• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 2
  • 2
  • Tagged with
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 2
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

高級中學學校自我評鑑指標建構之研究

劉鈞銓 Unknown Date (has links)
「學校自我評鑑」係指學校自發性針對學校行政、教學(育)、設備、師資等全方位之評估與檢視,藉以全面瞭解辦學成效,俾利改進缺失、克服困難,發揮學校經營優勢,導引校務發展。 本研究的主要重點可以分成下列三點來說明: (一)透過文獻分析的方式探討高級中學自我評鑑的方法及模式,並透過此模式研訂學校自我評鑑指標及評鑑指標規準。 (二)研究方法係利用概念構圖原理(concept mapping),研擬學校校務自我評鑑指標。 (三)建立校務自我評鑑檢核表、指標權重的統計方式及整體自我評鑑評結果分數的呈現。 透過此方式,學校評鑑參與人員,根據學校組織情境與需求所診斷的結果為本位,在自發、自主的內在動機下,發揮自身的潛能,確其優勢,以解決問題與缺失,促進改善,並在所面臨的外在環境可能擁有的機會下,發揮學校最大效能,以發展其特色的一種學校評鑑的歷程。 關鍵字:學校自我評鑑 概念構圖法 學校評鑑指標 / The school self-evaluation refers to the omni-directional evaluation and inspection coming from the school spontaneity in view of school administration, teaching, equipment and teachers. By means of the appraisal, we may comprehensively realize the school effect in order to improve flaw, overcome difficulties, display the superiority of the school management and guide the school development. The primary intention of the research is redacting the index of school self-evaluation. The research technique uses the Concept Mapping to draw up the self-evaluation index of the school and transfer the index as the questionnaire survey tool about school self- evaluation meter. It could be the important reference for school self-evaluating and school improvement in senior high school. Through the way, the participates in self-evaluation, according to the diagnostic result from the school organization situation and the demand, do themselves justice in potential under spontaneous and independent intrinsic motives, determine its superiority and solve problems and flaws to promote improvement. Besides, bring as much potency as school can into play and develop school characteristic as a kind of school evaluation under the possible opportunity in the external environment. Keywords:School self-evaluation Concept Mapping Indicator of School self-evaluation
2

大學系所自我評鑑之後設評鑑指標建構研究-以JCSEE方案評鑑標準為基礎 / A study on the Construction of Meta-evaluation Indicators of University Departmental Self-evaluation - Based on the JCSEE Program Evaluation Standards

陳怡寧, Chen, Yi Ning Unknown Date (has links)
本研究旨在建構大學系所自我評鑑之後設評鑑指標-以JCSEE方案評鑑標準為基礎,並提出結論與建議,以供大學實施系所自我評鑑之參考。 研究方法上,先以文獻分析初擬出大學系所自我評鑑之後設評鑑指標,接著以專家問卷進行指標的刪修和確定,再利用模糊德菲術問卷整合專家學者對指標重要性之看法,最後以歸一化方式求得各指標的權重,完成我國大學系所自我評鑑之後設評鑑指標。根據研究之結果與分析,歸納主要結論如下: 一、本研究建構之大學系所自我評鑑之後設評鑑指標,計有五大類,三十個標準,六十項指標。 二、參考「JCSEE方案評鑑標準」建構大學系所自我評鑑之後設評鑑指標,其方法可行。 三、本研究建構之大學系所自我評鑑之後設評鑑五大類標準中,以「適切性標準」較為重要。 四、大學系所自我評鑑之後設評鑑各類別標準中,分別以「有意義的過程和結果」、「脈絡的可行性」、「回應與包容導向」、「可靠的資訊」、「評鑑檔案化」較重要。 最後,本研究根據研究結果,提出相關建議,俾供教育主管機關、大學系所以及後續研究之參考。 / The purpose of the study is to construct of meta-evaluation indicators of university departmental self-evaluation - based on the JCSEE program evaluation standards, in order to provide conclusions and suggestions for the university to implement the departmental self-evaluation. According to the research methods, first, through the analysis of literature review, it preliminarily develops the meta-evaluation indicators of university departmental self-evaluation. Second, the expert’s questionnaires modified the preliminary indicators. Third, by using the Fuzzy Delphi questionnaire about important indicators evaluated by experts are integrated. Final, normalization of fuzzy number’s total score determined the weight of each indicator, establishing the meta-evaluation indicators of university departmental self-evaluation. The main conclusions follow: 1. The meta-evaluation indicators of university departmental self-evaluation consist with five major categories, 30 standards, 60 indicators in total. 2. The method is feasible that constructing the meta-evaluation indicators of university departmental self-evaluation based on the JCSEE program evaluation standards. 3. The meta-evaluation indicators of university departmental self-evaluation consist of five major categories, the ‘propriety standards’ is the most important. 4. The meta-evaluation indicators of university departmental self-evaluation consists with 30 standards, ‘meaningful processes and products’ in utility standards, ‘contextual viability’ in feasibility standards, ‘responsive and inclusive orientation’ in propriety standards, ‘valid information’ in accuracy standards, and ‘evaluation documentation’ in evaluation accountability standards are the most important. In conclusion, the findings and results in the hope of providing suggestions for educational administrative institutions, university departments, and future studies.

Page generated in 0.0219 seconds