Denna rapport redogör dels för utvecklingen av två applikationer för Android och dels för jämförelsen mellan de två. Dessa applikationer skulle regelbundet samla in och skicka sin position till en server för spårning. Tanken var att en administratör för till exempel ett orienteringsevent skulle kunna följa deltagarna i realtid. I slutet av rapporten återfinns en utvärdering av de två applikationerna som utvecklades som försöker avgöra vilken av de två applikationerna som verkar effektivast med avseende på energikonsumtion och dataöverföringshastighet.   Arbetet utfördes åt Progmera i Linköping som tidigare haft en del kunder inom bl a orienteringsbranchen. / This report details both the development of two separate applications for Android and a comparative evaluation between the two. The applications where supposed to regularly collect and transmit the device position to a server for tracking. The applications where meant to be used at orientation events to maintain locations of all participants in real-time. At the end of this report the evaluation tries to determine the most effective solution based on energy consumption and data transfer time.   The project was performed for Progmera in Linköping, Sweden. The company had clients in the orientation business.

A comparative study between the techniques Bluetooth Low Energy and Bluetooth Classic has been performed in cooperation with Saab AB with the purpose to determine which technique is best suited for transmission of data between an Android unit and an embedded system. The parameters that has been analyzed are throughput, energy efficiency and susceptibility. The study has been performed in accordance with the method Design Science Research and has therefore produced an artefact in the form of a system that has been evaluated in an experiment where performance parameters have been measured and analyzed. The results show that BLE is more robust in environments with a high level of noise and can handle lower SNR levels than BR/EDR; 3 dB vs 7,5 dB. If enough transfer speed is reached, BLE would also give the best energy efficiency and if the specified maximum throughput is reached, BLE would, according to this study, have more than double the energy efficiency as BR/EDR. BLE is, according to most measures, preferable from Bluetooth version 5 and is future-proof but BR/EDR still provides the highest throughput.