面對經營疆界( Business Boundary)越趨模糊的新世代，高科技電子消費性終端產業不斷展現誘人商機；隨著傳統映像管電視機式微，取而代之的薄型電視機進入市場，關鍵組件及軟體等科技研發競賽不斷推陳出新，刺激需求；原家電品牌(製造服務)業者主宰整個電視機產業，如今卻面臨強烈挑戰；覬覦液晶電視機(LCD TV)快速引爆市場需求，成長力道強勁並快速整合產業加值鏈，各業者競爭激烈，積極進場，甚至Electronic Manufacturing Service(EMS)大廠、資通訊業者等皆企圖搶奪液晶電視機市場。 液晶電視機產業能夠快速席捲市場，主要歸功於相關產業，積極投入研發與佈局，特別在投資新代線LCD面板廠、視訊晶片(IC)及設計代工的快速帶動下，讓產業加值鏈呈現蓬勃發展；而台商在此加值鏈佔有最重要的產業群聚。 從2009年德國柏林IFA、2010年美國CES Show、Computex等展覽中觀察到世界大廠不斷在技術研發向前推進；科技浪頭的百家爭鳴，似乎引領電視機產業來到一個不連續又不斷變動的競爭氛圍。在面臨產品生命週期短促、面板價格波動劇烈、多重廣播標準與門檻及終端市場需求變化巨大的經營挑戰下，產業加值鏈持續透過整合或外包策略因應；本研究個案廠商，考量資源分享極大化以提高競爭力，大多在此階段同時選擇代工(OEM/ODM)與自有品牌經營(OBM)。 本研究藉由文獻蒐集與個案深度訪談，得到來自不同資源基礎的四類個案廠商中，無論是選擇代工或自有品牌為主的商業模式，皆在任一模式佔總營收比重超過80%時，雖然產生部份限制，但從企業追求競爭力的角度來探討「驅動力」，其在降低成本、提高營業利益、養成關鍵技術Know-How、經營顧客服務等將展現最佳營運能量與效率；進一步就商業利益的角度檢視「平衡點」，其對於提高市場佔有率、構築自有品牌、經營顧客關係等亦將呈現效益最佳化。 至於，選擇代工與品牌並重之個案公司，則陷入較為不利之經營局面；然而，若能調整以自有品牌經營為主，與代工做切割，在創新能力、整體(含音質與畫質)設計能力等做到最具精緻特色，此亦極有機會先穩固區域品牌經營，再伺機擴張。最後對個案廠商未來發展做出策略建議，以及後續研究之方向，期為業界在強化競爭力與提高營業利益等經營議題，提供參考。 / The rapid penetration of Slim-Type TV with the price decline which is raised by the great progress of LCD related technology and increasing huge investment on new generation Fab. Taiwanese firms play significant roles in this worldwide prosperity and firmly integration at all-stream for a strong supply chain. As supply chain players keep implementing integration strategy to catch up with the cross-boundary opportunities, various business models have emerged. To address this phenomenon, a novel two-phase analytic framework was conducted to study the driving force and balance condition of Taiwan LCD TV vendors’ contract manufacturing (OEM)/OBM Model Choice. Through case-study and secondary data collection, we found that while facing tough business environment, Most of Taiwan LCD TV firms with different resource-bases , have choose both OEM/ODM and OBM to achieve economic scale for revenue increasing. Also, it’s a way to do cost reduction by sharing the resources. However, this study yielded different results when four-case companies implementing both OEM/ODM and OBM strategy, we found that if no appropriate resource allocation and right people/mechanism, increase another business model to existing model will bring the reverse effect. This paper finally concluded that different resource bases companies should consider various driving force and transform to the most suited business model through continue leveraging their own competences to catch the transient market opportunities.