近年來，由於經濟不景氣及市場上之不確定因素，使得投資不動產成為保險業資金投入的新興熱門標的。因投資不動產之行為涉及憲法所保障之財產權，如非有特殊事由不得加以限制。保險法第146條亦有規定不動產為保險業得投資之法定項目之一。惟於現行相關法規規範下，保險業投資發展空間受到限制。究監理機關於此所扮演之角色為何？監理目標為何？於現行法制下，相關法規是否妥適合理等問題，皆有待探求。又隨著不動產投資投入之資金日趨增加，保險業者受裁罰之案例亦較過去為多。究過去裁罰當中，主管機關之處分有無不妥適之處，以及保險業者於投資不動產之相關缺失中，是否有可改善之空間，為本文所欲探討之目標。 / In recent years, real estate has become an increasingly popular investment target for insurers’due to uncertainties in the market and the economic downturn. Legally, investing in real estate is a constitutional right to property and protected specifically by the Insurance Act, Article 146. It cannot be infringed upon unless for specific, legitimate reasons. However, current regulations put a fair amount of limitation on investment in real estate. The adequacy of these regulations, as well as the goals and roles of our supervision system, is to be discussed. In addition, there are a growing number of administrative sanctions as insurance companies put more and more funds in real estate. This article also attempts to investigate if these penalties were appropriate and if there’s room for improvement on the insurers’ part.