近年來有許多研究發現，適應性管制圖在偵測製程或產品幅度偏移時的速度比傳統的舒華特管制圖來的快，許多文獻也討論到利用適應性管制技術同時監控製程的平均數和變異數。隨著科技的發達，許多產品在製造上更加精密，現今普遍使用的固定參數管制圖並無法有效率的偵測出製程失控，導致巨大的成本損失。為了改善現有管制圖的偵測效率與有效控制製程失控下的損失，我們提出了三種適應性加權損失管制圖，包括變動抽樣間隔(VSI)、變動樣本數與抽樣間隔(VSI)、變動管制參數(VP)來偵測單一製程與兩相依製程的平均數和變異數。採用製程發生變動後到管制圖偵測出異常訊息所需的平均時間(AATS)與所需的總觀測數(ANOS)來衡量管制圖的偵測績效，並利用馬可夫鏈推導計算得之。從數值分析中發現，適應性加權損失管制圖在「偵測小偏移幅度時的偵測效率」與「成本的控制」明顯比傳統管制圖表現的更好，再加上每一個製程僅需採用單一管制圖，對使用者也較為簡便並且容易理解，因此適應性加權損失管制圖在實務上是值得被推薦使用的。 / Recent research has shown that control charts with adaptive features detect process shifts faster than traditional Shewhart charts. In this article, we propose three kinds of adaptive weighted loss (WL) control charts, variable sampling intervals (VSI) WL control charts , variable sample sizes and sampling intervals (VSSI) WL control charts and variable parameters (VP) WL control charts, to monitor the target and variance on a single process step and two dependent process steps simultaneously. These adaptive WL control charts may effectively distinguish which process step is out-of-control. We use the Markov chain approach to calculate the adjusted average time to signal (AATS) and average number of observations to signal (ANOS) in order to measure the performance of the proposed control charts. From the numerical examples and data analyses, we find the adaptive WL control charts have better detection abilities and performance than fixed parameters (FP) WL control charts and FP Z(X-bar)-Z(Sx^2) and Z(e-bar)-Z(Se^2) control charts. We also proposed the optimal adaptive WL control charts using an optimization technique to minimize AATS when users cannot specify the values of the variable parameters. In addition, we discuss the impact of misusing weighted loss of outgoing quality control chart. In conclusion, using a single chart to monitor a process is inherently easier than using two charts. The WL control charts are easy to understand for the users, and have better performance and detection abilities than the other charts, thus, we recommend the use of WL control charts in the real industrial process.

近幾年來，有一些研究提出了只用單一一個管制圖即可同時偵測平均數和變異數。根據此目的，我們提出了加權平均損失管制圖，此管制圖是利用加權平均損失所建立的，在一個製成的目標值和平均數不一定相等時，它可同時監控一個製成的平均數和變異數。此加權平均損失統計量是應用一個加權因子，去調整製程平均和目標值的平方差和變異數的損失比重，所以此管制圖的效能比未經由加權因子調整過的管制圖還好。我們不只建立了固定管制參數(FP)加權平均損失管制圖，也建立了適應性加權平均損失管制圖，包括變動抽樣間隔(VSI)、變動樣本數與抽樣間隔(VSI)、變動管制參數(VP)；我們利用平均連串長度(ARL)來衡量固定管制參數管制圖的偵測績效，利用馬可夫鏈的方法計算偵測出異常訊息所需的平均時間(ATS)來衡量適應性管制圖的績效，並且做比較，我們發現適應性管制圖比固定管制參數管制圖的效能還要好。我們也利用最佳化技術建立最加適應性管制圖，當製成失控時，此最佳化管制圖能使ATS1最小。此外，當平均數和變異數的偏移幅度很小時，我們利用指數加權移動平均法(EWMA)建立EWMA加權平均損失管制圖，使其有較好的偵測力。這些我們所提出的管制圖，是只根據單一一個統計量所建立的，和X bar-S管制圖相比，有較好的效能，且和使用兩個管制圖同時偵測平均數和變異數相比，比較輕易理解且容易執行。 / In recent years, a few researchers had proposed different types of single charts that jointly monitor the process mean and the variation. In this project, we use the weighted average loss (WL) to construct WL control charts for monitoring the process mean and variance simultaneously while the target value may be different from the in-control mean. This statistic WL applied a weighted factor to adjust the weights of the loss due to the square of the deviation of the process mean from the target and the variance change. So the WL charts are more effective than unadjusted loss function charts. We not only construct the fixed parameters (FP) WL chart but also the adaptive WL charts which included variable sampling interval (VSI) WL chart, variable sample size and sampling interval (VSSI) WL chart and variable parameters (VP) WL chart. We calculate the average run length (ARL) for FP WL chart and using Markov chain approach to calculate the average time to signal (ATS) for adaptive WL charts to measure the performance and compare each other. From the comparison, we find the adaptive WL charts are more effective than the FP WL chart. We also proposed the optimal adaptive WL charts using an optimization technique to minimize ATS1 (ARL1) when the process was out-of-control. In addition, in order to detect the small shifts of the process mean and variance effectively, we construct the WL charts using the EWMA scheme. The proposed charts are based on only one statistic and are more effective than the X bar-S chart. And the WL charts are easy to understand and apply than using two charts for detecting the mean and variance shifts simultaneously.