本研究旨在先探討新北市國民中學校長分散式領導與教師學術樂觀的現況；接著，剖析不同背景變項與學校變項的教師知覺校長分散式領導與教師學術樂觀的差異情形；再來探討校長分散式領導與教師學術樂觀之間的關係；最後，以逐步多元廻歸檢視校長分散式領導對教師學術樂觀的預測力效果。為達到上述研究目的，本研究採用問卷調查法，以新北市42 所國民中學之主任、組長及教師為研究對象，共寄發問卷895 份，回收有效問卷743 份，有效回收率為83.0％。本研究採用SPSS 20.0 for Windows統計套裝軟體進行分析，獲得以下結論，根據研究結論，提出建議供有關單位參考： 一、新北市國民中學教師知覺校長分散式領導、教師學術樂觀為中高程度。 二、不同教育程度、服務年資、學校地區之教師在知覺校長分散式領導與教師學術樂觀上，沒有顯著差異。 三、51（含）歲組以上的教師知覺校長分散式領導高於30 ~ 40 歲組的教師；在知覺教師學術樂觀則高於所有其他年齡組的教師。 四、學校規模95（含）班以上的教師在知覺教師學術樂觀上，高於44(含)班以下的教師。 五、教師兼主任知覺校長分散式領導高於教師兼組長及教師二組；在知覺教師學術樂觀上，也高於教師兼組長及教師二組。 六、校長分散式領導與教師學術樂觀之間呈現高度正向相關。 七、校長分散式領導對於教師學術樂觀有預測力。 最後，依據上述研究結論，提出具體建議，以做為教育行政機關、國民中學校行政及未來研究人員的參考運用。 / The Study of the Relationships between Principal Distributed Leadership and Teacher Academic Optimism in Junior High School in New Taipei City Abstract First, this study aimed to explore the current situation of New Taipei City junior high schools’ principal distributed leadership and teacher academic optimism; then, to analyze the demographic variables on the different perception of principal distributed leadership and teacher academic optimism, and then to discuss the relationship between principal distributed leadership and teacher academic optimism. Finally, stepwise multiple regression was used to predict teacher academic optimism. Based on the research conclusions, I also proposed recommendations for the relevant institutions’ reference. To achieve these purposes, this study used questionnaire survey method. I used the directors, team leaders and teachers from 42 junior high schools in New Taipei City as my study subjects. A total of 895 questionnaires were distributed, with 743 valid questionnaires. The return rate was 83.0%. Survey data were analyzed by descriptive statistics, t-test, one way ANOVA, Pearson product-moment correlation coefficient, and stepwise multiple regression. The conclusions of this research are as follows: 1. In junior high schools in New Taipei City, teachers’ perception of principal distributed leadership and teacher academic optimism is high. 2. There’s no significant difference in education levels, service years, and school locations in teachers’ perception of distributed leadership and teacher academic optimism. 3. The teachers’ perception over 51 (inclusive) years old on principal distributed leadership is higher than the teachers from 31 to 40. On teacher academic optimism, it’s also higher than all the other groups. 4. The teachers’ perception over 95 (inclusive) classes on teacher academic optimism is higher than the teachers under 44(inclusive) classes. 5. Teachers hold the post as directors whose perceptions both on principal distributed leadership and teacher academic optimism are higher than team leaders and class teachers. 6. Principal distributed leadership is high positively correlated to teacher academic optimism. 7. The prediction of the relationships between principal distributed leadership and teacher academic optimism is supported. Finally, based on the above research conclusions, I provide recommendations as references and applications for educational administrations, junior high school administrations and future researchers.

本研究旨在探討臺北縣國民小學分散式領導與教師學術樂觀的現況，剖析不同背景變項與學校變項知覺分散式領導與教師學術樂觀的差異情形，探討分散式領導對教師學術樂觀的關係，並根據研究結論，提出建議供有關單位參考。為達上述研究目的，本研究採用問卷調查法，以臺北縣60所國民小學之主任、組長及教師為研究對象，共寄發問卷632份，回收有效問卷553份，有效回收率為87.5％。本研究採用SPSS 17.0 for Windows和LISREL 8.80統計套裝軟體進行分析，獲得以下結論： 一、臺北縣國民小學教師知覺分散式領導、教師學術樂觀為中高程度 。 二、不同性別、教育程度、學校規模、學校地區之教師在知覺分散式領導與教師學術樂觀上，沒有顯著差異。 三、50（含）歲以上教師知覺分散式領導高於40歲以下教師，在知 覺教師學術樂觀也高於30（含）~40歲教師。 四、服務年資20（含）年以上教師在知覺分散式領導與教師學術樂觀上，高於10年以下教師。 五、教師兼主任知覺分散式領導高於班級導師；在知覺教師學術樂觀上，也高於教師兼組長及班級導師。 六、學校歷史30年以下與學校歷史90年以上的教師，在知覺分散式領導上，高於學校歷史30（含）~60年及學校歷史60（含）~90年教師；在知覺教師學術樂觀上，亦高於學校歷史30（含）~60年教師。 七、本研究建構之模式經過結構方程模式檢定獲得支持，分散式領導對教師學術樂觀具有正向顯著的影響。 最後依據上述研究結論，提出具體建議，以作為教育行政機關、國小學校行政參考運用。 關鍵詞：分散式領導、教師學術樂觀 / This study aimed to explore the current situation of Taipei County elementary schools’ distributed leadership and teacher academic optimism, and to analyze different background variables and school variables’ on the different perception of distributed leadership and teacher academic optimism, and to discuss the relationship between distributed leadership and teacher academic optimism. Based on the research conclusions, I also submitted recommendations for the relevant institutions’ reference. To achieve these purposes, this study used questionnaire survey method. I used the directors, team leaders and teachers from 60 elementary schools in Taipei County as our study objects. A total of 632 questionnaires were distributed, with 553 valid questionnaires. The effective rate was 87.5%. In this study, I used SPSS 17.0 for Windows and LISREL 8.80 statistical software for analysis and obtained the following conclusions: 1.Taipei County elementary school teachers’ perception of distributed leadership and teacher academic optimism is high. 2.There is no significant difference in different gender, education level, school size, school location in teachers’ perception of distributed leadership and teacher academic optimism. 3.Over 50 (inclusive) years old teachers’ perception on distributed leadership is higher than teachers under 40 years old. The teacher academic optimism is also higher than 30 (inclusive) to 40 years old teachers. 4.Teacher’s year of service above 20 (inclusive) years, their perception on distributed leadership and teacher academic optimism is higher than the teachers under 10 years. 5.Teachers also hold the post as directors’ perception on distributed leadership is higher than class teachers. Their perception of teachers academic optimism is also higher than teachers also hold the post as team leaders and class teachers. 6.Teachers at the school history of less than 30 years and school history over 90 years, their perception of distributed leadership is higher than teachers at school years between 30 (including) years to 60 years and school history of 60 (inclusive) years to 90 years. Their perception of teacher academic optimism is also higher than teachers at school history of 30 (inclusive) years to 60 years. 7.The model constructed in this study was supported through structural equation modeling test. Distributed leadership has a significant positive impact on teacher academic optimism. Finally, based on the above research conclusions, I submitted specific recommendations as references and applications for educational administration and elementary school administration. Keywords: distributed leadership, teacher academic optimism

本研究旨在瞭解國民中學校長分散式領導與學校教育成效現況，並探討國民中學校長分散式領導對學校教育成效之影響。本研究採用調查研究法，自編「分散式領導量表」與「學校教育成效量表」，以八個縣市的公立國民中學正式教師為研究對象，並另外發送校長版問卷以求得校長基本資料。藉由專家效度審查與預試回收有效教師問卷173份，進行項目分析、一階驗證性分析、二階驗證性分析以及信度分析，以形成正式問卷。正式問卷發送1000份教師問卷和100份校長版問卷，回收有效教師問卷567份，回收率為56.7%。本研究以描述性統計、單因子變異數分析、多變量變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關以及結構方程模式等統計方式，對回收資料進行分析。 本研究獲致之結論如下： 一、國民中學校長分散式領導實施現況，尚稱良好。 二、校長分散式領導目前最需加強的是學校「情境」文化部分。 三、校長分散式領導目前表現最好的前三項指標是「校長謙遜有禮」、「校長鼓勵團隊合作」、「校長有清楚的學校願景」。 四、校長分散式領導目前表現最差的三項指標是「本校教職員工勇於嘗試學校新事物」、「本校會依同仁的實際表現來評鑑教職員工的績效」、「本校針對表現不佳的同仁會給予改善建議」。 五、國民中學學校教育成效現況方面，教師部分尚稱良好，學生部分尚可。 六、國民中學學校教育成效，教師成效表現最好的是「教師信任」，最差的是「教師學習」。 七、國民中學學校教育成效方面，學生成效表現最好的是「學生教育機會均等」，最差是「學生學習」。 八、教師因「教師擔任職務」不同，知覺校長分散式領導有顯著差異。 九、教師因「教師性別、教師擔任職務」不同，知覺學校教育成效有顯著差異。 十、教師因「學校規模、校史、學校地區」不同，知覺校長分散式領導有顯著差異。 十一、教師因「學校規模、校史、學校地區」不同，知覺學校教育成效有顯著差異。 十二、教師因「校長性別、校長曾經主要任教領域」不同，知覺校長分散式領導有顯著差異。 十三、教師因「校長性別、校長年齡、校長最高教育程度、校長曾經主要任教領域」不同，知覺學校教育成效有顯著差異。 十四、分散式領導與學校教育成效（學生、教師），均有高度正相關。 十五、校長分散式領導可以有效的預測學校教育成效。 根據研究結果分別提出對教育行政機關、校長以及未來研究的建議如下： 一、對教育行政機關的建議 (一) 宜多辦理教育理念與教育革新議題的相關研習給教師進修。 (二) 舉辦分散式領導相關研習，鼓勵學校成員參與。 (三) 檢視校史達60年以上的學校之教師責任與教師信任。 (四) 建立更有效的學校成員績效評鑑機制。 (五) 加強鄉鎮地區的教育成效關注。 (六) 在學生教育機會均等的進步上，可以參考「導師」的建議。 二、對校長的建議 (一) 校長宜增加與學校成員的互動機會。 (二) 校長可以多鼓勵學校成員嘗試學校新事務。 (三) 學校宜建立更專業發展的回饋機制。 (四) 鼓勵教師主動研究與學習。 (五) 提升學生學習動機。 (六) 關心學生自我概念與具備優良公民美德的能力。 (七) 支持學校成員團隊合作。 三、未來研究的建議 (一) 研究對象：包括不同層級的校長、家長、學生對分散式領導的知覺均為 可能的研究對象。 (二) 研究工具：針對不同研究對象發展不同的問卷。 (三) 研究變項：家長背景亦為可行之研究變項。 (四) 研究方法：加入質性研究加以後續探討。 (五) 統計方法：探討更複雜的分散式領導與各種教育內涵的線性關係。 / The study was to understand the current status of the distributed leadership for junior high principals and effectiveness of school education and to probe into the influences of the distributed leadership for junior high principals on the effectiveness of school education. In this study, I adopted the investigation method, self-prepare the “Distributed Leadership Scale” and the “Effectiveness of School Education Scale”, and took the public junior high school formal teachers in 8 counties/cities as my research samples. Then, I additionally distributed questionnaires to principals for basic information. Through the expert review of validity and pretesting on 173 effective questionnaires, I conducted the item analysis, first order confirmatory factor analysis, second order confirmatory factor analysis, and the reliability analysis to construct the formal questionnaires. Then, 1000 formal questionnaires were issued to the teachers and another 100 questionnaires were issued to the principals with 567 effective teacher questionnaires returned, i.e., 56.7% return rate. Also in this study, I analyzed the returned data by using the descriptive statistics, one-way analysis of variance (or one-way ANOVA), multivariate analysis of variance (or MANOVA), Pearson's correlation and simple linear regression and the structural equation models. The study concludes as follows： 1. The current implementation status of the distributed leadership for junior high principals was moderately good and what needs to be improved most is the “cultural environment” part. 2. The top 3 indexes of the distributed leadership for junior high principals were that “the principal is civil”, that “the principal encourages teamwork”, and that “the principal has a clear vision for the school” while the bottom 3 indexes were that “the faculty staff at this school are brave to try new things”, that “the faculty at this school evaluate each other’s performance based on reality”, and that “the school recommend improvement to the underperforming staff.” 3. For the current status of effectiveness of junior school education, it was moderately good for teachers and above average for the students; Teachers performed best at “teacher trust” but worst at “teacher learning” while students performed best at “equal educational opportunities for students” but worse at “student learning.” 4. For teachers, there was a significant difference in the consciousness of the distributed leadership for principals due to different “teachers positions”, “school size, history, and districts”, and “principal genders and main teaching fields in the past” while there was a significant difference in consciousness of the effectiveness of school education due to different “teacher genders and positions” and “principal genders, ages, and the highest levels of education.” 5. There was a high positive correlation between the distributed leadership and the effectiveness of school education (both for students and teachers) and through the distributed leadership for principals, I could effectively predict the effectiveness of school education. Recommendations for the educational administration, principal, and future research are as follows: Recommendations for the educational administration I recommend the educational administration conduct more workshops concerning further educational believes and innovations for teachers, hold the distributed leadership, encourage school members to participate in relevant workshops, review teacher responsibility and trust at the 60-year-old or older schools, build a more effective school member performance evaluation mechanism, enhance its focus on the educational effectiveness in the rural areas, and refer to “recommendations for the mentors” based on the equality of educational opportunities for the students. Recommendations for the principals I recommend the principals increase opportunities for school member interactions, encourage school members to try new things more, build a more professionally developed mechanism for the students, encourage the teachers to research and learn actively, promote students’ learning motivation, care about student self-concepts and virtues of citizens, and support teamwork at school. Recommendations for future research I recommend the future research include different levels of principals, parents, elder siblings, and students, and their consciousness in distributed leadership in research objects, develop various questionnaires for various research objects in research instruments, include parents and elder siblings in feasible research variables, supplement with qualitative research for further probe in research methods, and probe into the linear relationship between the distributed leadership of more complexity and all kinds of educational contents in statistical methods.

本研究旨在探討國民小學分散式領導對學生學習態度之影響，研究採用調查研究法，以臺北縣國民小學三至六年級級任教師為調查對象，預試問卷，共寄出210份預試問卷，回收199份問卷，回收率94.8%，扣除無效問卷5份，有效問卷為194份，，有效問卷比率92.4%，並以項目分析，二階驗證性因素分析、信度分析進行研究工具之研發。正式問卷發出748份問卷，回收665份問卷，回收率88.9%，扣除無效問卷42份，有效問卷為623份，有效問卷比率83.3%。並分別以平均數、標準差之描述性統計、t考驗、單因子變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關及結構方程模式等統計方式進行資料分析。 本研究獲致以下結論： 一、 國民小學整體分散式領導的現況介於符合和有些符合之間。各層面以成員的參與層面教師知覺程度最好，成員的動力層面較低。 二、 國民小學整體學生學習態度的現況介於符合和有些符合之間。各層面以社會科教師知覺程度最好，英語科較低。 三、 教師人口變項年齡、服務年資不同，知覺校長整體分散式領導達顯著差異。年齡越大，知覺校長分散式領導程度越高。服務年資的組間未達顯著差異。 四、 學校環境變項學校規模、學校區域、校長年資不同，教師知覺校長整體分散式領導達顯著差異。學校規模越小、學校區域偏遠、校長年資越小，知覺校長分散式領導程度越高。 五、 教師人口變項年齡、服務年資不同，教師知覺整體學生學習態度達顯著差異。年齡越大、服務年資越長，知覺整體學生學習態度越高。 六、 學校環境變項學校規模不同，教師知覺整體學生學習態度達顯著差異，事後比較，組間未達顯著差異。 七、 分散式領導與學生學習態度具有中度正相關。 八、 分散式領導對學生學習態度具有正向影響性。 關鍵詞：分散式領導、學習態度、國民小學 / This study aims to explore the relationship between the distributed leadership and students’ learning attitude in the elementary schools. The Survey Research Method is adopted, and the research objects are the third to sixth grade elementary school teachers in Taipei. A total of 210 pre-test questionnaires were distributed, with 194 invalid questionnaires. The effective rate was 92.4%. In this study, item analysis, second-order confirmatory factor analysis, and the reliability analysis are applied. 748 formal questionnaires are distributed, with 665 valid, representing 83.5% effective. With the use of SPSS 17.0 for Windows and LISREL 8.80 statistical software for analysis, descriptive statistics, t-test, one-way analysis of variance, and Person product-moment correlation, and Structural Equation Models were employed in this study, and obtain the conclusion as follows: 1. The overall current conditions of distributed leadership in the elementary schools are good. Objects perform the best in the teacher’s perception of the member’s participation aspect while the member’s motivation performs the worst. 2. The overall current conditions of students’ learning attitude in the elementary schools are good. Among them, teachers in the Social Studies perceived the distributed leadership the best while the ones in the English the worse 3. There is significant difference for different teacher characteristics such as ages, years of service to perceived the principals’ distributed leadership. The older the age, the level of the principal distributed leadership perception the higher. There is no significant difference among the four different year-of-service groups. 4. With the different environmental variables in the school scale, school area, and principal’s years of service, the teachers significantly perceived the principal distributed leadership differently. The smaller the school, the level of principal distributed leadership perception the higher. The same results are obtained if the remoter the school, and the smaller the principal’s years of service, which means the level of principal distributed leadership perception is higher. 5. There is significant difference in the teacher perception of students’ learning attitude with different teacher characteristics such as ages, years of service. The older the teachers’ age, the level of students’ learning attitude perception the higher. 6. With the different scales of schools, the difference achieves significance in the way of teachers sensing the students’ learning attitude. Through post-hoc comparison, there is no difference among groups. 7. Distributed leadership has a significant positive correlation with students’ learning attitude. 8. Distributed leadership has a significant positive impact on students’ learning attitude. Keywords: distributed leadership, learning attitude, elementary school