本研究旨在探討我國數位典藏館員專業能力，以深度訪談法了解數位典藏計畫、數位典藏工作範圍、功能、角色與能力之看訪，並了解數位典藏館員在數位典藏工作上所遭遇的困難與教育需求。本研究之研究目的為：(1)探討數位典藏的意涵、功能與數位典藏計畫；(2)探討數位典藏館員角色、工作範圍與專業能力；建構數位典藏館員專業能力清單，包括：館員工作範圍、能力領域與能力指標。 本研究透過內容分析與深度訪談探討我國圖書館數位典藏館員專業能力，透過內容分析建構十領域36項指標，以作為意見調查之基礎，經過深度訪談與意見調查，獲得以下幾點結論：(1)定義數位典藏係將有保存價值之實體或非實體資料，透過數位化技術予以保存以提供服務與應用。其範圍涵蓋技術、內容、服務及社群四方面，主要目的在於確保所有數位資料的可用性、持久性、及智慧整合，其具有文化典藏、學術研究、教育與學習、以及加值應用等價值；(2)數位典藏的功能以典藏、加值應用、教學最受受訪者認同；(3)受訪機構大部分仍持續進行的數位典藏；(4)數位典藏館員角色以數位典藏推廣者、文化保存者、資訊服務提供者最受受訪者認同；(5)數位典藏工作部分以委外工作人員、聘請計畫助理與工讀生等方式進行進行；(6)數位典藏館員意見調查修正數位典藏館員專業能力清單提出十領域39項能力指標；(7)數位典藏館員對於能力領域劃分較無太大更動，能力指標以metadata基礎編目能力、溝通協調能力、了解數位典藏理論基礎、具備法律相關知識、對典藏品主題背景應具備了解能力、具備文物保存的基礎知識最受認同；(8)數位典藏館員能力指標依據數位典藏館員類型不同而有所差異；(9)數位典藏館員的困難大多來自於經費、人力與授權；(10)數位典藏館員的教育需求對於透過定期教育訓練培養、和透過工作坊、研討會論壇培養、與經驗的傳承，最受認同。 針對所獲得之結論，本研究提出下列幾點建議：(1)本研究建構之數位典藏館員專業能力清單建議應用在圖書館數位典藏工作能力參考與教育訓練；(2)數位典藏館員加強資訊與數位技術領域方面能力的基礎知識；(3)數位典藏館員遭遇經費與人力困難，希望圖書館能有不同管道獲取經費；(4)數位典藏工作相關教育單位應經常定期開設數位典藏相關教育課程。 / The topic of this study is to examine Digital Archives Librarian’s Competencies in Taiwan. The main purposes of the study are as follows: (1) To investigate the meaning, function of Digital Archives and Digital Archives Program; (2) to examine the role, scope of work and competence of Digital Archives Librarian; (3) Construct Digital Archives Librarians’ elements of proficiency competence, including: scope of work, range of capacity and capability indicators. The conclusion of this study is summarized as follows: (1) Digital Archives is the entities preserves valuable information, and is maintained through the technology of digitalization to provide services and applications. Its’ ranging from the aspects of technology, content, services and the community, the main purpose is to ensure the availability, persistence, and intelligent integration of all digital data, which has cultural the value of reservation, academic research, education and learning, and reservation value-added applications. (2) Digital Archives featuring to collection, value-added applications and teaching are accepted by the most of the respondents archiving. (3) The majority of respondents are still archiving Digital Archives. (4) The roles of the Digital Archives Librarian as reservation, culture preserver and information service provider are agreed by most of the respondents promoter. (5)Preserver and part of the work of Digital Archives to commission contracted sustainability staff, hire project assistants and students part-timers and other ways to attain carry on. (6) Digital Archives Librarian’s opinions amended digital Archives librarian’s list of 10 fields of professional competence of the proposed capacity of 39 indicators. (7) Digital Archives Librarian does not respect the areas of capacity divided much changes, capacity indicators for metadata-based cataloging capabilities, communication skills, understanding of digital Archives theoretical foundation, with legal knowledge, for collection of product themes should have the capacity to understand, with a heritage preservation foundation knowledge of the most recognized.(8) Capacity index digital Archives librarians vary according to their type. (9) Most Digital Archives Librarian’s difficulty came from the funds, manpower and authorization. (10) Digital Archives Librarian’s educational needs of the most recognized are education and training for the periodic training, and through workshops, seminars, forums culture, heritage and experience. Four conclusions are made after studying all the data: (1) Listing Digital Archives Librarian’s capabilities advice can be applied to the library’s digital Archives’ work and as work reference with education and training. (2)Digital Archives Librarian strengthen basic information and knowledge in the field of digital technical capabilities. (3) Digital Archives Librarian encounter difficulties in funding and manpower, hoping to have a different library to obtain funding for the pipeline. (4) Digital Archives’ related educational institutions should regularly open Digital Archives related educational programs.