No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

Indonesia and China in Southeast Asia and East Asian, Play an important role. Indonesia in Southeast Asian is the territory's largest and largest Chinese population of people, is located between the hub of the Pacific, Indian Ocean, and occupies an important position in the global strategy, abundant natural resources in Indonesia is also a major advantage; In China, occupying an area of East Asia, half the population after the reforms of China, the world's largest country is fighting for market. On the relationship between the two countries in East Asia can be said to have the hares and some partnerships. Indonesia and China both have a common background in the pre-independence history, so in 1950, Indonesia was the first Southeast Asian country to establish diplomatic relations with China, countries. With the impact of the international situation, Indonesia and China, there were two major changes. A result of communism, the Cold War with the "930 Incident" broke out, resulting in changes in the two countries for the first time. Since 1978, China's reform and opening-up policy to promote economic growth, the two sides began a close relationship, this is the second change. The late 1990s, China's rise on the facts and the ambition to achieve regional dominance, causing concern about the East Asian countries, China can not ignore the potential opportunities and the impact it will change Indonesia's China policy a third change is worth exploring. This article, through the above-mentioned two change, globalization and Indonesia to identify factors such as internal stability, which may again affect the future relations between India and the trends and changes.

Abstract Thailand and China have maintained its diplomatic relationship since the monarchial period. Such exchanges between these two countries remain long standing. On October 1, 1949 the Communist Party began to rule Mainland China, which prompted the Thai government to be more doubtful towards the Chinese government, given the differences in ideology, political and economic system. In the same light, China¡¦s relationship with the rest of the world has become complicated during the Cold War period. Thailand and China have formally inked its diplomatic treaties of agreement on July 1, 1975, which paved the way for diplomatic exchanges and friendly visits. The relationship between these two nations is deeply rooted from the strong ties established during the early times. The similarities in their culture, custom and traditions have further enhanced their kinship as neighboring countries in Asia. The rise of United States, Soviet Union and China as emerging super powers and the acceleration of the Communist forces specifically in Thailand and Vietnam has lead the Thai government to expedite the development of a better diplomatic relationship with China since 1975. The end of ¡§Cultural Revolution¡¨ and Deng Xiaoping¡¦s initiative in opening China to the outside world can also be regarded as important factors for the Thai government in inking an agreement with China. Despite of the uncertainties the world was facing during the Cold War period, the pact between Thailand and China has continually flourished on a variety of fields, including exchanges through renewed friendship, strategic alliance and economic cooperation. This thesis shall present an in-depth analysis of the history behind the transitions in the diplomatic relationship between Thailand and China.

No description available.

The United States Constitution divides the authority over U S. foreign affairs between the President and Congress. Both institutions, the executive and legislative, share in the making of foreign policy and each plays important roles that are different but often overlap. The United States Congress (House of Representatives and Senate), regarded as the tribune of the people, has often been a sounding board for popular discontent and malaise over some controversial foreign policies such as the Vietnam War, Iran Contra and South Africa. Since the 1960s the U. S. Congress has often dra strength from its discontent with the executive branch to assert a stronger role in American foreign policy. This dissatisfaction with the executive branch often come as a result of arrogation of certain powers in the American foreign affairs by the President. This study examines one