• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 2
  • 2
  • Tagged with
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

英國高等教育機構審核的效果評估之研究 / A study of the effects and implications of institutional audit in higher education in the United Kingdom

陳立光 Unknown Date (has links)
本研究旨在探討英國於2005年停止對大學實施教學評量、由審核的方式取代之後的具體成效。本研究使用資料包絡分析法對於英格蘭64所大學的運作效率進行分析,投入指標係取自英格蘭高等教育撥款委員會,包括核心教學經費、擴大參與經費,以及研究經費補助三大項。在績效指標的選取上,本研究選取英國高等教育撥款委員會轄下的表現指標管理小組所公布的五項績效指標,包括擴大參與、非延續率、學位完成率、研究產出及畢業生就業率做為大學之績效指標,此外本研究尚由文獻探討找出高使用頻率的教育指標系統,描繪出最真實的英國高等教育成果之現況。瞭解英國各大學在實施機構審核後之績效指標變化。此外並以Kruskal-Wallis檢定、Mann-Whitney檢定,探討英國傳統大學、近代大學、新大學等三大類型之校院的差異與發展趨勢,最後提出結論和建議,做為我國高等教育發展之參考。 本研究之五項重要的實證結果如下: 1. 英國大學總體經營無效率的主要導因於「規模因素」,以規模報酬觀之,則缺乏規模效率遞增的大學、半數以上的院校均已步入規模效率遞減的衰退之路,在規模的擴張上應加以節制。 2. 由敏感度分析發現,「生均核心教學經費」的敏感度最高,為影響辦學績效之關鍵因子。 3. 在「師生比」和「課程完成率」兩個指標上,前者出現了兩極化的現象,後者則在三個類型的大學之間出現了明顯的落差。 4. 前身為技術學院的新大學,在純粹技術效率變動值衰退的比例較高,顯示資源的管理能力較差,資源閒置和誤用的情況較其他大學為高,此可能和新大學普遍立校不久的因素有關。 5. 由平均技術變革可知,大學的生產過程產生了質變,生產技術逐年向上提升,顯示大學可能是引進一個新的制度,使得介於投入和產出之間的過程運作得更有效率。
2

國立高級中等學校校務基金實施績效之探討 / A Study of Implementation Performance for National Senior High Schools Operation Fund

葉淳雯 Unknown Date (has links)
我國國立高級中等學校實施校務基金之目的除了提升績效外,尚期以增進各校自籌財源之動力,以減輕政府財政負擔,自2007年起開始實施校務基金後之績效為何?值得進一步探討。 本研究係以資料包絡分析法評估各國立高級中等學校2010年至2012年的經營績效,並運用麥氏指數衡量其跨期效率變動情形,最後以Tobit迴歸分析,探討外在環境變數對校務基金實施績效之影響。實證研究結果如下: 一、總技術效率分析:2010、2011及2012年平均總技術效率值依序為0.712、0.714、0.705,表示各該年度尚有28.8%、28.6%及29.5%的效率改善空間。若將各國立高級中等學校依照類別區分,普通高中平均總技術效率表現最佳,綜合高中的表現比職業學校佳,特教學校最差。 二、純技術效率分析:2010、2011及2012年平均純技術效率值依序為0.768、0.781、0.771,表示各該年度尚有23.2%、21.9%及22.9%的效率改善空間。普通高中平均純效率表現最佳,綜合高中的表現比職業學校佳,特教學校最差。 三、規模效率分析:2010、2011及2012年平均規模效率值依序為0.923、 0.908、0.908,表示各該年度尚有7.7%、9.2%及9.2%的效率改善空間。2010年以職業學校表現最佳,2011年以綜合高中表現最佳,2012年度以普通高中表現最佳。特教學校在三個年度的平均規模效率均為最差。 四、麥氏指數分析:2010至2012年度之總要素生產力變動值均小於1,呈現衰退現象, 2010至2011年度及2011至2012年度二個跨期均呈現衰退。 五、Tobit迴歸分析:除實施校務基金的年限無顯著影響外,學校區位、校舍面積及學校成立年限等三項外在環境對學校的經營績效均具有影響。 / The purpose of national senior high schools in Taiwan implementing National Senior High Schools Operation Fund is not only improving performance, but also enhancing the schools’ self-motivation of the financial resources to reduce the fiscal burden of government. How is the performance of implementing National Senior High Schools Operation Fund since 2007?It is worthy of further study. This study is based on Data Envelopment Analysis to evaluate the operating performance of national senior high schools from 2010 to 2012. In addition, this study uses Malmquist Index to measure the efficiency changes. Finally, Tobit regression analysis is used and tried to find effects of the external environment variables on the implemenetation performance of National Senior High Schools Operation Fund. The findings of this study are as follows: 1.Overall technical efficiency analysis:the average value of the overall technical efficiency is 0.712、0.714、0.705 in sequence of year 2010、2011 and 2012, and it means that the efficiency improvement is 28.8%, 28.6% and 29.5% each year. If we evaluate the performance of national senior high schools by category, the general high schools are the best, the comprehensive high schools are better than vocational high schools, and the special education schools are the worst. 2.Pure technical efficiency analysis.:the average value of the pure technical efficiency is 0.768、0.781、0.771 in sequence of year 2010、2011 and 2012, and it means that the efficiency improvement is 23.2%、21.9% and 22.9% each year. The general senior high schools are the best, the comprehensive senior high schools are better than vocational senior high schools, and the special education schools are the worst. 3.Scale efficiency analysis: the average value of the scale efficiency is 0.923、 0.908、0.908 in sequence of year 2010、2011 and 2012,and it means that the efficiency improvement is 7.7%、9.2% and 9.2% each year. The best performance is the vocational senior high schools in 2010, the comprehensive senior high schools in 2011, and the general senior high schools in 2012, the special education schools are the worst in all three years. 4.Malmquist Index analysis: the value of the total factor productivity change is totally less than 1 from 2010 to 2012, and shows the recession .And the inter-temporal total factor productivity changes show the recession from 2010 to 2011, and 2011 to 2012. 5.Tobit regression analysis: there is no significant impact in the factor of the years of the National Senior High Schools Operation Fund, but the external factors such as the size, the history, and the location of the schools, would affect the performance of national senior high schools.

Page generated in 0.0113 seconds