本文主要探討能源價格對於碳權價格的影響。前半部份以歸納文獻的方式，整理出溫室氣體的管制政策及影響碳權價格的因素。後半部份以歐洲氣候交易所的碳權期貨價格作為研究樣本，首先探討碳權價格與能源價格的關聯性，再者為碳權價格與能源間價格消長之關係。除了以價格走勢圖來比對觀察之外，並以實證分析佐證。結果指出能源價格的改變對於碳權價格有顯著的影響，而能源間價格的消長對於碳權價格則有落後影響的現象。

Schwarz (1997)提出均數回復過程（Mean-Reverting Process, MR）捕捉能源價格的動態過程，而Lucia and Schwarz (2002)將此模型結合確定季節性函數，並推導出期貨價格封閉解。然而，能源價格常會因為未預期事件的發生而產生大幅度的變動，為了描述價格跳躍的現象，Clewlow and Strickland (2000)延伸Schwarz的模型提出均數回復跳躍擴散模型（Mean-reverting jump diffusion process, MRJD），此模型除了保留均數回復模型對能源價格會回復至長期水準的描述外，再加上跳躍項來描述價格的異常變動。而Cartea and Figueroa (2005)則同時考慮季節性和跳躍因子，並推導出期貨價格封閉解。另外，雖然台灣目前並非京都議定書所規範的國家，但環境保護是未來的趨勢，故在衡量能源產業財務風險時，除了考慮相關原料和產品，應考慮碳權交易之影響。為了探討財務風險管理在能源產業之應用，本文以煉油廠為例，將其表示成特定期貨部位的投資組合，並透過計算投資組合風險值來衡量煉油廠的財務風險。文中使用結合季節性的均數回復過程、均數回復跳躍擴散過程進行模型配適。實證結果顯示，均數回復跳躍擴散模型在回溯測試下表現最佳；另外，考慮碳權交易後會使得煉油廠的財務風險上升。 / Schwarz (1997) proposes the mean-reverting process (MR) to model energy spot price dynamics, and Lucia and Schwarz (2002) extend this model by including mean reversion and a deterministic seasonality. This model can capture the mean-reversion of energy price, but fail to account for the huge and non-negligible price movement in the market. Clewlow and Strickland (2000) extend Schwarz’s model to mean-reverting jump diffusion process (MRJD). Cartea and Figueroa (2005) present a model which captures the most importance characteristics of energy spot prices such as mean reversion, jumps and seasonality, and provide a closed-form solution for the forward. Although Taiwan is not the member of Kyoto Protocol, but Environmental Protection is a trend in the future. In order to measure the financial risk induced by energy industries, we should consider the effect of emission trading. In this paper, we discuss the implication of financial risk management in energy industries by analyzing the exposure of refinery which represented certain energy futures portfolios. We use MR and MRJD process with seasonality to model energy spot price dynamics, and calibrate the parameters to historical data. And, we consider the interaction of all of positions and calculate the Value-at-Risk of portfolios. The results show that among various approaches the MRJD presents more efficient results in back-testing, and emission trading poses additional risk factors which will increase the financial risk for refineries.