo assistencial para pessoas com ?lcera venosa pode auxiliar os profissionais dos servi?os de alta complexidade na avalia??o do paciente e no estabelecimento de uma assist?ncia de qualidade, de forma sistematizada e focada nos fatores que interferem na cicatriza??o da les?o. Assim, este estudo objetivou analisar as evid?ncias de valida??o de um protocolo assistencial para pessoas com ?lceras venosas atendidas em servi?os de alta complexidade. Trata-se de um estudo metodol?gico, com abordagem quantitativa, desenvolvido em tr?s etapas: revis?o da literatura, evid?ncia de valida??o de conte?do e evid?ncia de valida??o no contexto cl?nico. Aprovado pelo Comit? de ?tica em Pesquisa da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (Parecer: 147.452 e CAAE: 07556312.0.0000.5537). A revis?o da literatura foi realizada em agosto e setembro de 2012, tornando-se a base para a constru??o do protocolo. Em seguida, foi realizada a evid?ncia de valida??o de conte?do, que incluiu 53 ju?zes (especialistas) selecionados por meio da plataforma Lattes, para avaliar os itens do protocolo. Os ju?zes foram contatados por e-mail e avaliaram o protocolo via Google Docs <docs.google.com>. Ap?s a an?lise dos ?ndices obtidos nesta etapa, que apresentaram Kappa entre 0,75 e 0,96 e IVC entre 0,80 e 0,98, e as sugest?es dos ju?zes, o protocolo foi ajustado e submetido ? evid?ncia de valida??o no contexto cl?nico, no Hospital Universit?rio Onofre Lopes em Natal/RN. A evid?ncia de valida??o no contexto cl?nico envolveu quatro ju?zes, que atuaram em duplas (pareados), avaliando 32 pacientes com ?lceras venosas no contexto cl?nico de alta complexidade. Nas duas etapas, utilizaram-se o ?ndice Kappa e ?ndice de Validade de Conte?do para analisar as respostas dos ju?zes. Os par?metros estabelecidos como aceit?veis para esses ?ndices foram: Kappa &#8805; 0,61 e ?ndice de Validade de Conte?do > 0,80.Tanto na evid?ncia de valida??o de conte?do, como na evid?ncia de valida??o no contexto cl?nico, os itens do protocolo que n?o atingiram os ?ndices Kappa e ?ndice de Validade de Conte?do estabelecidos foram exclu?dos e alguns itens foram modificados ou inclu?dos ap?s sugest?es. Os processos de evid?ncia de valida??o de conte?do e evid?ncia de valida??o no contexto cl?nico permitiram o aprimoramento do protocolo para o cuidado ? pessoa com ?lcera venosa, proposto inicialmente. A vers?o inicial do protocolo, constru?do a partir da literatura, continha 15 categorias e 108 itens; ap?s a evid?ncia de valida??o de conte?do, mantiveram-se as 15 categorias com redu??o para 91 itens; a vers?o final, validada clinicamente, ? composta das mesmas 15 categorias, sendo 76 itens. O protocolo foi validado em seu conte?do e no aspecto cl?nico, sendo assim, aceitou-se a hip?tese alternativa no estudo. Esse protocolo poder? contribuir para a sistematiza??o da assist?ncia, permitindo adequar condutas e promover maior resolutividade no tratamento da pessoa com ?lcera venosa em servi?os de sa?de de alta complexidade