Spelling suggestions: "subject:"[een] CRIMINAL PROCEDURE"" "subject:"[enn] CRIMINAL PROCEDURE""
41 |
Die Neuformulierungen zum Haftrecht im Strafprozessänderungsgesetz 1964 /Kohnke, Rudolf. January 1972 (has links)
Thesis (doctoral)--Universität Heidelberg, 1972. / Bibliography: p. 282-289.
|
42 |
Die Versäumung im Berufungsverfahren : das strafprozessuale Anwesenheitsprinzip im Spannungsfeld von autonomer Subjektstellung und öffentlichen Interessen am Beispiel des 329 Abs. 1,2 StPO /Lüer, Gunnar. January 2003 (has links) (PDF)
Univ., Diss.--Göttingen, 2002.
|
43 |
Florida's evolving sentencing policy an analysis of the impact of sentencing guidelines transformations /Crow, Matthew S. Gertz, Marc G. January 2005 (has links)
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Florida State University, 2005. / Advisor: Dr. Marc Gertz, Florida State University, School of Criminology and Criminal Justice. Title and description from dissertation home page (viewed June 9, 2005). Document formatted into pages; contains x, 179 pages. Includes bibliographical references.
|
44 |
Die Grenzen, die das Strafrecht dem Anwalt in seiner Tätigkeit als VerteidigerziehtKuster, Werner. January 1925 (has links)
Inaug. Diss. -- Freiburg i.B. / Bibliography: p. v-vi.
|
45 |
Die Strafrechtspflege im Kt. Glarus Darstellung und Kritik auf geschichtlicher Grundlage /Streiff, Heinrich, January 1948 (has links)
Thesis (doctoral)--Universität Zürich, 1947. / Vita. Bibliography: p. xix-xxvi.
|
46 |
Legaliteitsbeginsel in die strafprosesregJoubert, J. J. 06 1900 (has links)
Text in Afrikaans / Weens die gebrek aan wetenskaplike bewerking van die legaliteitsbeginsel in die
strafprosesreg, moet leiding gesoek word by leerstukke en beginsels van die staatsreg
wat gemoeid is met die onderdaan-staatsgesagproblematiek (rule of law, die regstaat,
due process of law en menseregte) asook by die legaliteitsbeginsel in die strafreg. 'n
Leerstelling wat gemeenskaplik aan al hierdie leerstukke en beginsels is, is dat
willekeurige owerheidsgesagsuitoefening teenoor die regsonderdaan in bedwang gehou
moet word deur reelgebondenheid. Daar moet veral gelet word of daar blyke is van
ontwikkeling vanaf die formele aspek (die beperkte eis dat daar 'n regsbasis vir
owerheidsoptrede moet wees) na 'n materiele inhoud (of die betrokke leerstuk ingestel
is op waardes wat aanduiding kan gee van 'n besondere geregtigheidsopvatting).
Die legaliteitsbeginsel in sy basiese verskyningsvorm vereis dat owerheidsoptrede moet
voldoen aan voorafbepaalde en vasstaande regsvoorskrifte; met wetmatigheid as
hoofkomponent van hierdie vorm van legaliteit, is die onderskeidende kenmerk daarvan
legalisme. In sy omvattende gedaante sluit die legaliteitsbeginsel die meeste van die
attribute van die engere verskyningsvorm in, maar stel verdere vereistes: dit verg dat
owerheidsoptrede moet voldoen aan voorafbepaalde, vasstaande en regverdige
voorskrifte wat behoorlik verorden is en volgens 'n vaste prosedure uitgeoefen word -
behalwe in daardie gevalle waar owerheidsoptrede, in die afwesigheid van uitvoerige
regsreeling deur toepaslike norme, gestruktureerde en gekontroleerde diskresieuitoefening
noodsaak. Daar word ter oorweging gegee dat die strafprosessuele regte
van die individu die materiele inhoud van die legaliteitsbeginsel in die strafprosesreg
vorm. Die meeste van hierdie regte is vervat in die Grondwet van die Republiek van
Suid-Afrika 200 van 1993.
Weens die eise van geregtigheid in die individuele geval, word diskresie-uitoefening deur
owerheidsagenture soos die polisie en aanklaer asook regterlike beamptes deur die
legaliteitsbeginsel geduld, maar diskresie-aanwending moet gestroop word tot die
noodsaaklike, aan beperkings onderhewig gestel word en ook gekontroleer en
gestruktureer word.
Met die koms van die nuwe grondwetlike bedeling en die instelling van 'n Konstitusionele
Hof kan stellig verwag word dat die strafprosessuele regte verder verfyn sal word en dat
die toekoms nuwe insigte op die gebied van strafprosesregtelike legaliteit sal bring. / Due to the lack of scientific treatment of the principle of legality in criminal procedure,
guidance must be sought from constitutional law doctrines that address the problematic
inter-relation individual vis-a-vis state authority (rule of law, the Rechtsstaat, due process
of law and human rights) and from the principle of legality in criminal law. A tenet
shared by these doctrines, is that the arbitrary exercise of executive power over the
individual should be restrained through adherence to rules. Whether development from
the formal aspect (that a legal basis for executive action is required) to a substantive
content (whether the doctrine concerned is committed to values reflecting a specific
concept of justice) occurs, is examined.
Basic legality requires that state action comply with rules that are certain and previously
formulated; with adherence to rules ("wetmatigheid") as its main component, its
distinguishing feature is legalism. In its comprehensive form, the principle of legality
includes most of the attributes of the basic form, but makes further demands: executive
action must conform to rules that are certain, already formulated and just,
properly ordained and executed in accordance with a fixed procedure - except in those
cases where executive action, in the absence of detailed regulation by legal norms,
necessitates the structured and controlled exercise of discretion. It is submitted that the
procedural rights of the citizen constitute the material content of the principle of legality
in criminal procedure. Most of these rights have been included in the Constitution of the
Republic of South Africa Act 200 of 1993.
Because of the demands of justice in the individual instance, the exercise of discretion
by the agencies of the state, the police and prosecution, as well as judicial officers, is
tolerated by the principle of legality: provided that this exercise of discretion is limited
to what is absolutely necessary, and is restrained, controlled and structured.
With the advent of the new constitutional dispensation and the institution of the
Constitutional Court, it may be expected that procedural rights will be further emended
and that some new perceptions in the field of legality in criminal procedure are imminent. / Criminal and Procedural Law / LL. D.
|
47 |
Esminiai baudžiamojo proceso normų pažeidimai: teorija ir praktika / Essential Violations of the Criminal Procedure: Theory and PracticeBliudsukis, Svajūnas 31 March 2006 (has links)
In dieser Arbeit werden wesentliche Verletzungen des Strafprozesses, ihre Uhrsachen, die Merkmalen, unterscheidende wesentlichen Prozessverletzungen von anderen Verletzungen des Strafprozesses, die Ordnung der Anerkennung als wesentlich, und auch die Folgen, analysiert.
|
48 |
The End Game of California's Juvenile Justice System: The Case for Complete Realignment and the Elimination of the Division of Juvenile JusticeJones, Bennett 01 January 2013 (has links)
The juvenile justice system was originally set up under the philosophy that juveniles are inherently different than adults and therefore should not be subject to same harsh punishment as adult criminals. Rehabilitative treatment methods became the center of the juvenile justice system in order to reduce recidivism rates and help reintegrate youths back into society as smoothly as possible. This philosophy changed early in the 21st century, and many states began treating youth offenders in ways similar to adult offenders, with a particular increase in direct files of juveniles to adult court. After about a decade of harsh punishment, the system once again reverted back to the rehabilitative model. California did so through several legislative reforms; however these reforms have not been as successful as they should have been, and the system is still in a state of disarray.
California is currently balancing a failing state juvenile justice system while trying to simultaneously support realignment efforts to the county level. After evaluating the failures of Division of Juvenile Justice and the capacity of the counties, it is evident that counties are not only physically equipped to take on the increased responsibility but are much better suited to do so financially. To best uphold the original goals of the juvenile justice system and the rehabilitative model, California should move to close the Division of Juvenile Justice and completely realign all responsibility to the counties. Keeping juveniles close to their communities creates stronger ties, more continuity of treatment, and reduces the likelihood a youth will reoffend. By tailoring treatment to the individual on a local level, problems such as mental illness, substance abuse, and anger management, can be directly targeted and solved. Intervening at first arrest with effective treatment programs is crucial to decreasing the chance that a juvenile will become a career adult criminal. These juveniles are the future of society; focusing on the rehabilitation of these youths will not only increase community safety but will also produce healthy, productive citizens to contribute to the economy.
|
49 |
Cultural diversity in international standards for criminal sentencesBraun, Felix, 1973- January 2001 (has links)
No description available.
|
50 |
FÖRUNDERSÖKNING : Förenklad utredning - Förenklad rapporteringHultgren Viklund, Lotten January 2008 (has links)
<p>Uppsatsen redogör för den rättsliga regleringen avseende förundersökning, kortfattade anteckningar samt förenklad brottsutredning. Vidare så belyses förfarandena i de rättsregler och principer fastlagda till skydd för rättsäkerheten på området. Inom ramen för uppsatsen har två undersökningar företagits för två skilda brottskategorier ringa narkotikabrott, eget bruk samt snatteri.</p>
|
Page generated in 0.0379 seconds