台俄雙方展開經貿交流已經有十多年的歷史了，但這十幾年來台灣與俄羅斯之間的經貿關係 不論於貿易額上或雙邊各種對於投資者法規的簽定上沒有較突破性的進展，台商在俄羅斯市場 面臨重重的困境，台灣企業到俄羅斯投資時究竟遇到哪些障礙？本論文將運用模糊理論的概念，以「模糊德菲法」與「模糊層級分析法」作為研究分析方法，藉此篩選出台商赴俄羅斯所面臨投資障礙的重要性程度，以了解台商赴俄羅斯所面臨眾多投資障礙中哪些對台商影響最為嚴 重。本論文的問卷發放將分為兩階段：第一階段先發放模糊德菲法專家問卷期望透過產官學三方面決策群體的意見確立架構與各項評估因子，第二階段再進行模糊層級分析法以求算各進入 障礙的權重關係。依據本研究的結果我們可以歸納出： 1. 在經過專家訪談以及文獻回顧所歸納出的五大構面台商赴俄投資障礙，立法、社會、經濟、金融、政治中、立法以及政治方面的問題是對赴俄羅斯投資的台商受影響最大的。 2. 立法問題上投資法令不透明，中央地方法令的規定不一是影響台商最大的。 3. 經濟金融方面高度的通貨膨脹以及高關稅重複課稅銀行體系不健全為台商赴俄投 資所面臨經濟金融方面的障礙。 4. 社會方面當地緊密的關係網絡對於台商在俄羅斯的阻礙相當大，由於俄羅斯社會 上對於關係仍相當重視無法打入當地的生活圈阻礙了台商於俄羅斯當地的投資。

本研究旨在探討新北市地區公立國民小學在少子化趨勢下，學校規模所產生的變化情形及規模類型為何，並探求新北市國小學校最適經營規模，最後整合教育利害關係人的需求與看法，歸納出學校適正化策略，另外也進一步模擬規劃新北市三重分區學校適正化具體做法。 本研究採文獻分析法、模糊德菲法，針對新北市公立國民小學學校規模及學校配置合宜性進行探究；於101年11月共發出130份問卷，共回收問卷105份，有效問卷共92份。 本研究主要研究發現為： ㄧ、新北市公立國民小學最適經營規模為「每年級至少5~8個班」，最適合的班級規模為「每個班級16~25人」，依此原則推估新北市公立國小學校最適規模之學生總數為480~1200人。 二、新北市通學距離應定義為都市地區1公里內、偏遠地區則為2公里內較為適宜；除此之外，小學生的通學時間應以30分鐘為限。 三、新北市公立國民小學總班級數與總學生數呈現逐年下降趨勢。 四、新北市各公立國小學校規模變化有所不同，具有多元規模類型。 五、學校適正化方針之具體作法包括:擬定整體階段性計畫、維持學校適正配置、整體評估校舍建築、設置新學校、重新設定學區範圍、推估學齡人口與就學需求、召開區域性政策公聽會等。 關鍵字:學校適正化、最適經營規模、模糊德菲法 / This study aimed to discuss the change and the typology of public elementary school scales in New Taipei City due to recent declining birthrate for exploring optimal operating scale. Strategies of optimal operating scale might be summed up by integrating needs and perspectives of education stakeholders. Furthermore, concrete ways could be come up to formulate optimal operating scale of public elementary schools in the district of Sanchong in New Taipei City. It was undergoing public elementary school scales in New Taipei City and the appropriateness of school allocation by literature review method plus fuzzy Delphi method. Total 130 copies of questionnaires were sent out in November 2012, 105 copies returned and out of them 92 copies valid. The major finding would be as followed: 1. Among public elementary schools in New Taipei City, it is concluded for the optimal operating scale containing “5 to 8 classes each grade”, the optimal class scale containing “16 to 25 persons each class”, and consequently , the optimal scale of student sum containing 480 to 1200 persons in estimation. 2. Commuting distances in New Taipei City should properly define as 1 kilometer within urban areas and as 2 kilometers in remote regions. Besides, time of pupils walking to school should be within 30 minutes. 3. Class sum and pupil total among public elementary schools in New Taipei City appear downward year by year. 4. It differs and bears multi-scales of typology concerning the change of public elementary school scales in New Taipei City. 5. Some concrete ways fulfill optimal operating scale: Making overall progressive plans, maintaining school allocation of optimal operating scale, assessing overall architectures, setting up new schools, resettling school district, estimating school-age population and schooling needs, holding regional policy public hearing, etc. Key words: Optimal Scale of Schools , Optimal Operating Scale , Fuzzy Delphi Method

本研究旨在建構國民中小學校長評鑑指標系統，了解指標系統之權重，並提出結論與建議，以供主管教育行政機關實施校長評鑑之參考，並提供後續研究之參考。 在研究方法部分，首先，以文獻分析探討校長評鑑之理論分析，了解校長評鑑之意義、相關概念、目的與程序；探討國內校長評鑑之現況；探討國內校長評鑑之相關研究；探討校長評鑑指標系統之建構，並初擬本研究國民中小學校長評鑑指標系統。第二，以專家審查問卷調查10位專家學者對本研究初擬之指標系統之意見。第三，採模糊德菲法問卷，以18位專精於校長評鑑之專家學者以及富實務經驗之校長為研究對象，以進行本研究指標系統之篩選。第四，採層級分析法問卷，以前揭篩選之指標系統為基礎建構問卷，同樣對18位研究對象進行調查，以建構本研究指標系統之權重。 根據研究之結果與分析，歸納本研究結論如下： 一、本研究建構之國民中小學校長評鑑指標系統共三階層，計有六大領域，十二個向度，三十八項指標。 二、本研究建構之國民中小學校長評鑑指標系統之第一階層各領域相對權重，排序如下：「課程與教學領導」領域佔23.3%、「學生與教師成長」領域佔21.7%、「行政領導與管理」領域佔19.9%、「政策與校務推展」領域佔13.9%、「專業成長與素養」領域佔12.1%、「資源與公關管理」領域佔9.1%。 三、本研究建構之國民中小學校長評鑑指標系統之第二階層各向度相對權重，在「課程與教學領導」領域下，以「教學領導」向度較重要，佔65.1%；在「學生與教師成長」領域下，以「學生學習」向度較重要，佔65.3%；在「行政領導與管理」領域下，以「行政領導」向度較重要，佔66%；在「政策與校務推展」領域下，以「校務推展」向度較重要，佔70.1%；在「專業成長與素養」領域下，以「理念操守」向度較重要，佔70.6%；在「資源與公關管理」領域下，以「資源管理」向度較重要，佔54.6%。 四、本研究建構之國民中小學校長評鑑指標系統之第三階層各指標相對權重，在「教學領導」向度下，以「協助教師實施多元與適性的教學與評量」最重要，佔38.5%；在「課程管理」向度下，以「主持課程發展會議，帶領教師規劃與實施學校課程」最重要，佔41.9%；在「學生學習」向度下，以「培養品德良好、身心健康的學生」最重要，佔29.2%；「教師成長」向度下，以「鼓勵教師參與課程教學研究，促進課程教學效能與創新」最重要，佔40.9%；「行政領導」向度下，以「激勵教職員工生動機，塑造學習文化與共同領導」最重要，佔31.3%；「人力管理」向度下，以「展現知人善任能力，使教職員工適才適所」最重要，佔46.6%；「校務推展」向度下，以「依照學校背景、特性與需求，型塑共享的學校願景」最重要，佔39.5%；「政策執行」向度下，以「將重要教育政策與法令融入校務發展計畫，並落實與檢討」最重要，佔44.9%；「理念操守」向度下，以「具有良好品格操守，遵守專業倫理規範」最重要，佔36.7%；「專業成長」向度下，以「具有專業責任感與服務熱忱，以專業領導同仁」最重要，佔47.7%；「資源管理」向度下，以「妥善運用各項資源，營造優質教學環境」最重要，佔36.7%；「公共關係」向度下，以「與家長、社區維持良好關係，促進交流與資源共享」最重要，佔51.9%。 最後，本研究根據研究結果，提出相關建議，俾供教育主管機關、國民中小學校長以及後續研究之參考。 / The purpose of the study is to construct the principal evaluation indicators system for elementary and junior high schools, understand the weights of the indicators system, and provide conclusions and suggestions for education administrative institutions to implement principal evaluation and future study. As for research methods, firstly, by literature review, discussing the theory basis of the principal evaluation to understand the signification, related concepts, purposes, and procedure; discussing the domestic current status of the principal evaluation; discussing the domestic related studies of principal evaluation; discussing the construction of the principal evaluation indicators system, and preliminarily develop the principal evaluation indicators system for elementary and junior high schools. Secondly, investigating the suggestions of 10 experts by questionnaire. Thirdly, selecting the indicators system by fuzzy Delphi method questionnaire for 18 experts and principals. In the final stage, constructing the weights of the indicators system by Analytic Hierarchy Process questionnaire for the same 18 experts and principals. The main conclusions are as follow: 1. The principal evaluation indicators system for elementary and junior high schools consists with 6 areas, 12 dimensions and 38 indicators in total. 2. The weights of 6 areas are: ‘curriculum and instructional leadership’ area (23.3%), ‘student and teacher growth’ area (21.7%), ‘administrative leadership and management’ area (19.9%), ‘policy and school affair promotion’ area (13.9%), ‘professional growth and integrity’ area (12.1%), ‘resource and public relations management’ area (9.1%). 3. The weights of 12 dimensions are as follow: in ‘curriculum and instructional leadership’ area, ‘instructional leadership’ dimensionis more important( 65.1%); in ‘student and teacher growth’ area, ‘student learning’ dimension is more important( 65.3%); in ‘administrative leadership and management’ area, ‘administrative leadership’ dimension is more important( 66%); in ‘policy and school affair promotion’ area, ‘school affair promotion’ dimension is more important( 70.1%); in ‘professional growth and integrity’ area, ‘idea and moral integrity’ dimension is more important( 70.6%); in ‘resource and public relations management’ area, ‘resource management’ dimension is more important( 54.6%). 4. The weights of 38 indicators are as follow: in ‘instructional leadership’ dimension, ‘assisting teachers to implement diverse and adaptive instruction and assessment’ is most important(38.5%) ; in ‘curriculum leadership’ dimension, ‘directing curriculum development conferences, and leading teachers to plan and implement curriculum’ is most important(41.9%); in ‘student learning’ dimension, ‘training moral and healthy student’ is most important(29.2%); in ‘teacher growth’ dimension, ‘encouraging teacher to participate curriculum and instructional research, and promoting curriculum and instructional innovation and efficacy’ is most important(40.9%); in ‘administrative leadership’ dimension, ‘encouraging faculty and student motivation, and shaping learning culture and participating leadership’ is most important(31.3%); in ‘human resource management’ dimension, ‘picking the right man for the right job’ is most important(46.6%); in ‘school affair promotion’ dimension, ‘according to school background, feature and needs, establishing shared school vision’ is most important(39.5%); in ‘policy implementation’ dimension, ‘integrating important education policies into school development plans, implementing and reviewing the school development plans’ is most important(44.9%); in ‘idea and moral integrity’ dimension, ‘possessing moral integrity, and compling with profession ethics’ is most important(36.7%);in ‘professional growth’ dimension, ‘possessing professional responsibility and service enthusiasm, and leading members by profession’ is most important(47.7%); in ‘resource management’ dimension, ‘properly using resources, and shaping high quality instructional environment’ is most important(36.7%); in ‘public relations’ dimension, ‘maintaining good relation with patents and community, promoting exchange ,and sharing resources’ is most important(51.9%). In conclusion, the findings and results in hope of providing suggestions for educational administrative institutions, elementary and junior high school principals, and future study.

本研究旨在建構公立大學國際化指標。研究方法部分，先以文獻分析歸納出公立大學國際化初擬指標，再以專家適切性評估問卷及模糊德菲法問卷進行調查。模糊德菲法調查樣本為14 位學者專家，透過三角模糊數整合專家對指標重要性之看法並篩選指標，最後以歸一化法求得各指標之權重，完成公立大學國際化指標。根據研究之結果與分析，歸納主要結論 如下： 一、本研究建構之公立大學國際化指標，一級指標有5 項，二級指標 有35 項。 二、本研究建構之公立大學國際化一級指標，依權重排序依序為「研 究與學術成果」(20.70%)、「行政與環境支援」(20.34%)、「學生與教 師國際流動」(20.12%)、「學術交流與聯盟」(20.08%)及「課程與教 學」(18.76%)。 三、本研究建構之公立大學國際化二級指標，在研究與學術成果方面，以 國際合作之研究計畫案件數及金額重要性最高；在行政與環境支援方 面，以國際化業務行政人員具備外語專長之比例重要性最高；在學生 與教師國際流動方面，以攻讀學位之境外學生人數重要性最高；在學 術交流與聯盟方面，以教師擔任國際學術團體職位之數量重要性最高； 在課程與教學方面，以外語授課之課程數量重要性最高。 最後，依據研究結果分別對教育主管機關、公立大學及後續研究提出 建議。 / The purpose of this study is to construct the indicators for internationalization of public universities in Taiwan. The study is conducted by means of literature review, developeing the indicators of internationalization of public universities preliminarily, investigating the suggestion of 12 experts by questionnaire for research methods. It used Fuzzy Delphi Method. Moreover, it choosed 14 experts to show the importance of the indicators by questionnaire and qualitified the experts’ opinions and analyze the symmetric triangular fuzzy number. In the final stage, normalization of fuzzy number’s total score determined the weight of each indicator. Accordingly, the indicators for internationalization of public universities in Taiwan was constructed.The conclusions are listed below: 1. The indicators for internationalization of public universities consists 5 first level indicators and 35 second level indicators. 2. The 5 first level indicators are: research and academic achievement (20.70%), administrative and environmental support (20.34%), student and teacher mobility (20.12%), academic exchanges and alliances (20.08%), curriculum and teaching (18.76%). 3. The second level indicators are: “the number of cases and the amount of international cooperation research project”is the most important indicator in “research and academic”; “the proportion of international business staff with expertise in foreign languages”is the most important indicator in “administrative and environmental support”;“the number of foreign students enrolled in degree”is the most important indicator in “student and teacher mobility”; “teacher as positions of international academic communities”is the most important indicator in “academic exchanges and alliances”; “the number of courses taught in foreign languages”is the most important indicator in “curriculum and teaching”. To sum up, the suggestions for educational administrative institutions, public universities and future study are based on the findings and results.

本研究旨在建立高級中等學校校務基金績效評鑑系統， 並以「模糊德菲法」蒐集政策利害關係人意見，共建立5項構面29項指標。 本研究結論如下： 一、本研究共建立五大構面， 以構面權重高低排序分別為： 「財務收支及財產管理績效」（21.28%）、 「基金運用、預算編製及執行績效」（20.52%）、 「學校經營目標及經營計畫」（19.72%）、 「基金管理及學校組織運作」（19.51%）、 「學習品質及滿意度」（18.96%）。 二、依照各構面內指標權重高低，依序如下： （一）「財務收支及財產管理績效」構面內最重要者為「教學研究及訓輔費 用占業務成本與費用比率」。 （二）「基金運用、預算編製及執行績效」構面內最重要者為「建立預算編 製與執行作業程序」。 （三）「學校經營目標及經營計畫」構面內最重要者為「學校校務發展定位 與特色」。 （四）「基金管理及學校組織運作」構面內最重要者為「內部審核執行成效」。 （五）「學習品質及滿意度」構面內最重要者為「建立歷年校務基金報表公 開專區」。 最後，依據研究結論分別給予教育主管機關、學校以及後續研究相關建議。 / The purpose of this study is to establish a system about the performance evaluation indicators for the school funds of high schools in Taiwan. By using the fuzzy delphi method with opinions of stakeholder, the study consists of 5 dimensions and 29 indicators in total. According to priority of 5 dimensions, the conclusions are as follows： 1.“performance of financial receipts, expenditures and property management”(accounts for 21.28%) 2.“performance of funds, budget planning and execute”(accounts for 20.52%) 3.“performance of school management goal and planning ”(accounts for 19.72%) 4.“performance of fund management and school organization operation ”(accounts for 19.51%) 5.“performance of learning quality and satisfaction degree”(accounts for 18.96%) According to priority of intra-dimension indicators ,the conclusions are as follows： 1.In the dimension “performance of financial receipts, expenditures and property management”, the indicator “the ratio for teaching, research ,discipline and counseling cost to operation cost ” accounts for the most part. 2.In the dimension “performance of funds, budget planning and execute”, the indicator “establishing standard of procedure for budget planning and execute” accounts for the most part. 3.In the dimension“performance of school management goal and planning ”, the indicator “status and feature for school development” accounts for the most part. 4.In the dimension “performance of fund management and school organization operation ”, the indicator “performance of internal auditing” accounts for the most part. 5.In the dimension“performance of learning quality and satisfaction degree”, the indicator “establishing school-fund statements website over the years” accounts for the most part. According the conclusions, some suggestions had been proposed: 1. suggestions for ministry of education 2. suggestions for school administrators 3. suggestions for further study

十二年國教及中小學教師評鑑即將上路，教學方向的調整與教師能力的提升在不久的將來將列為重要的教師績效指標之一。教師應如何轉型，及如何提升學生的上課狀況，都可透過教學問卷的回饋來作參考；教學問卷可直接且快速的反應學生想法並成為師生溝通的交流管道，使教師反省自我教學方式及技巧，進而改善；因此，在使用問卷時，若利用傳統的統計分析方式來研究結果，強迫學生採用二元邏輯的方式思考與解釋問卷結果，將可能會導致偏差或錯誤的結論。本論文應用模糊理論的概念，以模糊問卷為工具，利用模糊德菲法探討學生喜歡的數學老師類型，再提出新反模糊化值，並藉由模糊威克生等級和檢定及變異數檢定方法，分析學生滿意度是否會因性別、年紀、成績、背景而有所不同，最後討論學校老師及校外老師間的滿意度是否有差別。由實證例子分析結果顯示，我們提出的檢定方法，能有效分析模糊樣本的問題，進而期望能對教學問卷的分析和決策有所貢獻，並將此方法運用於其它模糊性議題之研究。 / The twelve-year compulsory education and the evaluation of the primary and secondary school teachers are brought into practice. The way teachers organizing their teaching strategies and improving their capability will be the key indicators of teachers’ performance review in the coming future. How will teachers fine-tune their instructional skill to attract students’ focus and then to boost students’ learning motivation and academic performance, is binding to the result of a practical Teaching Assessment System. The satisfaction questionnaires designed to students as teachers’ Teaching Assessment is a good evaluation tool to have student’s feedback on teachers’ performance. The questionnaires can quickly and directly reflect the thoughts of the students and serve as a communication channel between the teachers and the students, which can help teachers examine and ameliorate how and what they teach. The result could be used as reference for teachers to enhance the quality and effectiveness of teaching. In those varies of statistical methods used as analysis, if conventional statistical analysis is adapted to analyze the questionnaires and force the students to think and to explain through binary logic, it may result in deviations or erroneous consequences. Furthermore, it may drive to the exaggerated interpretation and detrimental decision. The study, based on Fuzzy Delphi Methods, aims to apply the concept of fuzzy theory and uses fuzzy questionnaires as a tool to analyze what kinds of mathematics teachers the students like. We propose the counter-fuzzy transformation, by using the Fuzzy Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test and variance test to assay whether the students’ satisfaction differ owing to gender, age, grade, or their family background. Lastly, we will discuss whether the satisfaction is different between the school teachers and the teachers in other schools. The result demonstrates that assaying method, as using fuzzy statistics analysis, is a functional and competent way to analyze fuzzy sampling data through its aims and objectives. We believe it could sustain to support related analysis and decision making on Teaching Assessment, and also could be used to other fuzzy test study.

本研究旨在導入總整課程概念於臺灣中小學師資職前教育，探討國外總整課程之內涵與功能，初步建構臺灣中小學師資職前教育之總整課程，並提出結論與建議，以供未來師資培育大學發展總整課程之參考。 研究方法上，先以文件分析出可行之臺灣中小學職前教育總整課程，接著以專家問卷進行課程的刪修，再利用模糊德菲法探究專家學者對課程具備整合、反思與銜接功能之看法，最後根據專家學者們之共識，完成我國中小學師資職前教育總整課程。根據研究之結果與分析，歸納主要結論如下： 一、中小學師資職前教育總整課程形式包含「實地教學經驗」、「研究計畫」、「專題討論」、「歷程檔案」、「綜合表現與評量」五大類。 二、以實地教學經驗，如「半年教育實習」、「分科／分領域教學實習」、「實踐史懷哲精神教育服務計畫」等，在中小學師資職前教育總整課程之各功能認同度最高。 三、臺灣中小學師資職前教育總整課程依據類型不同，具備總整性存在差異。 最後，本研究根據研究結果，提出相關建議，俾供各師資培育之大學以及後續研究之參考。 / The purpose of this study is to integrate the concept of capstone course to pre-service primary and secondary teacher education in Taiwan. This paper not only explores the connotation and function of the capstone course in pre-service teacher education, but also constructs the capstone course in pre-service teacher education for Taiwan. It also provides conclusions and suggestions for universities that offers teacher training programs to develop their capstone course in the future. The main conclusions follow: 1.The capstone courses of pre-service teacher education include five categories: "field experience", "research project", "seminar", "portfolio", "comprehensive performance and evaluation". 2.The field experience, such as " student teaching", " teaching practicum ", " Schweitzer program " and so on, has the highest capstone function in Taiwan’s pre-service primary and secondary teacher education. 3.The function of capstone course is much different in Taiwan according to varietal types of professional courses and activities of pre-service primary and secondary teacher education. In conclusion, the findings and results in the hope of providing suggestion for the universities that offers teacher training programs and more studies in the future.

本研究旨在建構國民小學教育空間品質評鑑指標。研究方法部分，先以文獻分析歸納出國民小學教育空間品質評鑑之初擬指標，再以專家問卷以及模糊德菲術問卷進行調查。模糊德菲術調查樣本為22位對國民小學的校園規劃、空間環境相當了解的校長、學者及教育行政機關主管為對象，透過三角模糊數整合專家對指標重要性之看法並篩選指標項目，最後以歸一化之方式求得各構面以及各項指標權重，完成國民小學教育空間品質評鑑指標體系。根據研究之結果與分析，歸納主要結論如下： 一、本研究建構之國民小學教育空間品質評鑑指標，含兩層指標，第一層指標有 6項，第二層指標有35項。 二、本研究建構之國民小學教育空間品質評鑑之第一層指標，依權重排序分別為「安全與管護」（18.41％）、「舒適與健康」（17.51％）、「特色與美感」（16.59％）、「節能與永續」（16.40%）、「充足與彈性」（16.28%）及「社交與休憩」（14.80%）。 三、本研究建構之國民小學教育空間品質評鑑之第二層指標依權重排序，在安全與管護方面，應特別重視校舍建築耐震防災、避難空間與動線的規劃，以及校園死角的監控管護；在舒適與健康方面，應特別重視校園環境的乾淨與整潔，且教室應有良好的照度以及通風；在特色與美感方面，應特別重視教育空間應富有寓教於境的教育情境、具有美感，以及能展現學校重要精神；在節能與永續方面，應特別重視教育空間能維持生態多樣性以及節水減碳的規畫與設計；在充足與彈性方面，應特別重視特殊需求的學生使用，並有足夠的各式教學與活動及多目的使用的空間；在社交與休憩方面，應特別重視學生交流互動、師生對話，以及與社區資源共享的空間。 最後，本研究依研究結果分別就對教育主管機關、對學校及對後續研究提出建議。 / The purpose of this study is to construct the evaluation indicators for quality of educational space in elementary schools. As for research methods, by means of literature review, and then 35 indicators within 6 main dimensions had been organized as a raw model of quality of educational space in elementary schools indicators based on which the Fuzzy Delphi questionnaire was developed and the survey was conducted with the sample size of 22 experts. Symmetric triangular fuzzy number then was used to analyze experts’ opinion on the importance of each indicator and to help indicator selection. At last stage, normalization of fuzzy number’s total score determined the weight of each dimensions and indicators; accordingly, the quality of educational space in elementary schools indicator system was constructed. The main conclusions are as follows： 1. The quality of educational space in elementary schools indicator system consists with 6 dimensions and 35 indicators in total. 2. The 6 dimensions are:safety and security（18.41％）, comfort and health（17.51％）, characteristics and aesthetic（16.59％）, energy efficiency and sustainability（16.40%）, adequate and flexible（16.28%）,social and leisure（14.80%）. 3. The second layer indactors for the quality of educational space in elementarty school are : in “safety and security”, should be the building seismic disaster, asylum space and the route planning, and monitoring of management and protection of the campus corner ; in the “comfort and health”, with special attention to the campus environment clean and tidy, and the classroom should have good illumination and ventilation; in the “characteristics and aesthetic” context, special attention should be full of educational space education through environmental education context, the aesthetic , as well as important to show school spirit; in “energy efficiency and sustainability”, and the particular importance of education to maintain the ecological diversity and space saving and carbon reduction planning and design; in “adequate and flexible” in regard, special attention to students with special needs, and there is enough variety of teaching and activities and multi-purpose use of space; in “social and leisure” aspects, special attention should be student interaction, teacher-student dialogue and resource sharing with the community space. According to the conclusions, some suggestions had been proposed : 1..suggestions for education administrators,2.suggestions for schools, and 3.suggestions for further study.