Spelling suggestions: "subject:"[een] GENEALOGY"" "subject:"[enn] GENEALOGY""
31 |
The distance from language : reflections on the political discourses of modern JapanFuse, Satoshi January 2000 (has links)
No description available.
|
32 |
Contour encoded compression and transmission /Nelson, Christopher, January 2006 (has links) (PDF)
Thesis (M.S.)--Brigham Young University. Dept. of Computer Science, 2006. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 141-145).
|
33 |
Family webs the impact of women's genealogy research on family communication /Smith, Amy M. January 2008 (has links)
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Bowling Green State University, 2008. / Document formatted into pages; contains xi, 153 p. Includes bibliographical references.
|
34 |
Value transmission to adolescents within the family systemBaumert, Marcia, January 1992 (has links) (PDF)
Thesis (M.T.S.)--Catholic Theological Union at Chicago, 1992. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 121-122).
|
35 |
Value transmission to adolescents within the family systemBaumert, Marcia, January 1992 (has links)
Thesis (M.T.S.)--Catholic Theological Union at Chicago, 1992. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 121-122).
|
36 |
Value transmission to adolescents within the family systemBaumert, Marcia, January 1992 (has links)
Thesis (M.T.S.)--Catholic Theological Union at Chicago, 1992. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 121-122).
|
37 |
Charted territory, women writing genealogy in recent Canadian fictionGordon, Neta January 2002 (has links) (PDF)
No description available.
|
38 |
Creative Book Arts Preserving Family HistoryTabor, Sarah Owen January 2002 (has links) (PDF)
No description available.
|
39 |
Matthew 1:1-17 as a summary of Israel's story : the Messiah, his brothers, and the nationsHood, Jason Brian January 2010 (has links)
The present thesis answers two questions. First, why does Matthew append ‘and his brothers’ to Judah and Jechoniah (1:2, 11)? Secondly, why does Matthew include the following four annotations: ‘and Zerah by Tamar’, ‘by Rahab’, ‘by Ruth’, and ‘by the [wife] of Uriah’ (1:3-6)? A composition critical methodological approach leads to the consideration of relevant compositional categories, namely (1) biblical genealogies, particularly ‘annotated genealogy’; and (2) story summaries, particularly summaries of Israel’s story (SIS). Underappreciated or under developed aspects of these categories are highlighted. A list of SIS in ancient literature is assembled that is fuller than previous such compilations and on improved methodological footing. Various tendencies shared by such summaries support the present interpretation of the genealogy. The addition of ‘and his brothers’ to Judah recalls his royal role, elucidated in Genesis 49:8, which leads to ‘David the King’ (1:6) and the ‘Messiah’ (1:1, 16, 17). Arguably linked by ‘and his brothers’ (1:2, 11), Judah and Jechoniah in Second Temple literature are understood to have reversed their wickedness and earned royal status by self-sacrifice, perhaps pointing to the sacrifice of Jesus before his full enthronement. After a review of the current scholarly options on the ‘four (five) women’ in the genealogy, an overlooked interpretation of 1:3-6 is developed. Matthew does not name four women but four Gentiles (Tamar, Rahab, Ruth and Uriah); each is celebrated as praiseworthy in the OT and in Jewish and Christian tradition. The four point to the global implications of Jesus’ mission. The final chapter examines the close relationship between the beginning and the ending of the Gospel. A possible relationship between Genesis 49:8-10 and Matthew 1:1-17, 28:10, 16-20 is described: Jesus’ ‘brothers; worship him and he begins to receive the obedience of the nations.
|
40 |
Children, Pathology and Politics:Genealogical Perspectives on the Construction of the Paedophile in South AfricaBowman, Brett 17 November 2006 (has links)
Faculty of Humanities
School of Human and Community Development
9505866y
bowmab@unisa.ac.za / Through an analysis informed by the genealogical method as derived from Foucault
(1980a), this study examines the discourses and material conditions that have
produced the South African paedophile. Archival texts and contemporary discursive
matter are critically analysed against the backdrop of the material conditions of
political possibility with which they intersected to construct the paedophile of the
South African present. The study traces constructions of the paedophile as a relatively
innocuous nuisance in a selected sequence of past historical periods through to the
recidivism, sexual malice and aggression that define its contemporary
characterisations.
In South Africa, practices such as surveillance and disciplines the likes of
demography and psychology became integral to the effective management and
regulation of a distinctly racialised population. It was precisely through these forms of
apartheid governance and power that the conditions for the emergence of the
paedophile in South Africa were produced. This early paedophilia threatened the
future purity of South African whiteness and therefore the integrity of the apartheid
state. The racialised constructions of sexuality of the time precluded the assimilation
of blackness into the discursive matrix of paedophiliac desire.
The impending collapse of apartheid signalled the reconstitution of black children.
While apartheid constructed black children as posing a fundamental threat to white
hegemony, discourses beginning in the mid 1980s repositioned them as vulnerable
victims of apartheid itself. It was from within these discourses that child sexual abuse
(CSA) as a public health concern began to crystallise. Paedophilia however, remained
a powerful component of this burgeoning discourse. Locating blackness within the
fields of discipline and desire, in turn produced the material conditions for an everexpanding
net of paedophiliac suspicion. This new biopolitical dispensation affixes
the paedophiliac crime to all in its scope, such that the symptomatic desire of the once
peripherally pathological paedophile can now be insinuated into the fantasies and
practices of all of the citizens of a recently “liberated” and democratic South Africa.
|
Page generated in 0.0262 seconds