本研究旨在建構公立大學國際化指標。研究方法部分，先以文獻分析歸納出公立大學國際化初擬指標，再以專家適切性評估問卷及模糊德菲法問卷進行調查。模糊德菲法調查樣本為14 位學者專家，透過三角模糊數整合專家對指標重要性之看法並篩選指標，最後以歸一化法求得各指標之權重，完成公立大學國際化指標。根據研究之結果與分析，歸納主要結論 如下： 一、本研究建構之公立大學國際化指標，一級指標有5 項，二級指標 有35 項。 二、本研究建構之公立大學國際化一級指標，依權重排序依序為「研 究與學術成果」(20.70%)、「行政與環境支援」(20.34%)、「學生與教 師國際流動」(20.12%)、「學術交流與聯盟」(20.08%)及「課程與教 學」(18.76%)。 三、本研究建構之公立大學國際化二級指標，在研究與學術成果方面，以 國際合作之研究計畫案件數及金額重要性最高；在行政與環境支援方 面，以國際化業務行政人員具備外語專長之比例重要性最高；在學生 與教師國際流動方面，以攻讀學位之境外學生人數重要性最高；在學 術交流與聯盟方面，以教師擔任國際學術團體職位之數量重要性最高； 在課程與教學方面，以外語授課之課程數量重要性最高。 最後，依據研究結果分別對教育主管機關、公立大學及後續研究提出 建議。 / The purpose of this study is to construct the indicators for internationalization of public universities in Taiwan. The study is conducted by means of literature review, developeing the indicators of internationalization of public universities preliminarily, investigating the suggestion of 12 experts by questionnaire for research methods. It used Fuzzy Delphi Method. Moreover, it choosed 14 experts to show the importance of the indicators by questionnaire and qualitified the experts’ opinions and analyze the symmetric triangular fuzzy number. In the final stage, normalization of fuzzy number’s total score determined the weight of each indicator. Accordingly, the indicators for internationalization of public universities in Taiwan was constructed.The conclusions are listed below: 1. The indicators for internationalization of public universities consists 5 first level indicators and 35 second level indicators. 2. The 5 first level indicators are: research and academic achievement (20.70%), administrative and environmental support (20.34%), student and teacher mobility (20.12%), academic exchanges and alliances (20.08%), curriculum and teaching (18.76%). 3. The second level indicators are: “the number of cases and the amount of international cooperation research project”is the most important indicator in “research and academic”; “the proportion of international business staff with expertise in foreign languages”is the most important indicator in “administrative and environmental support”;“the number of foreign students enrolled in degree”is the most important indicator in “student and teacher mobility”; “teacher as positions of international academic communities”is the most important indicator in “academic exchanges and alliances”; “the number of courses taught in foreign languages”is the most important indicator in “curriculum and teaching”. To sum up, the suggestions for educational administrative institutions, public universities and future study are based on the findings and results.