本研究旨在瞭解國立高級中等學校校長遴選之現況，透過訪談遴選利益關係人，探討校長遴選制度的優缺點，要如何辦理遴選，才能協助學校選出最適合的校長，從不同的角度檢索遴選制度的配套措施，再依研究結果提出建議。 首先進行文獻探討，作為架構研究的理論基礎，並構築深度訪談題綱，分別訪談教師代表、家長代表、校長代表、教育行政代表、遴選委員代表等，共計訪談14位利益關係人。另外呈現3位不同類型校長的生命故事，供有志朝向校長之路的教育界人士參考。然後建立訪談逐字稿，依據訪談實錄，利用質性分析軟體MAXQDA進行編碼分析，最後依據研究結果進行討論與結論建議。 針對研究發現提出建議：1.辦理嚴謹的校長績效考評，2.建立校長候選人觀察制度，3.修改為筆試成績公佈後再選填志願，4.提早辦理新任校長遴選作業，5.建立儲訓制度，6.恢復候用期間的建議，7.深思二階遴選的意涵，8.均衡遴選委員代表結構，9.召開公聽會以達成遴選共識，10.建立高級中等學校教師分級制，11.建立遴選委員「遴選培訓認證」制，12.強制轉換跑道的校長要接受轉銜教育，13.建立校長申訴制度。 / The purpose of this study is to investigate the selection system of principals for national senior high schools. To begin with, the interviews are made among several beneficiaries. During the dialogues, the advantages and disadvantages of the selection system of principals are discussed. How to select the most suitable principal for schools? From different aspects, the principal selection committee’s organization and operation, the school operation for the selection system of principals are all examined here. First, literature review are adopted to be the foundation of the theory. In-depth outlines were constructed for the fourteen interviews among teacher representatives, students’ parents, principal representatives, administrational delegates, and selection committee representatives. Moreover, three genres of principals are well-depicted for reference. Word for word scripts were transcribed in terms of the qualitative content analysis through the software MAXQDA which generates decoding analysis. In the end, this study provides a discussion based on the research outcome and some suggestions for the policy. Some suggestions are stated as below: a. Conduct a discreet assessment of principals. b. Establish the observation system of principal candidates. c. Modify the procedure that “taking written tests and then elect to fill in the wish.” d. Start the whole system of selection of the new principals as soon as possible. e. Establish the system of pre-service training. f. Restore the pre-service training of new principals. g. Consider the meaning of two stages of selection system. h. Balance the structure of the principal selection committee members. i. Hold a public hearing for consensus. j. Establish the classification of teachers for high school teachers. k. Set up the training system for the members of principal selection committee. l. Set up the compulsory training for those principals who transfer to be another types of school. m. Establish the system of appealing for principals.

我國國立高級中等學校實施校務基金之目的除了提升績效外，尚期以增進各校自籌財源之動力，以減輕政府財政負擔，自2007年起開始實施校務基金後之績效為何?值得進一步探討。 本研究係以資料包絡分析法評估各國立高級中等學校2010年至2012年的經營績效，並運用麥氏指數衡量其跨期效率變動情形，最後以Tobit迴歸分析，探討外在環境變數對校務基金實施績效之影響。實證研究結果如下： 一、總技術效率分析：2010、2011及2012年平均總技術效率值依序為0.712、0.714、0.705，表示各該年度尚有28.8%、28.6%及29.5%的效率改善空間。若將各國立高級中等學校依照類別區分，普通高中平均總技術效率表現最佳，綜合高中的表現比職業學校佳，特教學校最差。 二、純技術效率分析：2010、2011及2012年平均純技術效率值依序為0.768、0.781、0.771，表示各該年度尚有23.2%、21.9%及22.9%的效率改善空間。普通高中平均純效率表現最佳，綜合高中的表現比職業學校佳，特教學校最差。 三、規模效率分析：2010、2011及2012年平均規模效率值依序為0.923、 0.908、0.908，表示各該年度尚有7.7%、9.2%及9.2%的效率改善空間。2010年以職業學校表現最佳，2011年以綜合高中表現最佳，2012年度以普通高中表現最佳。特教學校在三個年度的平均規模效率均為最差。 四、麥氏指數分析：2010至2012年度之總要素生產力變動值均小於1，呈現衰退現象， 2010至2011年度及2011至2012年度二個跨期均呈現衰退。 五、Tobit迴歸分析：除實施校務基金的年限無顯著影響外，學校區位、校舍面積及學校成立年限等三項外在環境對學校的經營績效均具有影響。 / The purpose of national senior high schools in Taiwan implementing National Senior High Schools Operation Fund is not only improving performance, but also enhancing the schools’ self-motivation of the financial resources to reduce the fiscal burden of government. How is the performance of implementing National Senior High Schools Operation Fund since 2007?It is worthy of further study. This study is based on Data Envelopment Analysis to evaluate the operating performance of national senior high schools from 2010 to 2012. In addition, this study uses Malmquist Index to measure the efficiency changes. Finally, Tobit regression analysis is used and tried to find effects of the external environment variables on the implemenetation performance of National Senior High Schools Operation Fund. The findings of this study are as follows: 1.Overall technical efficiency analysis：the average value of the overall technical efficiency is 0.712、0.714、0.705 in sequence of year 2010、2011 and 2012, and it means that the efficiency improvement is 28.8%, 28.6% and 29.5% each year. If we evaluate the performance of national senior high schools by category, the general high schools are the best, the comprehensive high schools are better than vocational high schools, and the special education schools are the worst. 2.Pure technical efficiency analysis.：the average value of the pure technical efficiency is 0.768、0.781、0.771 in sequence of year 2010、2011 and 2012, and it means that the efficiency improvement is 23.2%、21.9% and 22.9% each year. The general senior high schools are the best, the comprehensive senior high schools are better than vocational senior high schools, and the special education schools are the worst. 3.Scale efficiency analysis: the average value of the scale efficiency is 0.923、 0.908、0.908 in sequence of year 2010、2011 and 2012,and it means that the efficiency improvement is 7.7%、9.2% and 9.2% each year. The best performance is the vocational senior high schools in 2010, the comprehensive senior high schools in 2011, and the general senior high schools in 2012, the special education schools are the worst in all three years. 4.Malmquist Index analysis: the value of the total factor productivity change is totally less than 1 from 2010 to 2012, and shows the recession .And the inter-temporal total factor productivity changes show the recession from 2010 to 2011, and 2011 to 2012. 5.Tobit regression analysis: there is no significant impact in the factor of the years of the National Senior High Schools Operation Fund, but the external factors such as the size, the history, and the location of the schools, would affect the performance of national senior high schools.