• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 1
  • 1
  • Tagged with
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

桃園縣國民中學適性輔導評估指標之研究 / A Study on the Evaluation Indicators for Adaptive Counseling in Taoyuan County Junior High Schools.

林光偉 Unknown Date (has links)
本研究旨在建構國民中學適性輔導評估指標,當前在十二年國民基本教育的推動之中,落實學校的適性輔導工作是重點任務。首先藉由文獻探討適性輔導相關論述為基礎,初擬指標架構,運用專家問卷以及模糊德菲術(fuzzy Delphi method),並以桃園縣政府教育局行政人員、桃園縣國民中學校長、教務主任、輔導主任、輔導與諮商中心專業人員及教師為研究對象,透過問卷蒐集政策利害關係人之意見,共發出10 份專家問卷及16 份正式問卷。根據正式問卷填答結果,計算各層面、項目及指標之三角模糊數(triangular fuzzy number),再將其反模糊化(defuzzification),求得各層面、項目及指標之效用總值,自訂門檻值為0.6,篩選出3層面、17項目及37個指標,並以歸一化之方式確立各層面、項目及指標權重。各層面之權重由高至低依序為課程規劃與教學活動(33.9%)、組織與行政運作(33.6%)以及生涯檔案建置與應用(32.5%)。最後根據此指標架構對教育行政機關、學校及未來研究提出建議。 / The study aims to construct a junior high school adaptive counseling evaluation indicators. The implementation of adaptive counseling in the school becomes the foremost important task when promoted by the current 12-Year Basic Education. The study first applies a literature review to discuss the adaptive counseling related discourses as the foundation, drafting the indicator framework, and using expert questionnaire and fuzzy Delphi method to conduct the questionnaire survey on the administrative personnel of Department of Education, Taoyuan County, junior high school principles, directors of teaching affairs, counseling directors, counseling and experts at the consultation center, thereby to collect the opinions of policy stakeholders through questionnaires. A total of 10 expert questionnaires and 16 official questionnaires were issued. The results of official questionnaire then underwent calculation of triangular fuzzy numbers for the different levels, items and indicators, followed by defuzzification to yield the total valid values of the different levels, items and indicators. The self-developed threshold value is 0.6 with 3 levels, 17 items and 37 indicators selected, which is applied with normalization to validate the different levels, items and indicator weights. The weights of different levels are sorted in descending order, namely course plan and teaching activity (33.9%), organization and administrative operation (33.6%) and the career file establishment and application (32.5%). Finally, the study proposes suggestions for educational administrative agencies, schools and future researchers based on this indicator framework.

Page generated in 0.0217 seconds